Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: competition amendment act 2007 section 15 amendment of section 21 Court: uttaranchal Page 2 of about 79 results (0.256 seconds)

Aug 21 2004 (HC)

Manmohan Singh Sharma Vs. Additional District Judge and ors.

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : 2005(1)ARC79

..... apex court in ganpat roy v. additional district magistrate page 1635 has observed as under:under the proviso to section 16 (1), which was inserted by the 1976 amendment act, the district magistrate is required in the case of a vacancy referred to in sub-section (4) which includes a deemed vacancy under section 12 (2) to ..... in the said sub-section which may have been let out by him before the commencement of the uttar pradesh urban buildings (regulation of letting, rent and eviction) (amendment) act, 1976 to apply under clause (a) of sub-section (1) of section 21 for the eviction of his tenant from such building, notwithstanding that such building is ..... no vacancy can be declared of which the petitioner is in unauthorized occupation. he has submitted that only remedy lies in civil court.12. section-11 of the act no. 13 of 1972 contains complete prohibition to occupy without allotment order. section-11 reads as under:-'11. prohibition of letting without allotment order:- save as hereinafter .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 01 2007 (HC)

New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Sofia Khatoon and ors.

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : [2008(116)FLR355]; (2008)IILLJ47UC

..... 3,750/- per month. as per explanation ii of section 4 (b) the word two thousand rupees has been substituted by four thousand rupees vide workmen's compensation (amendment) act, 2000 but the commissioner has taken rs. 3,750/- for assessment of the amount of compensation, which cannot be said to be illegal or excessive.11. the commissioner ..... 12% per annum from the date of accident. the relevant provision is quoted below:4(3) where any employer is in default in paying the compensation due under this act; within one month from the date it fell due, the commissioner shall:(a) direct that the employer shall, in addition to the amount of the arrears, pay ..... dated february 4, 2005 passed by the commissioner, workmen's compensation, pithoragarh.3. claimant respondent nos. 1 and 2 have filed a claim petition under workmen compensation act, for the grant of compensation on account of the death of their son saman ali in an accident. according to the claimants their son was employed in the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 27 2007 (HC)

New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Javitri Devi and ors.

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : 2009ACJ1982

..... . act, the intention of parliament has to be seen. statement of objects and reasons to amending act 54 of 1994 are as follows:(5) the law commission in its 119th report had recommended ..... is a distant place.12. sub-section (2) of section 166 was added by the amending act 54 of 1994. while deciding the jurisdiction of the tribunal under sub-section (2) of section 166 of the m.v ..... claimant. the bill also makes necessary provision to give effect to the said recommendation.13. the aim and object of introducing this amendment is quite obvious that parliament has an intention in their mind to mitigate the difficulties of the claimants who seek the compensation for ..... learned tribunal has erred in holding that it has got the jurisdiction to decide the claim petition.10. section 166 (2) of the act provides as under:every application under sub-section (1) shall be made, at the option of the claimant, either to the claims .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 23 2006 (HC)

UdasIn Panchayati Bara Akhara Kankhal and ors. Vs. Mahant Dooj Dass (D ...

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : 2006(3)AWC2358

..... appeal under section 100 and had burdened the high courts with an unnecessarily large number of second appeals. section 100 was, therefore, suggested to be amended so as to provide that the right of second appeal should be confined to cases where a question of law is involved and such question of ..... in the gazette can be read by the court under section 81 of indian evidence act, 1872. on behalf of the plaintiff/respondent, it is argued that without demarcation, there cannot be vesting of the agricultural area within the limits of municipality. ..... of u. p., and as from the beginning of that date, all such agricultural areas shall stand transferred to, and vest, except as provided in the said act, in the state, free from all encumbrances.serial no. name of urban area districtmeerut divisionmunicipality1. . .2. hardwar do saharanpurunion3. . .the aforesaid notification published .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 17 2006 (HC)

S.K. Srivastava and Etc. Vs. State of Uttaranchal

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : AIR2007Utr52

..... to the public, trade and industry by the development of motor transport,(b) the desirability of co-ordinating road and rail transport.(c) the desirability of preventing uneconomic competition among holders of permits, may from time to time, by notification in the official gazette, issue directions both to the state transport authority and regional transport authority: ..... for the petitioners have already been stated in the foregoing paragraphs of this judgment, it was contended by the learned advocate general that the amended provision (1-a) of the act is perfectly within the four corners of the legislative entry 57 of list ii of the seventh schedule of the constitution. he drew our ..... was enacted in the state of uttar pradesh, named as u.p. motor vehicles taxation act (act no. 21 of 1997), the provisions of which were amended in the year 2001 and vires of section (1-a) of the said act including the amendment of 2001 was challenged before the allahabad high court in the case of smt. vidya .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 18 2008 (HC)

Eveready Industries India Ltd. Vs. State of Uttarakhand and ors.

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : (2008)17VST18(NULL)

..... 21, 1997.5. after creation of new state of uttaranchal (now uttarakhand), the state government has adopted the act and the word 'uttaranchal' has been substituted in place of uttar pradesh therein. according to the petitioner, no amendment has been made in the notification dated february 21, 1997.6. the grievance of the petitioner is that ..... in the nature of mandamus be issued restraining/prohibiting respondent no. 3 from imposing any tax upon the petitioner for the assessment years 2005-2006 and 2006-2007 on the sales made by the petitioner within the state of uttaranchal of the goods manufactured in its new unit for which the eligibility certificate has been granted ..... in the nature of mandamus be issued restraining/prohibiting respondent no. 3 from imposing any tax upon the petitioner for the assessment years 2005-2006 and 2006-2007 on the sales made by the petitioner within the state of uttaranchal of the goods manufactured in its new unit for which the eligibility certificate has been .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 02 2010 (HC)

Ravindra Singh Bisht @ Dheeru @ Dheerendra Singh, and ors. Vs. the Sta ...

Court : Uttaranchal

..... is covered by the definition of "juvenile" in 18section 2(k) and the definition of "juvenile in conflict with law" in section 2(l) of the juvenile justice act, 2000, as amended.72. we, therefore, allow the appeal and set aside the order passed by the high court and in keeping with the provisions of sections 2(k), 2(l), ..... between 16 and 17 years.66. section 7a was introduced in the 2000 act and section 20 thereof was amended whereas rule 12 was included in the juvenile justice rules, 2007, which gave retrospective effect to the provisions of the juvenile justice act, 2000.67. section 7a of the juvenile justice act, 2000, made provision for the claim of juvenility to be raised before ..... 7a and 20 of the juvenile justice act, 2000 and rules 12 and 98 of the juvenile justice rules, 2007, hold that since the appellant was below 18 years of age .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 16 2003 (HC)

Bachan Lal Vs. State of Uttaranchal

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : AIR2004Utr23

..... were already there, it will not change the nature of the suit.14. order vi, rule 17, c. p. c. relates to the amendment of pleadings. rule 17 has further been amended and substituted by the c. p. c. (amendment) act 2002 with effect from 1-7-2002. the original rule 17 was as under :the court, may at any stage of the proceedings ..... be quashed, in other words since the quashing in not possible by the civil court and the suit can be brought only under the provisions of specific belief act, therefore, the plaintiff has sought amendment for declaring the same to be void. in other words the plaintiff was already conscious of the fact that the order dated 16-7-84 is null ..... allow either party to alter or amend his pleadings in such manner and on such terms as may be just, and all such amendments shall be made as .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 24 2004 (HC)

State of Uttaranchal Vs. Labour Court and anr.

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : [2004(101)FLR133]; (2004)2UPLBEC55

..... extended application of labour laws. sub-clause (bb) in the definition of retrenchment was introduced to take care of such like situations by the industrial disputes (amendment) act, 1984 with effect from 18.8.1984. the termination of service of a workman engaged in scheme or project may not amount to retrenchment within the meaning ..... definition of industry as occurring in section 2(j) of the act was amended by act 46 of 1982. though almost six years have elapsed since the amendment came on to the statute book, it has not been enforced yet. bare acts and commentaries on the industrial disputes act have, however, brought in the new definition by deleting the old ..... banglore water supply and sewerage board v. a. rajappa, was delivered almost two decades ago and the law has since been amended pursuant to that judgment through the date of enforcement of the amendment has not been notified.the judgment delivered by seven learned judges of this court in banglore water supply case does not, in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 20 2005 (HC)

Sanjeev Tyagi and ors. Vs. State of Uttaranchal and ors.

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : 2005(4)AWC3103(UHC)

..... signatures were fabricated. on said report under orders of respondent no. 3, respondent no. 4 vide his order dated 28.5.2004 directed the respondent no. 6 that the amendment made in the scheme of administration be cancelled and the membership of new members inducted by him, be declared invalid. thereafter, respondent no. 6 submitted list of 338 members ..... to continue for an indefinite period which is against the spirit of the scheme of administration of the institution approved under section 16 of the u. p. intermediate education act, 1921. this court is also bound to keep in mind the order passed on 27.6.2005 by a division bench in special appeal no. 31 of 2005 which ..... can be inducted as member for three years on payment of rs. 300 provided the said membership is duly approved under section 16 of the u. p. intermediate education act, 1921. it is alleged in the writ petition that respondent no. 6 illegally got inducted as many as 220 members in the .society between the period 10.10.2002 .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //