Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: competition amendment act 2007 section 24 amendment of section 31 Sorted by: recent Page 1 of about 99,820 results (0.735 seconds)

Apr 10 2019 (HC)

Mahindra Electric Mobility Limited and Anr. Vs.cci and Anr.

Court : Delhi

..... concerned to abide by such other orders as the commission may pass and comply with the directions, including payment of costs, if any; (f) [omitted by competition (amendment) act, 2007]. (g) pass such other [order or issue such directions]. as it may deem fit. [provided that while passing orders under this section, if the commission ..... of such agreement or ten percent of its turnover for each year of the continuance of such agreement, whichever is higher.]. (c) [omitted by competition (amendment) act, 2007]. (d) direct that the agreements shall stand modified to the extent and in the manner as may be specified in the order by the commission; ..... and the other adjudicatory; and an appellate body following up the adjudicatory body. the competition amendment act, 2007 was passed on a complete misreading of braham dutt (supra). the adjudicatory function of the cci remained unchanged, but several amendments with respect to its procedure were a mismatch to its adjudicatory functions and were more .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 12 2014 (HC)

K. Nagaraja Rao, S/O.Padmanabha Rao, R/O Vs. the Authorised Officer, L ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... ananthapur district for increasing their holdings seeking benefit of section 4-a of the a.p.land reforms (ceiling on agricultural holdings) amendment act,1977 (hereinafter referred to as 'act 10 of 1977'). in these applications, the declarant and his sons claimed that since the sons are majors on the notified ..... is correct.65. therefore, crp.no.5671 of 2008 is allowed and the order dt.20.11.2008 in lra.no.1 of 2007 is set aside insofar as it directed that the primary tribunal need not grant any compensation to the declarant in respect of the ..... by the tank, it was not open to the appellate tribunal in it's order dt.20.11.2008 in lra.no.1/2007 to hold that the directions in lra.no.2/1990 and lra.no.2/1999 need not be followed and that the payment of ..... land reforms appellate tribunal, ananthapur in l.r.a.no.1 of 2006, the primary tribunal, passed an order on 09- 05-2007 taking the view that compensation for the tank bed had already been fixed in its previous order dt.05-10-1998 along with the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 15 2024 (SC)

Omkar Vs. The Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... by the national medical commission before the publication of the admission brochure for the academic year 2025-26.36. in fact, a perusal of the amendment notification dated 13.05.2019 and the guidelines at appendix h-1 would indicate that with regard to some categories of disabilities particularly, locomotor disability, ..... will issue, an inclusive attitude will be taken towards persons with disabilities from all categories furthering the concept of reasonable accommodation recognized in the rpwd act. the approach of the government, instrumentalities of states, regulatory bodies and for that matter even private sector should be, as to how best can ..... be followed by the states parties for empowerment of persons with disabilities. the convention laid down the following principles for empowerment of persons with disabilities, which the act seeks to implement:- (i) respect for inherent dignity, individual autonomy including the freedom to make one s own choices, and independence of persons; (ii) .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 19 2024 (HC)

Miss. Tanmai Aravind Nirna, Vs. Rajiv Gandhi University Of Health Scie ...

Court : Karnataka

..... of the answer scripts and conducting a third evaluation where there is a deviation of 15% marks and thereafter announce results afresh by considering highest marks for the competition of the results; insofar as w.p.nos.1916/2024, 10509/2024, 9412/2024, 9975/2024 the petitioners have sought for the following relief: (i) ..... have an intimate nexus with the objects and purposes of the enactment and are, therefore within the ambit of the power to make ordinance amend or repeal contended by section 35 of the act, unless it can be said that ordinance is manifestly unjust, capricious, inequitable or partial. the said ordinance was promulgated by the prudent ..... of regulations and guidelines, the regulations would have to be given precedence.5. it is specifically averred that in terms of the "regulations on graduate medical education (amendment) 2019, (for short 2019 regulations ), specifically regulation 11.2.9 provides for award of grace marks upto a maximum of five marks to be awarded at the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 19 2024 (HC)

Ms. Bhoomika R Gowda Vs. Rajiv Gandhi University Of Helath Sciences

Court : Karnataka

..... of the answer scripts and conducting a third evaluation where there is a deviation of 15% marks and thereafter announce results afresh by considering highest marks for the competition of the results; insofar as w.p.nos.1916/2024, 10509/2024, 9412/2024, 9975/2024 the petitioners have sought for the following relief: (i) ..... have an intimate nexus with the objects and purposes of the enactment and are, therefore within the ambit of the power to make ordinance amend or repeal contended by section 35 of the act, unless it can be said that ordinance is manifestly unjust, capricious, inequitable or partial. the said ordinance was promulgated by the prudent ..... of regulations and guidelines, the regulations would have to be given precedence.5. it is specifically averred that in terms of the "regulations on graduate medical education (amendment) 2019, (for short 2019 regulations ), specifically regulation 11.2.9 provides for award of grace marks upto a maximum of five marks to be awarded at the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 19 2024 (HC)

Ms Nayana Gowda M Vs. Rajiv Gandhi University Of Health Sciences

Court : Karnataka

..... of the answer scripts and conducting a third evaluation where there is a deviation of 15% marks and thereafter announce results afresh by considering highest marks for the competition of the results; insofar as w.p.nos.1916/2024, 10509/2024, 9412/2024, 9975/2024 the petitioners have sought for the following relief: (i) ..... have an intimate nexus with the objects and purposes of the enactment and are, therefore within the ambit of the power to make ordinance amend or repeal contended by section 35 of the act, unless it can be said that ordinance is manifestly unjust, capricious, inequitable or partial. the said ordinance was promulgated by the prudent ..... of regulations and guidelines, the regulations would have to be given precedence.5. it is specifically averred that in terms of the "regulations on graduate medical education (amendment) 2019, (for short 2019 regulations ), specifically regulation 11.2.9 provides for award of grace marks upto a maximum of five marks to be awarded at the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 19 2024 (HC)

Shaik Mohammed Afnan Vs. Rajiv Gandhi University Of Health Sciences

Court : Karnataka

..... of the answer scripts and conducting a third evaluation where there is a deviation of 15% marks and thereafter announce results afresh by considering highest marks for the competition of the results; insofar as w.p.nos.1916/2024, 10509/2024, 9412/2024, 9975/2024 the petitioners have sought for the following relief: (i) ..... have an intimate nexus with the objects and purposes of the enactment and are, therefore within the ambit of the power to make ordinance amend or repeal contended by section 35 of the act, unless it can be said that ordinance is manifestly unjust, capricious, inequitable or partial. the said ordinance was promulgated by the prudent ..... of regulations and guidelines, the regulations would have to be given precedence.5. it is specifically averred that in terms of the "regulations on graduate medical education (amendment) 2019, (for short 2019 regulations ), specifically regulation 11.2.9 provides for award of grace marks upto a maximum of five marks to be awarded at the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 19 2024 (HC)

Deeksha V Jannu Vs. Rajiv Gandhi University

Court : Karnataka

..... of the answer scripts and conducting a third evaluation where there is a deviation of 15% marks and thereafter announce results afresh by considering highest marks for the competition of the results; insofar as w.p.nos.1916/2024, 10509/2024, 9412/2024, 9975/2024 the petitioners have sought for the following relief: (i) ..... have an intimate nexus with the objects and purposes of the enactment and are, therefore within the ambit of the power to make ordinance amend or repeal contended by section 35 of the act, unless it can be said that ordinance is manifestly unjust, capricious, inequitable or partial. the said ordinance was promulgated by the prudent ..... of regulations and guidelines, the regulations would have to be given precedence.5. it is specifically averred that in terms of the "regulations on graduate medical education (amendment) 2019, (for short 2019 regulations ), specifically regulation 11.2.9 provides for award of grace marks upto a maximum of five marks to be awarded at the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 19 2024 (HC)

Dinesh Reddy Vs. Rajiv Gandhi University Of Health Sciences

Court : Karnataka

..... of the answer scripts and conducting a third evaluation where there is a deviation of 15% marks and thereafter announce results afresh by considering highest marks for the competition of the results; insofar as w.p.nos.1916/2024, 10509/2024, 9412/2024, 9975/2024 the petitioners have sought for the following relief: (i) ..... have an intimate nexus with the objects and purposes of the enactment and are, therefore within the ambit of the power to make ordinance amend or repeal contended by section 35 of the act, unless it can be said that ordinance is manifestly unjust, capricious, inequitable or partial. the said ordinance was promulgated by the prudent ..... of regulations and guidelines, the regulations would have to be given precedence.5. it is specifically averred that in terms of the "regulations on graduate medical education (amendment) 2019, (for short 2019 regulations ), specifically regulation 11.2.9 provides for award of grace marks upto a maximum of five marks to be awarded at the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 19 2024 (HC)

Ms Pidathala Lakshmi Pranavi Vs. Rajiv Gandhi University Of Health Sci ...

Court : Karnataka

..... of the answer scripts and conducting a third evaluation where there is a deviation of 15% marks and thereafter announce results afresh by considering highest marks for the competition of the results; insofar as w.p.nos.1916/2024, 10509/2024, 9412/2024, 9975/2024 the petitioners have sought for the following relief: (i) ..... have an intimate nexus with the objects and purposes of the enactment and are, therefore within the ambit of the power to make ordinance amend or repeal contended by section 35 of the act, unless it can be said that ordinance is manifestly unjust, capricious, inequitable or partial. the said ordinance was promulgated by the prudent ..... of regulations and guidelines, the regulations would have to be given precedence.5. it is specifically averred that in terms of the "regulations on graduate medical education (amendment) 2019, (for short 2019 regulations ), specifically regulation 11.2.9 provides for award of grace marks upto a maximum of five marks to be awarded at the .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //