Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: competition amendment act 2007 section 24 amendment of section 31 Court: andhra pradesh Page 1 of about 3,386 results (0.219 seconds)

K. Nagaraja Rao, S/O.Padmanabha Rao, R/O Vs. the Authorised Officer, L ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... ananthapur district for increasing their holdings seeking benefit of section 4-a of the a.p.land reforms (ceiling on agricultural holdings) amendment act,1977 (hereinafter referred to as 'act 10 of 1977'). in these applications, the declarant and his sons claimed that since the sons are majors on the notified ..... is correct.65. therefore, crp.no.5671 of 2008 is allowed and the order dt.20.11.2008 in lra.no.1 of 2007 is set aside insofar as it directed that the primary tribunal need not grant any compensation to the declarant in respect of the ..... by the tank, it was not open to the appellate tribunal in it's order dt.20.11.2008 in lra.no.1/2007 to hold that the directions in lra.no.2/1990 and lra.no.2/1999 need not be followed and that the payment of ..... land reforms appellate tribunal, ananthapur in l.r.a.no.1 of 2006, the primary tribunal, passed an order on 09- 05-2007 taking the view that compensation for the tank bed had already been fixed in its previous order dt.05-10-1998 along with the .....

A. Aruna and ors. Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2002(6)ALD548; 2003(2)ALT770

..... while assailing the constitutional validity of the impugned provisions. in the result, we hold that the andhra pradesh motor vehicles taxation (amendment) act, 1995 (amendment act 23 of 1995) and andhra pradesh motor vehicle taxation (amendment) act, 1992 (amendment act 11 of 1992) are constitutionally valid. consequently, we dismiss all the writ petitions with no order as to costs.55. ..... (a) of sub-section (1) or sub-section (4).' the third schedule (see second proviso to sub-section (2) of section 3 of the act) as amended by amendment act 23 of 1995 reads as follows :third schedule[see second proviso to sub-section (2) of section 3]sl. no.period/class of vehiclemotor cycles including- ..... writ petitions, mandamus was sought to declare section 4(1-a)(a) read with schedule 3 part i of the tamil nadu motor vehicles taxation act, 1974 as amended by amendment act no. 27 of 1998, as unconstitutional, violative of articles 14 and 19(1)(g) of the constitution of india and inconsistent with scheme of .....

State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by the Aut Vs. Nalamati Dorayya and Othe ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... to be determined afresh. this judgment has no application to the present case since the respondents are not entitled to invoke sub section (1) of section 7 of the amendment act 10 of 1977 at all.23. learned counsel for the respondents also relied upon the decisions in utukuri sarat kumar and others vs. authorized officer, land reforms, ongole6, ..... therefore, the respondents are not entitled to seek reopening of the issue of computation of the holding of the declarant under sub section (1) of section 7 of the amendment act 10 of 1977.22. in nagubandi pullamma and others vs. the state of a.p. through authorised officer, l.r.t.no.1 khammam5, cited by the respondents ..... land reforms, kakinada..... petitioner. nalamati dorayya and others......respondents. counsel for the petitioner: government pleader for ceiling counsel for the respondents:sri g.krishna murthy head note: ?.cases referred 1 2007 (5) alt4472 2013 (4) ald725(d.b.) 3 air2000s.c. 3191 4 1978 (1) a.l.t. 43 (nrc) 5 1980 (1) a.p.l.j.324 .....

The Secretary, Regional Transport Authority, Guntur and Another Etc. V ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1991AP11

..... applicants without any upper limit. the supreme court held that these notifications were inconsistent with the limitations as to number of permits introduced afresh by the u.p. amending act, 1976 and were bad. their lordships referred to the earlier judgment in hans rajkehar v. state of u.p. : [1975]2scr916 and said that the ..... (para 49):'.......the result of the exercise of discretionary powers, in his (existing licence) favour, will, on balance, be against public policy. it will eliminate healthy competition in this business which is so essential to raise commercial morality; it will tend to perpetuate the appellant's monopoly of cinema * business in the town, and above ..... the contention was rejected by the supreme court holding that if other persons were also allowed the right to carry on the same occupation and an element of competition was introduced in the business, that did not amount to violation of fundamental right guaranteed under article 19(1)(g). in another case in nagar rice .....

A.P. Transco Vs. Sri Gowri Sankar Cable Industries and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2002(3)ALT134

..... import. section 11-b of the act was inserted by amendment act 4 of 1984. it is important to notice the statement of objects and reasons for amendment act 4 of 1984 which is in the following terms:one of the important policy measures adopted by the government to improve the competitive strength of industrial undertakings in the small ..... -section (4) of section 11-b, an industrial undertaking which fell within the definition of an ancillary or small scale industrial undertaking before the commencement of amendment act, 1984 continues to be regarded as an ancillary or small scale industrial undertaking until its definition is altered or superseded by any notified order made under sub- ..... in section 2(b) thereof. section 4 provides for the date from which and the rate at which interest would become payable.39. the 1993 act had undergone amendment by act 23 of 1998. section 5 provides for payment of compound interest. section 6 as originally stood is as follows:recovery of amount due:-- the .....

Sri Jayalakshmi Cloth Stores Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : [1985]155ITR425(AP)

..... it cannot be denied that on march 18, 1972, when the jurisdiction was assumed and proceedings for levy of penalty were initiated by the ito, the amendment by the taxation laws (amendment) act, 1970, has already come into force and the ito is the proper authority to levy the penalty in all cases where the income concealed did not exceed ..... tribunal rejected the contention of the assessee. the tribunal held that the present case is covered by the amendment which came into force on april 1, 1971, by the taxation laws (amendment) act, 1970. according to the amendment that came into force, power is conferred on the ito himself to levy penalty where the income concealed does not exceed rs. ..... holding that the income-tax officer had jurisdiction to levy the penalties for the assessment years 1969-70 and 1970-71, in view of the amendment to section 274(2) of the income-tax act, 1961 ?'2. for the income-tax assessment years 1969-70 and 1970-71, the ito made certain enquiries and came to the conclusion .....

Kanaka Durga Electrical Works, Pedapudi and Others Vs. A.P. Electricit ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2001(2)ALD703

..... go through the regulations, 1987. in exercise of the powers conferred under section 37a of the indian electricity act, 1810 as amended by the indian electricity (andhra pradesh amendment) act, 1984 (act 26 of 1984) (for brevity the act), the government of andhra pradesh made the regulations for issuing of licence to the electrical contractors and issuing ..... electrical contractor's completion-cum-test report in form wr2 is produced; but where the secretary is satisfied that a contractor has unreasonably withheld issue of competition-cum-test report, he may authorise the supplier to give supply on such conditions as he may prescribe. regulation 50 contemplates that the secretary shall ..... as stated supra. therefore, when once the government under delegated legislation, have framed the regulations under section 37-a of the indian electricity (a.p. amendment) act, 1984 and in its wisdom has given power to the secretary or his representative to sign and receive the wrs.1 and 2, as submitted by .....

Coromandel Mining and Exports Pvt. Ltd. and Others Vs. Union of India ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... of natural resources being transparent and fair method so that all eligible persons get a fair opportunity of competition. 18. before considering whether the provisions of sections 8, 10, 11 and 13 of the amendment act, which are under challenge being unreasonable, arbitrary and unconstitutional, we would like to look into the law ..... was not considering the case of auction in general, but specifically evaluating the validity of those methods adopted in the distribution of spectrum from september 2007 to march 2008. it is also pertinent to note that reference to auction is made in the subsequent para 96 with the rider perhaps ?. ..... the supreme court considered several questions amongst which we are concerned with only two, first, whether the exercise undertaken by department of telecommunications (dot) from september, 2007 to march, 2008 for grant of unified access services (uas) licences to the private respondents in terms of the recommendations made by telecom regulatory authority of india .....

Bathina Rajya Shilpa and Etc. Etc. Vs. Ntr University of Health Scienc ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : AIR2002AP115; 2002(1)ALT365

..... apex court as well as this court was incorporated in the regulations issued by the 2nd respondent-university at the time of inviting applications.9. by constitution (thirty second amendment) act. 1973, article 371-d, a special provision with respect to the state of andhra pradesh has been inserted in the constitution of india. sub-clauses (1), ..... entrance test, shall be reserved for the local candidates and 15% of the seats shall be left over for open competition as specified in the a.p. educational institutions (regulations and admission ) order , 1974 as amended in g.o.p. no. 646. education (w) department dated 10-7-1979.(b) in respect of state- ..... (telangana) and sri venkateswara university area (rayalaseema) in the ratio 42 : 36 : 22 respectively and the balance of 15% seats shall be left for open competition.(c) the seats in all the private professional colleges shall be pooled up course wise and distributed among the three regions of the state namely, andhra university area (andhra .....

Mahindra and Mahindra Limited and anr. Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : [1986]63STC274(AP)

..... commercial activities carries on by the state by itself or by a corporation owned and controlled by it was given a separate status as per the constitutional first amendment act, 1951, amending clause (6) of article 19 of the constitution. hence the classification in favour of a state or in favour of a corporation owned and controlled by ..... general and it is not directed against the importer as such. 46. it is true that the record discloses that the second respondent could not stand the competition in the general market and so he should be given protection for a limited period. it is agreed by the learned counsel for the petitioners very rightly that ..... the interests of co-operative societies, cottage industries and small manufacturers has often to the made to give an impetus to them and save them from annihilation in competition with large industry. it has never been successfully assailed on the ground of discrimination.' 21. similarly, we have already noticed that the graded rate of tax in .....