Compatible - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: compatible Year: 2002 Page 1 of about 69 results (0.024 seconds)New York Vs. Ferc
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Mar-04-2002
new york v ferc 535 u s 1 2002 cases adjudged in the supreme court of the united states at...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTExecutive Engineer, Penstock Fabrication and Erection Division, Cuddap ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-11-2002
Reported in: 2002(3)ALD516; (2002)IIILLJ1AP
s r nayak j 1 the government of andhra pradesh represented by its secretary irrigation and power department and other...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Central Excise Vs. Birla Corporation Ltd.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Aug-22-2002
Reported in: (2002)(146)ELT215TriDel
1 these are appeals filed by the revenue against the orders passed by the commissioner appeals appeal nos e 691...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThompson Vs. Western States Medical Center
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Apr-29-2002
thompson v western states medical center 535 u s 357 2002 october term 2001 syllabus thompson secretary of health and...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAsstt. Cit Vs. Pallawi Resources Ltd.
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Kolkata
Decided on: May-11-2002
Reported in: (2004)86TTJ(Kol.)579
this appeal filed by the revenue is directed against commissioner appeals s order for the assessment year 1990 91 solitary...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTEast West Rescue (P) Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi
Decided on: Mar-13-2002
Reported in: (2002)81ITD160(Delhi)
1 the appeal has been filed by the assessee against the order of the cit a dt 29th dec 1998...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBallarpur Industries Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise and
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Jul-03-2002
1 the appellant company received during 1996 97 various items of capital goods required to manufacture coloured coated paper the...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTG.S. Enterprises Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Mar-06-2002
Reported in: (2002)(144)ELT387TriDel
..... takes no part it is not even an accessory inasmuch as these blades are not compatible with the razor this razor is for one time use and is discarded thereafter the ..... even an accessory for the disposable twin blade razor as blade in question is not compatible with the razor in these circumstances we agree with the revenue that the blades cannot .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBaby George and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam
Decided on: Jul-12-2002
Reported in: (2004)(1)SLJ339CAT
..... we are not called upon to consider the merit position obtaining in a uniform and compatible competitive examination for all the aspiring candidates to be recruited promoted to the category of ..... examinations were held in 1990 we notice that the candidates are all drawn from non compatible groups they are recruited promoted as jtos the technological knowledge and expertise essential for the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNutan Kumar and ors. Vs. Iind Additional District Judge and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-27-2002
Reported in: AIR2002SC3456; 2003(1)AWC213(SC); JT2002(7)SC481; RLW2003(1)SC141; 2002(7)SCALE81; (2002)8SCC31; [2002]SUPP2SCR686
..... as follows with utmost humility and reverence it is stated that above observations are not compatible with provisions of section 10 and 23 of the contract act otherwise also it is ..... it was not open for the full bench to comment that the authority was not compatible with provisions of sections 10 and 23 of the contract act the full bench also .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial