Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: competition amendment act 2007 section 18 omission of section 23 24 and 25 Sorted by: recent Court: madhya pradesh Page 8 of about 1,317 results (0.137 seconds)

Apr 04 1966 (HC)

Straw Products Limited Vs. Income-tax Officer, 'A' Ward and Ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1967MP34; [1967]63ITR689(MP)

..... account.' 4. the ordinance of 1949 was replaced by the taxation laws (extension to merged states and amendment) act, 1949, (hereinafter referred to as the 1949-act). section 3 of this act extended inter alia the indian income-tax act, 1922, along with all the rules and orders made thereunder, to all the merged states with effect ..... that resemblance, following the decision of the supreme court in ramgopal mills case. : [1961]41itr280(sc) , it cannot be held that the 1962 order substantially amends the indian income-tax act, 1922. 19. learned counsel referred us to the observations made by the supreme court : [1961]41itr280(sc) in the the case of ramgopal mills, ..... laws (part b states) (removal of difficulties) order, 1950. in our opinion, the contention that the impugned 1962 order is invalid inasmuch as it substantially amends the indian income-tax act, 1922, is concluded by the decision of the supreme court in ramgopal mills case, : [1961]41itr280(sc) and must, therefore, be rejected. 20. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 1963 (HC)

Naraindas Lalchand Vs. Income-tax Officer

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1963MP247; [1963]49ITR768(MP); 1963MPLJ353

..... m/s. ramadhin bhagwatdin. this is clear from the very plain language of sub-section (5) and the object with which that clause was incorporated in the act by the income-tax (amendment) act, 1953 (act no. 25 of 1953). sub-section (5) of section 35 is as follows:'(5) where in respect of any completed assessment of a partner in a firm ..... in the assessment of the firm m/s ramadhin bhagwatdin, the income-tax officer, satna, revised the assessment of each of the petitioners, under section 35(5) of the act, for the year 1955-56 by including the share of his profits in the firm m/s. ramadhin bhagwatdin and made the impugned orders of assessment.4. shri jagdishswaroop, learned ..... of each of the petitioners is for the issue of a writ of certiorari for quashing an order of rectification of assessment under section 35 of the indian income-tax act, 1922, passed against him by the income-tax officer, satna, on 31st december 1960.3. the material facts are these. the assessment of the firm m/s. udhoji shri .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 22 1961 (HC)

Nandlal Bhandari Mills Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Madhya Pra ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : [1962]45ITR468(MP)

..... acquired in any year before the accounting year, the actual cost less the aggregate of all depreciation actually allowed to the assessee under the income-tax act or any act repealed thereby. as the supreme court pointed out in commissioner of income-tax v. dewan bahadur ramgopal mills ltd. the loss relating to income- ..... assessee contended before the income-tax officer that the written down value should be determined only on the basis of the depreciation allowed under the income-tax act as the removal of difficulties order, 1950, was ultra vires. this contention was rejected by the income-tax officer.the contentions were unsuccessfully repeated in appeal ..... the expression 'less all depreciation actually allowed to him under this act, or any act repealed thereby' used therein would in an assessment made under the act mean the depreciation allowance taken into account in computing the total world income, such an order would have amounted to an amendment of section 10(5) (b) and would have been .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 25 1961 (HC)

Jagdish NaraIn Babulal Jaiswal Vs. Collector and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1962MP146

..... therein was requisitioned within the meaning of article 31, the operation of article 19 was excluded. but there is no scope for drawing such analogy after the constitution (fourth amendment) act, 1955, as thereafter they dealt with two different subjects : article 31(2) and (2a) with acquisition and requisition and article 31(1) with deprivation of property by ..... 97. moreover it may also become necessary that the government should hold adequate stock of food-grains to prevent prices from soaring high due to cut-throat trade competition and cornering.98. for both the above reasons acquisition of food-grains and their storage clearly becomes a public purpose in the sense of purpose in which the ..... of new south wales, 1950 ac 235 at p. 311 observed:'.... their lordships do not intend to lay it down that in no circumstances could the exclusion of competition so as to create a monopoly either in a state or commonwealth agency or in some other body be justified. every case must be judged on its 'own .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 17 1961 (HC)

Satish Kumar Sahu Manmohanlal Sahu Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and ors ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1961MP280

..... value of any land situate in bhopal area, in respect of which the date of publication of the notification aforesaid is after the commencement of the land acquisition (madhya pradesh amendment) act, 1957 (21 of 1958), is in excess of its market-value as on the 1st day of october, 1955, the market-value thereof shall be deemed to be ..... state of west bengal v. bon behari mondal, air 1961 cal 112.3. there is no force in this contention. after the amendment of clause (2) of article 31 of the constitution by the constitution (fourth amendment) act, 1955, a law with regard to the acquisition of property for a public purpose and providing for compensation for the acquisition cannot be ..... not hit by article 14 of the constitution.6. for all these reasons, our conclusion is that,the land acquisition (madhya pradesh amendment) act, 1959, (act no. 5 of 1959), is a valid piece oflegislation and that this petition must be dismissed.the petition is accordingly dismissed with costs.counsel's fee is fixed .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 23 1958 (HC)

K.S. Nazar Ali Mills Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Sales Tax

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1958MP282; [1959]10STC117(MP)

..... prepayment of tax assessed, has refused to exercise jurisdiction conferred upon him under section 12 of the sales tax act of samvat 2007? 2. whether section 12 of the sales tax act before the amendment act of sales tax act conferred on the petitioner a right to file a revision application without depositing an assessed amount of tax and if ..... preferred'. this section, as originally enacted, did not contain the third proviso to sub-section (2). it 'was inserted by the madhya bharat sales tax (fifth amendment) act 1955 which came into force on 15-4-1955. the petitioning mills, who were assessed to sales tax, did not appeal against the assessment. they, however, filed ..... that the discretionary revisional jurisdiction of the commissioner under section 12 (2) which is subject to certain limitations introduces an alternative category of remedy akin to and competitive with the remedy o an appeal under section 11.the words 'may on application for revision of an order by a dealer', when read in the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 26 2013 (HC)

Burn Standard Company Ltd. Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... may be quashed. (14) w.p.no.593/2010 has been preferred by the petitioner company on the basis of same set of facts challenging order dated 23.1.2007 issued by respondent no.2, by which it was held that the right in leased property shall be deemed to be surrendered in favour of the state, the patta of ..... the year 1907. another land (which is not in dispute in this petition) was obtained by the company on lease vested in the company under section 4 of the nationalization act, 1976. as the company was in loss and it was difficult for its continuation, it was referred to bifr under section 15(1) of the sick industrial companies (special ..... . (2) the petitioner is a government of india undertaking and is a subsidiary of bharat bhari udyog nigam limited. the petitioner is also registered as a company under the companies act, 1956, having registered office at 22-b, raja santosh road, kolkata. (3) the petitioner has challenged order annexure p-6 dated 21.04.2005, issued by the collector (nazul) .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 19 2013 (HC)

Sukhdeo Vs. the State of M.P.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... ) respectively.40. shri sisodiya (pw-14) the investigation officers further stated that he arrested appellant sukhdeo and on his information memo (ex.p/1) under section 27 of the evidence act, seized churi (knife), alleged to have been used in commission of the crime, as per seizure memo (ex.p/4) in presence of witnesses. hostile witness godilal (pw-1) only .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 17 2013 (HC)

Rakesh Tiwari Vs. the State of M.P.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... payment of fine, further rigorous imprisonment for 6 months. appellants smt. kusumlata tiwari and ku. snehlata tiwari have further been convicted under section 4 of the dowry prohibition act and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for 3 years. all the jail sentences have been directed to run concurrently. 3 cr.a.no.1429/2005 cr.a.no.1431/ ..... and ku. snehlata tiwari under section 498-a i.p.c. and conviction of appellants smt. kusumlata tiwari and ku. snehlata tiwari under section 4 of the dowry prohibition act is concerned, it rests mainly on the evidence of naval kishore (pw-13), shyam kishore (pw-1), ramkishore (pw-9) and basant kumar dixit (pw-11). these ..... . sentence of fine is affirmed. conviction and sentence awarded to appellants no.2 smt. kusumlata tiwari and no.3 ku.snehlata tiwari under section 4 of the dowry prohibition act is affirmed. their bail bonds and surety bonds stand discharged. a copy of this judgment be kept in the record of criminal appeal no.1431/2005. (rakesh saksena) .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 15 2013 (HC)

Surendra Singh Baghel Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... of the appellants on absolutely false grounds or for any extraneous motive.31. as further propounded in gurmit singh s case, - the provisions of evidence act regarding relevancy of facts notwithstanding, some defence counsel adopt the strategy of continual questioning of the prosecutrix as to the details of the rape. the victim ..... "12. accordingly, the entry in the scholar register duly proved by its scriber namely shakuntala namdeo (pw9) was admissible under section 35 of indian evidence act as evidence to determine the age of the prosecutrix (pw11).13. moreover, the entry in the scholar register further derived support from the opinion of dr ..... and kalli @ kalawati (pw4). (vii) non-supportive medical evidence as to rape. (viii) obvious inference from the surrounding facts and the circumstances that the sexual acts in question were consensual in nature. (ix) probability of the defences. in response, learned panel lawyer, while making reference to the incriminating pieces of evidence, has .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //