Compense - Judgment Search Results

B.S.M. Ganganna Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: ILR1986KAR3359; 1987(1)KarLJ21

held liable either jointly or severally to pay the closure compensation or other claims of the workmen the industry is liable

In Re: the Central India Spinning, Weaving and Mfg. Co. Ltd.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (1986)88BOMLR226

the assets and properties of the company nor claim any compensation in that behalf and what is more the house of

Narotamdas Trikamdas Toprani Vs. Bombay Dyeing and Manufacturing Co. L ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (1986)88BOMLR649; [1990]68CompCas300(Bom)

1 the plaintiff is a debenture holder in the bombay dyeing and mfg co ltd the first defendant herein he...

Registrar of Companies Vs. Jaipur Stock Exchange Ltd.

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: [1987]62CompCas459(Raj); 1987WLN(UC)372

p c jain j 1 the registrar of companies rajasthan jaipur has filed this petition under section 439 5 read...

Central Distillery Ltd. Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 1987(12)DRJ27

mahinder narain j 1 the question in this writ petition is whether the guarantee commission which has been paid to...

Exxon Corp. Vs. Hunt

Court: US Supreme Court

..... preempts only taxes to support state funds for which the purpose is to compensate for claims compensable under superfund in accordance with this language contributions to state funds would be ..... spills within its definition of hazardous substance releases nor is superfund money available to compensate private parties for economic harms that result from discharges of hazardous substances rather it .....

Memphis Comm. Sch. Dist. Vs. Stachura

Court: US Supreme Court

..... circumstances presumed damages may roughly approximate the harm that the plaintiff suffered and thereby compensate for harms that may be impossible to measure as we earlier explained the ..... circuit held that that injury to a first amendment protected interest could itself constitute compensable injury wholly apart from any emotional distress humiliation and personal indignity emotional pain .....

Pennsylvania Vs. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council

Court: US Supreme Court

..... its counsel s work sufficiently related to the litigation to be compensable as to phase v the district court based on the superior ..... that made its work sufficiently related to the litigation to be compensable see id at 1423 1429 1430 after determining the lodestar ..... circuit expressly found that the 100 hourly rate for the attorney compensated for the 210 hours was plainly appropriate given that he .....

City of Riverside Vs. Rivera

Court: US Supreme Court

..... petitioners first the court rejected petitioners contention that respondents counsel should not have been compensated for time spent litigating claims other than those upon which respondents ultimately prevailed ..... under the circumstances id at 190 nevertheless petitioners suggest that respondents counsel should be compensated for only a small fraction of the actual time spent litigating the case .....

Library of Congress Vs. Shaw

Court: US Supreme Court

..... and significantly for present purposes the court increased the adjusted lodestar by 30 percent to compensate counsel for the delay in receiving payment for the legal services rendered id at ..... 268 ca6 1983 declining to award a delay adjustment because the attorneys had been adequately compensated but recognizing the availability of delay adjustments in appropriate cases chrapliwy v uniroyal inc 670 .....