Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Delhi
..... submitted by the learned senior counsel for the appellant that after passing of the order, dated july 11, 2006, by us, the commission took steps to amend the regulations with a view to bypass our judgment. we have considered the contention but we find that no evidence has been adduced to show that the steps ..... is the 33 kv distribution system on which the electricity is being rolled to the appellant. no further elaboration is required. 15. the commission ought to have acted in consonance with the aforesaid decision of the tribunal. both judicial discipline and propriety require the commission to comply with the orders of the tribunal, irrespective of ..... and lt consumers, and is, thus, unjustly been levied with a surcharge. such cross-subsidization or levying of surcharge is neither contemplated nor permissible in the electricity act, 2003 specially with respect to wheeling of captive power. j. wheeling charges for open access is determined under clause 14.3 (b) of the west bengal electricity .....
Tag this Judgment!