Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: competition amendment act 2007 section 24 amendment of section 31 Sorted by: old Court: appellate tribunal for electricity aptel Page 1 of about 238 results (0.100 seconds)

Reliance Energy Limited Vs. Maharashtra Electricity

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Reported in : (2006)LCAPTEL543

..... vigilance debit--in case where a consumer is found to have indulged in dishonest abstraction of energy within the meaning of part xiv of the electricity act, 2003. rel raise amendment bills under the following circumstances: o reading correction--where bills were sent based on over-reading/under-readings, bills in the subsequent months are ..... period 10^th june, 2003, the date of coming into force of the electricity act, 2003 and up to 20^th january, 2005 the date of enforcement of supply code, 2005. the distribution licensees have been directed to withdraw all such supplementary/amendment bills on the premises (i) that meter testing has not been duly carried ..... came to be repealed in terms of section 185 of the electricity act, 2003.10. the merc, by its letter dated 3^rd august 2004, addressed all distribution licensees, which reads thus: 1. several instances have come to the commission's notice of so-called "amendment"/"supplementary" or other such bills being raised by some licensees to .....

Reliance Energy Limited Vs. the Tata Power Company Limited and

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Reported in : (2006)LCAPTEL662

..... to any consumer other than such licensees in bulk within their respective areas of supply. on 23^rd october, 1964, the expression "other licensee" has been amended and it reads thus: the expression "other licensees" shall mean any person or persons (other than the licensees) who are duly authorised by a license for ..... of contravention of terms and conditions of their license, it is submitted that tata power holds four licenses issued by government of maharashtra, which have been amended from time to time.according to tata power, they are also entitled to engage or undertake retail supply of electricity as they are also licensed to ..... to take into account, many other factors, the provision of a level playing field and stimulates competitive conditions and introduce such conditions progressively.10. the commission considered various options in the light of the provisions of the electricity act, 2003 and after considering section 42, section 22, section 14 and other connected provisions and .....

Reliance Energy Limited Vs. the Tata Power Company Ltd. and

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Reported in : (2006)LCAPTEL478

..... tpc offering a lower tariff even to some consumers whose maximum demand was less than 1000 kva and rel was compelled to loose those categories by the unfair competition, besides incurring revenue loss. only to maintain the customers' sales rebate was offered and even after the rebate rel charged lesser than the higher cost of ..... recover from the consumers the entire amount that was illegally offered as rebate, either through its periodical bills or otherwise by withdrawing earlier bills and preferring amended bills at authorized tariff rates. tpc also prayed for a direction to restrain rel from granting any rebate or discount to its consumers in any form ..... . the said schedule prescribed the manner, modalities and circumstances under which the charges for electricity supply can be made. in terms of the electricity regulatory commissions act, 1998, the commission fixes a tariff taking into consideration of various factors as prescribed in section 29 read with schedule vi. in case of any excess .....

Siel Limited Vs. the Punjab State Electricity

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Reported in : (2006)LCAPTEL931

..... an ex-chief minister of the state of maharashtra, was charged with criminal offences triable under criminal law amendment act, 1952 (for short 1952 act). the appellant could not be tried in accordance with the 1952 act because of the earlier order of the supreme court directing the transfer of his case pending before the court ..... generating companies and transmission licensees; (b) the generation, transmission, distribution and supply of electricity are conducted on commercial principles; (c) the factors which would encourage competition, efficiency, economical use of the resources, good performance and optimum investments; (d) safeguarding of consumers' interest and at the same time, recovery of the cost ..... or cross subsidized. in order to give effect to this direction the work should commence within three months and completed by the end of march, 2007 by the board/discom.115. under section 65, state government can grant subsidy to any consumer or class of consumers in the tariff determined .....

Bses Rajdhani Power Ltd. Vs. Delhi Electricity Regulatory

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

..... electricity industry in an efficient, commercial, economic and competitive manner in the national capital territory of delhi. under section 3, the delhi electricity regulatory commission has been constituted to exercise the powers conferred on it and to perform the functions assigned to it under the said act.9. section 11 enumerates the functions of the ..... from rs.2600 crore to rs.3450 crore based on assumptions about key parameters which were not provided to the commission at the time of issuance of amendment to the policy directions. subsequently, the gnctd provided the copy of financial restructuring plan prepared at the time of privatization upon a specific request from ..... as if the same is repayable or to be realized or salvaged or set off during the transitory period, viz., the period ending with 31st march, 2007, unless an extraordinary tariff upward revision is to be allowed. in fact no amortization schedule and other details been provided for. same challenge squarely applies even .....

Chhattisgarh Biomass Energy Vs. Chhattisgarh State Electricity

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Reported in : (2006)LCAPTEL711

..... and wheeling charges from 3 per cent to 6 per cent irrespective of the distance from the generating station. the open-access under the act is conceived to introduce competition so that consumers get power at competitive rates.it is an acknowledged fact supported by nep that biomass-energy sources for sometime in future cannot compete with conventional sources of energy in ..... compensate cseb towards line losses etc. for the power wheeled.5. the government of chhattisgarh vide an order no. 33/510/ed/02-03 dated 4^th february, 2003 amended the above notification to provide the following: (a) cseb will have to purchase the power at rs. 2.25 per unit if the developers are desirous of selling the ..... wheeling charges to be fixed by cseb (later fixed at 3 per cent). 4^th february, 2003--by an order 33/510/e.d/02-03, the state government amended the earlier notification to provide that the cseb will have to purchase the power at rs. 2.25 per unit if the developer is desirous of selling the power to .....

Rithwik Energy Systems Limited Vs. Transmission Corporation of

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Reported in : (2008)LCAPTEL237

..... the petitioner has no obligation to purchase excess delivered energy from the respondent at any point of time in terms of the provisions of ppa. e. to amend the agreement by including the condition mentioned above.18. thus, it is clear from the reliefs sought by the first respondent that its representation/promise to the ..... principle retrospectively from december, 2003, moved a petition, being o.p. no.12 of 2006, purportedly under section 62 and 86 (1)(f) of the electricity act, 2003 read with regulations 8 and 9 of aperc conduct of business regulations, 1999 before the aperc. in the petitions the aptransco sought the following reliefs: b. ..... granted the requisite sanction on march 1, 2000. the appellant also sought permission of the aperc under section 21(4) of the andhra pradesh electricity reform act for selling energy to the first respondent, aptransco, the then bulk supplier licensee.the commission in its regulatory jurisdiction approved the format of power purchase agreement between .....

Tata Power Company Limited Vs. Reliance Energy Limited

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Reported in : (2007)LCAPTEL1080

..... instantaneous management of outages have arisen. it is for the legislature to undertake suitable legislative measures at the earliest in the interest of emerging competitive market by introducing amendments.38. there is no doubt that the "stand-by" being provided by the appellant to the first respondent is an "ancillary service". ..... value of such ancillary services. the learned counsels appearing on either side are unable to lay their hands to any specific provison in the 2003 act. this is because hitherto the entire system, be it independent or interconnected were wholly owned and operated by state undertakings or central undertakings and ..... it is unnecessary to devolve or take upon the said expression herein for consideration.30. the expression "generation", "transmission", "distribution" are defined in the electricity act 2003 and also in the enactments which have been repealed and their popular meaning is well understood. the meaning of "basic service" and "ancillary service" requires to .....

Gajendra Haldea S/O Late Shri Rao Vs. Central Electricity Regulatory

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Reported in : (2008)LCAPTEL203

..... transmission of electricity; (iii) wheeling of electricity; and (iv) retail sale of electricity. this interpretation seems to be in conformity with the purpose of the act as it will encourage competition and will give fillip to the generation of electricity. it will unleash the energy sector which was hitherto strangled and strangulated by controls. it is this evil ..... section by the state commission having jurisdiction in respect of the licensee who intends to distribute electricity and make payment therefor: (6) a tariff order shall, unless amended or revoked, shall continue to be in force for such period as may be specified in the tariff order.35. thus, it is clear from a reading ..... interprets the law and cannot legislate it. if a provision of law is misused and subjected to the abuse of process of law, it is for the legislature to amend, modify or repeal it, if deemed necessary. (see rishabh agro industries ltd. v. p.n.b. capital services ltd.). the legislative casus omissus cannot be .....

The Rpp Limited Vs. Transmission Corporation of A.P.

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Reported in : (2007)LCAPTEL56

..... of the schedule of the existing consumers. in the application, it is stated that the appellant is making frequent applications for change in the schedule of consumers. for amendment of the schedule of the existing consumers a detailed procedure is involved. it is pointed out that in case a nce developer is in the area of one discom ..... reliance was placed by the learned counsel for the respondent nor the same is in keeping with the spirit of the act, which requires fillip to be given to open access and wheeling of electricity to generate competition. learned counsel for the respondent also invited our attention to clauses 16.1 and 16.2 of the aperc (terms ..... of the parties to the schedule of the existing consumers cannot be treated as mandatory direction at all. it was also stated that the provisions of the electricity act, 2003 do not provide for any period for disposal of the applications of the nce developers and only ppas provide for addition of parties to the agreements depending upon .....