Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: competition amendment act 2007 section 15 amendment of section 21 Sorted by: recent Court: uttaranchal Page 1 of about 79 results (0.033 seconds)

May 12 2008 (HC)

Commissioner of Income Tax and anr. Vs. Desh Rakshak Aushdhalaya Ltd.

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : (2008)218CTR(Uttranchal)7; [2009]313ITR140(Uttaranchal); [2009]178TAXMAN453(NULL)

..... tribunal has erred in law in deleting the addition of rs. 2,98,924 on account of breach of section 43b of the it act, 1961, in spite of the fact that the amendment brought in said section vide finance act, 2003, had expressly no retrospective implementation5. before further discussion, we think it just and proper to mention here, the relevant provision of law ..... cannot be treated to be retrospective, as there is no express provision to this effect in the finance act, 2003, which indicates that the deletion would apply retrospectively. as against this, mr. s.k. posti, learned counsel for the respondent/assessee contended that the amendment by which second proviso to section 43b was deleted is curative in nature, and being explanatory has .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 10 2014 (HC)

Dr. Ved Prakash Tyagi Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Uttaranchal

..... and also order dated 19.07.2013 passed by respondent no. 3 i.e. principal secretary, department of medical education and ayush, dehradun. lastly, by an amendment in the writ petition he has also challenged the notification of the ministry of health and family welfare, government of india dated 27.07.2013 by which his seat ..... of ayurvedic education in the country?, the powers are with the central government and therefore, it is for this reason that under section 27 (2) of the central act has been incorporated making the central government, the ultimate authority, to dispense in such matters. 21. learned counsel for the board mr. paresh tripathi has also drawn ..... these circumstances, the matter went before the state government once again which was now to hear the appeal of the petitioner against his cancellation. section 43 of the state act under which appeal lies before the state government, reads as under:- 43. appeals to state government from decision of board (1) an appeal shall lie to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 30 2014 (TRI)

U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad, Through Its Sampati Prabandh Adhikari a ...

Court : Uttaranchal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Dehradun

..... of laxmi engineering works vs. p.s.g. industrial institute; ii (1995) cpj 1 (sc), has held that the benefit of section 14 of the limitation act, 1963 can be taken for excluding the period spent in prosecuting the earlier proceedings. in the present case, the complainant was bonafidely prosecuting the earlier proceedings and, ..... uc 1692, wherein it was held that the time spent before forum can be sought to be exempted under section 14 of the limitation act. learned counsel also cited a decision of the honble apex court in the case of ..... the limitation act, 1963 in respect of time bonafidely spent in earlier proceedings. therefore, the above decision cited does not extend any help to the revisionists. 11. learned counsel for respondent complainant cited a decision of the honble national commission in the case of simran roadlines vs. oriental insurance company limited and another; 2007 (3) .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 19 2012 (HC)

Sardar Abdul Wahid Khan Vs. District Judge Dehradun and Others

Court : Uttaranchal

..... filed its counter affidavit with the averment that present waqf has been registered under the provisions of uttar pradesh muslim waqf act, 1960, as amended by act no. 11 of 1974 and section 2 of the act provides that it applies to all waqfs. section-4 of the act provides for appointment of commissioner and addl. commissioner of waqfs. section 6(3) of the ..... al-aulad property for ` 3.50 crore and as per the said deed had already received ` 25 lakhs. the said agreement to sell was subsequently modified on 30-08-2007. 16. he submitted that the public record of the uttarakhand waqf board shows that the property in dispute is a waqf having a waqf deed, dedicated for purposes of ..... is not the case in the petitioners petition. he contended that the apex court in the matter of chhedi lal misra vs. civil judge, lucknow and others, reported in 2007 (4) scc-632 has held that "once a waqf is created, the waqif stands divested of his title to the properties which after the creation of the waqf vests .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 17 2012 (HC)

M/S. Garhwal Motor Owners Union Limited Vs. Presiding Officer, Labour ...

Court : Uttaranchal

..... india provides normal retirement date shall mean in respect of member the date on which he attains the age of 58 years. after the amendment dated 1-7-1984 of payment of gratuity act, 1972 by act no. 25 of 1984 the g.m.o.u.ltd. sharmik union in its general body meeting dated 31.3.1986 passed resolution no ..... , therefore, the orders of retirement at the age of 58 years in accordance with the provision of payment of gratuity act, 1972, are illegal. the learned labour court has observed that in the payment of gratuity act by amendment that age of superannuation would be such as is fixed either in the contract of service or in the conditions of ..... orders and the service will continue so long as the workmen are mentally and physically fit to discharge the duties assigned to them till the standing orders are suitably amended by the employer. accordingly, the learned labour court has held that the orders of dismissal of services of the workmen respondents were illegal and they were reinstated in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 09 2012 (HC)

Anil Kumar Saxena Vs. District Magistrate Nainital and Others

Court : Uttaranchal

..... the industrial tribunal, one months wages in lieu of the notice was paid to the petitioner as provided u/s 6-e (2) (b) of the u.p. industrial disputes act. simultaneously, the employer also moved an application before the industrial tribunal where adjudication case no. 9 of 1993 was pending for approval of their action. the petitioner, being aggrieved by ..... of assistant accountant grade-i. it transpires that the petitioner filed a review application which was rejected by an order dated 30th september, 2004. the petitioner, thereafter, filed an amendment application before this court praying that the orders dated 22/12/2003 and the review order dated 30th september, 2004 be quashed. the ..... amendment application was allowed and the prayers were incorporated. 4 in the light of the aforesaid, the court has heard shri m.c. kandpal, the learned senior counsel assisted by mr .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 15 2011 (HC)

Kamal Jora and Another Vs. State of Uttarakhand and Another

Court : Uttaranchal

..... for its first meeting and no longer: provided that a municipality shall be given a reasonable opportunity of being heard before its dissolution. (2) no amendment of any law for the time being in force shall have the effect of causing dissolution of a municipality at any level, which is functioning immediately before such ..... uttarakhandurban development section-ino.: 682/iv-i-2011-1(57) 2010dehradun : dated 29thjune, 2011public notice under section 3 sub-section (2) of uttar pradesh municipal corporation act, 1959 (u.p. act no. 2 of 1959) (as applicable in the state of uttarakhand) read with article 243 u of part 2, it is the considered opinion of the state ..... opinion that until the due constitution for such area under [the constitution], it is expedient so to do, then the state government may, notwithstanding anything contained in this act or any other law for the time being in force, by order direct that (a) [the municipal council] or any other local authority constituted for exercising .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 06 2010 (HC)

Dr. Himanshu S. Jha Vs. the Chancellor, Kumaun University and Others

Court : Uttaranchal

..... statute. 7. in so far as kumaun university is concerned, with which we are concerned in the present case, the first statute was made, whereupon the same was amended from time to time. in terms of the provisions contained in the said statute lecturers, who are p.hd. and have put in at least 13 years full time ..... as it may, it appears to us that the order impugned was made being influenced by the decision of the executive council taken on 31 st october, 2007. according to law contained in the act and the statute, it is the governing committee, who is to appoint and, accordingly, it is the governing committee, who is authorized by law, ..... and experience are some of the matters relating to universities contemplated in section 49 of the act, which may be provided in statutes. 6. section 50 of the act authorised the state government to make the first statute of universities. the power to amend the first statute though vests in the state government, the executive councils of the universities, while .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 02 2010 (HC)

Ravindra Singh Bisht @ Dheeru @ Dheerendra Singh, and ors. Vs. the Sta ...

Court : Uttaranchal

..... is covered by the definition of "juvenile" in 18section 2(k) and the definition of "juvenile in conflict with law" in section 2(l) of the juvenile justice act, 2000, as amended.72. we, therefore, allow the appeal and set aside the order passed by the high court and in keeping with the provisions of sections 2(k), 2(l), ..... between 16 and 17 years.66. section 7a was introduced in the 2000 act and section 20 thereof was amended whereas rule 12 was included in the juvenile justice rules, 2007, which gave retrospective effect to the provisions of the juvenile justice act, 2000.67. section 7a of the juvenile justice act, 2000, made provision for the claim of juvenility to be raised before ..... 7a and 20 of the juvenile justice act, 2000 and rules 12 and 98 of the juvenile justice rules, 2007, hold that since the appellant was below 18 years of age .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 26 2010 (HC)

Tata Sky Limited Vs. the State of Uttarakhand and ors.

Court : Uttaranchal

..... , that during the pendency of special appeal no. 21 of 2009, the uttarakhand legislative assembly enacted the uttarakhand (the uttar pradesh entertainment and betting tax act, 1979) (amendment) act, 2009 the aforesaid amendment was notified on 16.03.2009.. through the aforesaid enactment, the term 'direct-to-home' (dth) broadcasting was sought to be defined through section ..... on 'service'. while adjudicating upon the controversy, the supreme court in all india federation of tax practitioners and ors. v. union of india and ors. : (2007) 7 scc 527 categorized entries in the union list of the seventh schedule of the constitution of india in two groups i.e., general entries and taxing entries. ..... feature film or separately;8. in response to the assertions made at the hands of the petitioner company in writ petition (m/s) no. 2562 of 2007 and writ petition (m/s) no. 353 of 2008 the state of uttarakhand adopted the stance that entertainment tax could be levied by the uttarakhand legislature under .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //