Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: competition amendment act 2007 section 15 amendment of section 21 Court: himachal pradesh Page 6 of about 670 results (0.275 seconds)

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Laiq Ram and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : II(2005)ACC296,2006ACJ359

..... cases would be applicable in the present case.16. there is no merit in the contention of learned counsel for the appellant insurer. section 145 (d) of the act defines the 'policy of insurance'. it says that policy of insurance includes certificate of insurance. section 145 (b) defines 'certificate of insurance' as under:(b) 'certificate ..... insurance to cover the bus without receiving the premium therefor. by reason of the provisions of sections 147(5) and 149(1) of the motor vehicles act, the appellant became liable to indemnify third parties in respect of the liability which that policy covered and to satisfy the awards of compensation in respect thereof notwithstanding ..... can be maintained by the third party against the insurer.13. the learned counsel for the appellant insurer, placing reliance on section 64-vb of the insurance act, 1938, has contended that in view of the provisions contained therein, the appellant insurer could not in law have assumed any risk under the policy of .....

Soma Devi Vs. GuIn Devi and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : AIR2003HP158

..... prayers in the application is for leading additional evidence by way of production of report dated 21-3-1998 and the concerned patwari in evidence. before the recent amendment of the code of civil procedure, a party to a suit could be allowed to lead additional evidence if it satisfied the court that after due diligence such ..... get the signatures on such documents and the disputed signatures compared.13. it may also be pointed out here that an application under section 73 of the evidence act was earlier moved by the defendant for comparison of the disputed signatures on the will with the allegedly admitted signatures of the testator on a gift deed. the ..... petitioner/defendant (hereafter referred to as 'the defendant') under order 11 rule 12. order 18 rules 17. 17a of the code and section 73 of the indian evidence act in civil suit no. 32 of 2000 has been dismissed.2. brief facts leading to the presentation of this revision petition are that the respondents/plaintiffs (hereafter referred to .....

Akshit Kumar Vs. Balbir Singh and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : III(2006)ACC40,2006ACJ2107

..... at the very outset it may be noted that section 163-a was introduced in motor vehicles act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as 'the act') by amendment act 54 of 1994 w.e.f. 14.11.1994. the purpose of introducing section 163-a of the act was to simplify the procedure and to make the tortfeasor and the insurance company liable even in ..... case no negligence could be proved. under section 163-a of the act the claimant is not required to ..... than a person who neither proves negligence nor proves the income of the deceased. according to note no. 6 under the second schedule framed under section 163-a of the act, notional income for compensation to those who had no income prior to the accident is to be taken at rs. 15,000 per annum. therefore, minimum compensation under .....

Gulam Ahmed Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : 2006CriLJ2361

..... culprit commences to do something with the intention of committing the offence and which is a step towards the commission of the offence. the moment he commences to do an act with the necessary intention, he commences his attempt to commit the offence. the word 'attempt' is not itself defined, and must, therefore, be taken in its ordinary meaning. ..... have been completed but for the intervening circumstance, i.e., calling of the mother of the victim who reached the spot before penetration could take place and therefore, the act of the accused would squarely fall under section 376 read with section 511 of the indian penal code.20. it is true mere intention to commit an offence, is ..... not crime unless such intention is followed by an act. mere intention is not suggestive of attempt.21. in this case, the accused with intent to commit rape to satisfy his lust laid the victim on the ground over .....

Mohinder Kumar Sood Vs. H.P. Public Service Commission and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1982HP78

..... were distributed. the laxity of the commission is evident from their admission that the copy of the hindu marriage act supplied to the candidates did not have the amendments affected by the marriage laws (amendment) act, 1976. it is indeed surprising that in a competition for the recruitment of future judicial officers the commission did not even bother to ensure that they were supplied bare ..... acts containing all the amendments up-to-date. the facts speak for themselves and we make no further comments.25. now the .....

Gopal Singh Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : 2006CriLJ2743

..... section 302 of the indian penal code and under section 27/54/59 of the arms act to which the accused pleaded not guilty. the prosecution examined as many as 23 witnesses in order to substantiate the charges against the accused. in his statement under ..... was presented in the court of learned additional chief judicial magistrate, una, under section 302 of the indian penal code and under sections 27/54/59 of the arms act, who vide order dated 29-11-2001 committed the case to the court of session for trial. the accused was charge-sheeted for having committed the offence under ..... prosecution, which led to the filing of the charge-sheet against the accused for the offences under section 302 of the indian penal code and section 27 of the arms act, is that the accused, who is stated to be originally a resident of ballachour in district nawanshehar (punjab), happened to have purchased land at village nangal kalan, una. .....

Prem Chand and Etc. Vs. Jagar Nathu and Etc.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : AIR2006HP78,2006(3)ShimLC177

..... fact, defendant no. 1 is in occupation of this land. he was continuously cultivating the land as tenant and after coming into force the h.p. tenancy and land reforms act has become its owner. it is denied that this land was given to the plaintiff or his predecessors in private family partition. according to these defendants, the predecessor-in-interest ..... the defendant/appellant was proved to be in possession of the suit property as a tenant having acquired the title by operation of the h.p. tenancy and land reforms act, was it competent for the courts below to have granted a decree for injunction in favour of the plaintiff/respondent?4. the relevant facts for the disposal of these appeals .....

Raman Kumar Vs. Smt. Uma Kiran

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : AIR2006HP63

..... disobeying the orders before taking such action.10. in the present case no such opportunity whatsoever was given to the offending spouse to make amends and in my opinion, the trial court has acted in a very hasty manner in striking off the defence of the husband on the first date when the wife's evidence was present, therefore ..... disobeyed the orders of the court, the court can strike off the defence. however, before taking such action, the offending spouse must be given an opportunity to make amends and pay the arrears. there may be cases where even though interim alimony has been awarded, the husband for various reasons, beyond his control, is unable to pay ..... husband could not be permitted to cross-examine the witnesses since the husband had not deposited the arrears of maintenance awarded to wife under section 24 of the hindu marriage act. the counsel for the husband immediately offered to deposit a sum of rs. 5000/- out of the amount of rs. 13000/- approximately due at that time.5. .....

Sher Singh Vs. Rakesh Kumar and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : 2006ACJ2367

..... he sued rakesh kumar as the sole proprietor of kaushal roller flour mills. thereafter even an application was moved during the pendency of the petition for amendment of the petition. this application was rejected on untenable ground. the learned commissioner rejected this application mainly on the ground that the application should have been ..... by technicalities of limitation and mis-description of parties. in this behalf, it would be relevant to refer to section 10a of the workmen's compensation act, which reads as follows:10-a. power to require from employers statements regarding fatal accidents.-- (1) where a commissioner receives information from any source that ..... no. 1, places reliance upon the judgment of the apex court in ramprasad dagaduram v. vijaykumar motilal hirakhanwala : air1967sc278 . section 21 of the limitation act reads as follows:21. effect of substituting or adding new plaintiff or defendant.--(1) where after the institution of a suit, a new plaintiff or defendant is .....

Hakim and anr. Vs. Santu and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

..... kalu ram (air 1973 him pra 81') (supra) has only considered one aspect, that the numbering of the section 15 and its sub-sections in the original act and the amended act remains the same. we, however, cannot contribute to this view simply on this ground.25. in our view the punjab division bench in praja ram's case ..... ) (b) and same reasoning will prevail.20. the notification of 1917 refers to the original section 15 of the punjab preemption act, 1913 and not the substituted and amended section 15 of the punjab pre-emption (amendment) act no. 10, of i960.21. the learned counsel for the respondents laid much reliance upon section 22 of the punjab general clauses ..... contentions of the learned counsel for the parties.12. it will be expedient to reproduce the original sec. 15 of the punjab preemption act, 1913 and also section 15 substituted by the punjab pre-emption (amendment) act no. 10 of 1960. original section 15 reads as under:--'15. subject to the provisions of section 14, the right of pre .....