Skip to content


Compatible - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: compatible Year: 2016 Page 1 of about 48 results (0.079 seconds)
Feb 26 2016 (HC)

M/s. Hindustan Unilever Ltd., Bangalore Vs. The State of Karnataka, Ba ...

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Feb-26-2016

prayer these petitions are filed under section 65 1 of kvat act against the judgment and order dated 05 07...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 26 2016 (HC)

M/S. Hindustan Unilever Ltd Vs. The State of Karnataka

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Feb-26-2016

1 r in the high court of karnataka at bengaluru dated this the26h day of february2016present the hon ble mr...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 23 2016 (HC)

Commissioner of Income Tax Delhi-Xi and Another Vs. Indian National Co ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-23-2016

dr s muralidhar j introduction 1 1 more than four decades ago while noting the distortion that large contributions of...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 15 2016 (HC)

Nirmala Sinha Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors.

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Mar-15-2016

1 in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi w p s no 6586 of 2010 nirmala sinha wife of...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 11 2016 (SC)

Jindal Stainless Ltd. and Anr. Vs. State of Haryana and Ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Nov-11-2016

..... of the opinion that the compensatory theory as evolved in automobile transport supra is not compatible to the constitutional scheme and a compensatory tax legislation cannot be insulated from challenge ..... no 3 the compensatory tax theory as judicially evolved in automobile transport is not compatible to constitutional scheme as delineated by part xiii of the constitution the automobile transport .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 16 2016 (HC)

Jyoti Sawroop Arora Vs. The Competition Commission of India and Others

Court: Delhi

Decided on: May-16-2016

..... not such an order was appealable before the competition appellate tribunal compat 3 the counsels drew attention to section 53a 1 a of ..... direction decision or order where under the remedy of appeal to compat has been provided is as under 6 if after consideration ..... question aforesaid of availability of appeal against the impugned order to compat this court rather than spending time on hearing on the said .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 30 2016 (HC)

Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (Publ) Vs. Competition Commission of I ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-30-2016

..... 9 the use of a standard technology ensures that there is a uniformity and compatibility in communications network across various countries thus any technology accepted as a standard would ..... all market participants involved in the industry must necessarily work on technologies that are compatible for seamless communication products and equipments used in the telecommunication industry must conform to .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 23 2016 (HC)

Myspace Inc. Vs.super Cassettes Industries Ltd.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Dec-23-2016

..... that it can be converted into a format which is compatible with the website thus it is through this agreement that ..... hardware technology makes internet access easy most hardware devices are internet compatible further the increase in geographical coverage and internet speed 3rd ..... core system with the only purpose of making the content compatible with the webpage this being the case the argument by .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 22 2016 (HC)

T.K.S. Elangovan and Others Vs. The State of Tamil Nadu rep. by its Ch ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Dec-22-2016

..... public service commission simply does not arise nor does the issue of compatibility the chairperson of a public service commission does not function at the ..... the goods as it were and both are administratively quite compatible with each other if there is a loss of confidence or the ..... compatibility comes to an end the appointee may simply be shifted out .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 23 2016 (HC)

Prius Auto Industries Ltd & Ors vs.toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Dec-23-2016

..... reasonably necessary in order to indicate that the goods so adapted are compatible with the goods sold under the trade mark as per the ..... it being reasonably necessary to indicate that the goods so adapted are compatible for the toyota motor vehicles the only fault found by the ..... possible that manner of representation to write that the goods are compatible may appear to one as a trade mark use and to .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //