Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: competition amendment act 2007 section 24 amendment of section 31 Court: appellate tribunal for electricity aptel Page 24 of about 238 results (0.585 seconds)

Tata Steel Ltd. Vs. Jharkhand State Electricity

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Reported in : (2006)LCAPTEL1108

..... time after having given three months' prior notice in writing of its intention to the consumer and the consumer hereby agrees to accept and pay such amended charges immediately after the expiry of the period of notice herein-before mentioned.notwithstanding whatsoever has been stated in clause-20 along with sub-clauses, (i ..... arbitration. in our considered view the entire dispute between the parties namely generator and licensees-cum-consumer arose long prior to the commencement of the electricity act, 2003. the parties have agreed to various stipulations including stipulations to pay delayed payment surcharge by the bilateral agreement entered between them. such disputes which ..... clause 24 of the agreement and not by way of petition before the regulatory commission. the interpretation placed on section 86(1)(f) of the electricity act, 2003 by the learned counsel for the appellant, in our view, cannot be sustained.the contract between the appellant and the contesting respondents governs the .....

Rithwik Energy Systems Limited Vs. Transmission Corporation of

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Reported in : (2008)LCAPTEL237

..... the petitioner has no obligation to purchase excess delivered energy from the respondent at any point of time in terms of the provisions of ppa. e. to amend the agreement by including the condition mentioned above.18. thus, it is clear from the reliefs sought by the first respondent that its representation/promise to the ..... principle retrospectively from december, 2003, moved a petition, being o.p. no.12 of 2006, purportedly under section 62 and 86 (1)(f) of the electricity act, 2003 read with regulations 8 and 9 of aperc conduct of business regulations, 1999 before the aperc. in the petitions the aptransco sought the following reliefs: b. ..... granted the requisite sanction on march 1, 2000. the appellant also sought permission of the aperc under section 21(4) of the andhra pradesh electricity reform act for selling energy to the first respondent, aptransco, the then bulk supplier licensee.the commission in its regulatory jurisdiction approved the format of power purchase agreement between .....

Tamil Nadu Electricity Board Chennai Vs. M/S. Ppn Power Generation Co. ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

..... the next sentence in the same paragraph of the impugned order, stated that if the respondent, tneb disputes any part of the claim, he may file the amended claim with the commission within one month from the date of submission of the claim by the petitioner. 39. the reimbursement of liability for specified taxes is ..... appellant, tneb filed an interlocutory application in miscellaneous petition 45 of 2008 (m.p. 45 of 2008) before the commission for extension of time for filing of amended claim as against the claim made by the respondent company, ppn in drp no. 7 of 2008. the respondent company filed interlocutory application in miscellaneous petition no. 46 ..... on the basis of audited profit and loss account as required under the companies act, 1956. this is so because the treatment given to various items (e.g. depreciation) is different under the companies act and the income tax laws. further, after the amended definition of the specified taxes as per the addendum to the ppa, the liability .....

Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd Vs. Central Electricity Regulatory ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

..... cost of the assets is contrary to law. the appellant has also relied on honble supreme courts judgment in derc v. bses yamuna power limited and others (2007) 3 scc 33. appellant has also enclosed relevant extracts from commentaries defining the term depreciation viz., a. financial accounting concepts and applications j.r. monga ..... ) 400 kv s/c ac transmission line between ramagundam and hydrabad and extension of substations at ramagundam, hydrabad. 7. prior to enactment of electricity regulation commission act, 1998, ministry of power, government of india had been notifying the norms, factors etc. for fixation of tariff in consultation with the central electricity authority. ..... that one has not to follow the provisions of income tax act. {emphasis added} 38. appellant has also relied heavily on the judgment of honble supreme court in the case of delhi electricity regulatory commission v bses yamuna power ltd and others, (2007) 3 scc 377. in this case delhi state commission has .....

Reliance Energy Limited Vs. Maharashtra Electricity

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Reported in : (2006)LCAPTEL543

..... vigilance debit--in case where a consumer is found to have indulged in dishonest abstraction of energy within the meaning of part xiv of the electricity act, 2003. rel raise amendment bills under the following circumstances: o reading correction--where bills were sent based on over-reading/under-readings, bills in the subsequent months are ..... period 10^th june, 2003, the date of coming into force of the electricity act, 2003 and up to 20^th january, 2005 the date of enforcement of supply code, 2005. the distribution licensees have been directed to withdraw all such supplementary/amendment bills on the premises (i) that meter testing has not been duly carried ..... came to be repealed in terms of section 185 of the electricity act, 2003.10. the merc, by its letter dated 3^rd august 2004, addressed all distribution licensees, which reads thus: 1. several instances have come to the commission's notice of so-called "amendment"/"supplementary" or other such bills being raised by some licensees to .....

Indian Aluminium Co. Limited Vs. West Bengal Electricity

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Reported in : (2006)LCAPTEL791

..... such open access in inter-state transmission.37. regulation 21, of the central electricity regulatory commission (open access on inter-state transmission) regulations, 2004 as amended by notification, dated the 21^st february, 2005), provides that with respect to the drawal of reactive energy shall be governed by regulations applicable in the ..... licensee, such consumer may require the distribution licensee for wheeling of electricity in accordance with regulations framed by regulatory commission and area discom is to act as a common carrier.26. all that section 42(3) provides that a distribution licensee shall be a common carrier providing non-discriminatory open access ..... licensee shall supply power so long as the consumer remits the charges prescribed as per tariff notification and as provided in section 45 of the electricity act, 2003. section 48 enables the distribution licensee to impose certain additional conditions when open access is permitted. 49. agreements with respect to supply or .....

Lanco Amarkantak Power Pvt. Ltd. Hyderabad Vs. Madhya Pradesh Electric ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

..... provides that the trading licensees which have been granted a licence by the central commission are deemed licensees and also the clause 4.2(a) as amended by the madhya pradesh regulations dated 21.12.2005 wherein it was provided that a trader who has obtained a trading licence from the central commission for ..... power of the state commission to adjudicate upon disputes between the licensees and the generating companies and to refer any dispute for arbitration. let us quote section 86 of the act now 86. functions of state commission. (1) the state commission shall discharge the following functions, namely:- (a) . (b) . (c) . (d) . (e) . (f) ..... commission would have jurisdiction to adjudicate upon every dispute between any generator and any licensee which could not have been the intention behind adjudicatory mechanism under the act. 30. a reference has been made by the learned counsel for the respondents to rule 9 as well as some clauses of regulations to strengthen their .....

M/S. Alok Ferro Alloys Ltd., Vs. the Chhattisgarh State Electricity Re ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction

..... conversion of 4mva connection on 132kv to 33kv and directed the respondent to comply the same after execution of supplementary agreement in this respect. petitioner in its amended petition of 44 of 2009 has prayed to maintain 8mva contract demand without any break in the period of supply. there is no provision in supply code ..... to continue the connectivity on 132 kv line by treating the power plant as an independent power plant and other consequential directions. in the light of the amended prayer, the state commission disposed of the said petition in op no.44 of 2009 accepting the request of the appellant/petitioner to have connectivity of their ..... basis, the state commission passed an order on 17.12.2009 referring to the stand taken by both the parties and gave directions to both the parties to act accordingly. the state commission in the said order directed for segregation of the appellants premises and separate connections along with the contract demands available for each such connection .....