Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: company secretaries act 1980 section 21a board of discipline Page 1 of about 21 results (0.086 seconds)

Kanchan India Limited Vs. Karnataka Power Corporation Limited

Court : Karnataka

..... the authorization in favour of the undersigned is attached and marked annexure 'c'. thanking you, yours faithfully, for emta coal limited sd/- tapan kumar basak company secretary enc: as above (emphasis added) therefore, the petitioners did clarify about the position of those two directors who had suffered such conviction. after the said ..... puts on record it s appreciation for the services rendered by sri bikash mukherjee during his tenure with the company. resolved further that any director of the company or sri tapan k.basak, company secretary be and is hereby authorized severally to file the necessary forms with the ministry of corporate affairs in respect ..... of the resignation of sri bikash mukherjee. 21 explanatory statement pursuant to section 102 of the companies act, 2013 item no.1 the .....

Ajit Kumar Doshi Vs. Institute of Company Secretaries of India and ors ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : (1990)2CALLT114(HC)

..... 's application for enrolment as an associate member was rejected.3. the company secretaries act, 1980 came into force on and from january, 1981. by the said act the institute of company secretaries of india which was incorporated under the companies act, 1956 stood dissolved. it is further claimed by the petitioner that none the less the company secretaries (qualification) rules, 1975 dated 7th march, 1975 and a notification dated 15th ..... also claimed by the petitioner that the petitioner's application was pending when the said company secretaries act, 1980 came into force in january, 1981. therefore, under section 32(4) of the said company secretaries act, 1980 (hereinafter referred to as the said act) which, inter alia, provides that if, on the commencement of this act, any suit, appeal or other legal proceedings of whatever nature by or against the .....

T.U. Khatri, Residing at 2/5 Yeshwant Nagar, Goregaon (West) Bombay-40 ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR2002Bom268; 2002(3)ALLMR27; 2002(4)BomCR733; (2002)3BOMLR847

..... to theinstitute and upon fulfilment of requisiteconditions including the no objection from the barcouncil of maharashtra, shri khatri was issuedcertificate of practice by the institute inaccordance with the company secretaries act, 1980( for short 'the act of 1980') and the companysecretaries regulations, 1982 ( for short 'theregulations') for the period from 31st october,1986 to 30th june, 1987. the certificate ofpractice issued to shri khatri was renewed ..... rival case set up by theparties and also considered the provisions of theact of 1980 and the regulations and some of therelevant provisions of the companies act, 1956.6. the company secretaries act, 1980 ( actof 1980) was made to provide for regulation anddevelopment of the profession of companysecretaries. section 2(1) defines variousexpressions, inter alia, 'company secretary' meansa person who is a member of the institute;'council' means the council .....

Nalinchandra Shankerlal Vaidya Vs. the Institute of Company Secretarie ...

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : AIR1992Guj140

..... . 1, the institute of company secretaries of india, which has been constituted under the company secretaries act, 1980. for the sake of convenience, i will refer to hereinafter to the institute of company secretaries of india which was registered under the companies act, as 'the erstwhile company'.2. the petitioner who holds the degrees of b ..... member of that institute. it may be mentioned at the outset that, that institute which was a company registered under the companies act, has since been dissolved by virtue of section 31 of the company secretaries act, 1980, which came into force on january 1, 1981, and its place has been taken by respondent no ..... 1 also contended that by virtue of s. 32(2) of the company secretaries act, 1980, no writ petition would lie against respondent no. 1, for there was no liability or obligation of the erstwhile company on the date the company secretaries act came into force, which would have devolved upon respondent no.1. the argument .....

Chatterjee Petrochem Vs. Haldia Petrochemicals Ltd. and

Court : Company Law Board CLB

Reported in : (2008)143CompCas726

..... regard to issuance of shares. by a notice dated 30.6.2005 under section 234(3)(a) of the act, roc directed the company to produce relevant books, papers, documents etc. on 11.7.2005. in response to that notice, the deputy company secretary produced before the roc all the relevant papers. all attempts of the 7^th respondent to convene a board meeting ..... 15,00,00,000 equity shares of the company as fully paid at par and the dy. company secretary be and is hereby authorized and instructed to do the needful in the manner forthwith, including encashment of cheque, issue of equity share in dematerialized form, filing of return of allotment and to do all such acts, deeds and things which may be necessary or .....

illinois Central R. Co. Vs. Illinois

Court : US Supreme Court

..... record in your office." the secretary of state replied, under date of november 18, 1870: "yours of the 17th ..... its president communicated a copy of this resolution to the secretary of state of illinois, and gave the notice therein required, adding: "you will please regard the above as an acceptance by this company of the above-mentioned law [lakefront act], and it is desired by said company that said acceptance shall remain permanently on file and of ..... inst., being a notice of the acceptance by the illinois central railroad company of the grants under an act of the legislature of illinois, in force april 16, 1869, was .....

In Re: Deutsche Babcock Power

Court : Company Law Board CLB

Reported in : (1999)97CompCas341

..... state of tamil nadu as approved by the special resolution passed in accordance with section 189 of the act at its extraordinary general meeting held on january 27, 1997.2. mr. k. krishnamurthy, practising company secretary and authorised representative for the petitioner, while reiterating the averments made in the petition as well as ..... that the company is indebted to the objector to the tune of rs. 89,89,447,29 in connection with supply of boilers ..... 91 comp cas 404 (clb) to state that the company law board cannot adjudicate claims and counter-claims between the company and its objector creditor. in the circumstances, he sought for the prayer as made in the petition.3. shri athas sen, practising company secretary and authorised representative appearing on behalf of the objector, submitted .....

Smt. Kaushalaya Atmaram Vs. Hotel Hiramani (P.) Ltd.

Court : Company Law Board CLB

..... consider and decide the eligibility of the persons as members/proxies to attend and vote at the meeting. 1. dr. s.d. israni, company secretary in whole time practice is hereby appointed as chairman for holding the extraordinary general meeting of the company, who has agreed to act as such, in accordance with law after serving notices to all the existing members of the ..... 186 of the companies act, 1956 ('the act') for an order for calling an extraordinary general meeting of the shareholders, for appointing the interim board of directors authorising them to register the transfer/transmission of shares of hotel hiramani p. ltd. (the respondent company) by the applicant in such a matter as this board thinks fit.2. dr. s.d. israni, the company secretary in whole .....

Highland Distilleries Ltd. and ors. Vs. Shaw Wallace Distilleries Ltd.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : (2006)2CompLJ455(All); [2007]76SCL352(All)

..... court2. that the official liquidator has received a copy of petition under section 391/394 of the companies act, 1956 for sanction of the scheme of amalgamation of highland distilleries ltd. (transferor company) with shaw wallace distilleries ltd. (transferee company).3. that shri o.k. meena, practising company secretary, produced books of accounts and statutory records before the official liquidator for scrutiny on 20.12.2005 ..... as required under section 394 of the companies act, 1956.4. that transferor-company was incorporated on 29 july 1991 and obtained certificate of .....

Rajansh Thukral Vs. State of Punjab and Another

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... do not find any ground to interfere with the well reasoned judgment of the high court.... . the petitioner rajansh thukral was vice president and company secretary of m/s surya pharmaceuticals limited at the relevant time. mr.rajiv goel was the managing director of m/s surya pharmaceuticals limited while mr.anil ..... the business of the company besides looking after the dealings of the company with various statutory bodies constituted under the companies act and to look into ..... chaudhary being factory manager and mr.rajiv goel being the managing director of the company are persons directly responsible for the conduct of business of the company. the petitioner-rajnash thukral as per averments in the petition was company secretary of m/s surya pharmaceuticals limited and was a person who directly deals with .....