Compense - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: compense Year: 2015 Page 1 of about 3,830 results (0.043 seconds)In the matter of The Companies Act, 1956 and the Companies Act, 2013 ( ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-10-2015
1 this joint application has been filed under sections 391 to 394 of the companies act 1956 by the applicant...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTIn the matter of the Companies Act, 1956 and the Companies Act, 2013 ( ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-02-2015
1 this joint application has been filed under section 391 1 of the companies act 1956 by the applicant companies...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/s. Goman Agro-Farms Private Ltd. and Others Vs. M/s. Nagavali Greenl ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-29-2015
common order 1 company petition no 179 of 2015 is filed by m s goman agro farms private limited transferor...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTIn the matter of The Companies Act, 1956 and the Companies Act, 2013 ( ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-05-2015
1 this joint petition has been filed under sections 391 2 and 394 of the companies act 1956 by the...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTEtisalat Mauritius Ltd. Vs. Etisalat DB Telecom Pvt. Ltd. and Others
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Feb-20-2015
1 company petition no 114 of 2012 is filed by the petitioner etisalat mauritius ltd for winding up of respondent...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/s. Jute Investment Company Ltd. and Another Vs. IDBI Capital Market ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-16-2015
1 by way of this common order i propose to decide the two applications filed by the two respective plaintiffs...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTEnercon GmbH, Germany Vs. Wind World (India) Limited, Daman and Others ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Aug-20-2015
introduction 1 these two company appeals arise from the common order passed by the company law board mumbai bench mumbai...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTB.V. Nafan and Others Vs. SAF Yeast Company Pvt. Ltd. and Others
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Oct-29-2015
administrator shall be entitled to appoint at an appropriate monthly compensation to be paid by the company as the administrator deems
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSupermax Personal Care Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Vidyut Metallics Pvt. Ltd. and Ot ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Nov-30-2015
that the above appeal therefore deserves to be dismissed with compensatory costs 10 before dealing with the above contention of spcpl
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTIn the matter of the Companies Act, 1956 and the Companies Act, 2013 ( ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-10-2015
1 this joint petition has been filed under sections 391 to 394 of the companies act 1956 by the petitioner...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial