Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: company secretaries act 1980 section 21a board of discipline Court: andhra pradesh

Sri Ramdas Motor Transport Ltd. and ors. Vs. Karedla Suryanarayana and ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : [2002]110CompCas193(AP)

..... required in addition to own vehicles without producing the original records and also without reference to the letter of the company secretary dated march 5, 1999, that the contracts register to be maintained statutorily under section 301 of the act for the years 1989 to 1992-93 are not traceable. here we should keep in mind that the ..... that occurred in the financial year 1994-95 not there in those years and where have the other engine parts gone i understand in 1980 the company was following the calendar year but the company seemed to have opted financial year for accounts purpose subsequently.258. if the statement of the respondent counsel that the production of piston ..... reversed or modified. it could have easily considered the documents and affidavits and decided about the prima facie case on the material available. in matters involving agreements of 1980 (and 1996) on the one hand and an agreement of 1991 on the other, as in this case, such remand orders would lead to further delay and .....

Smt. Dr. Renuka Datla and Oth Vs. Biological E Limited and Oth

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... were produced as evident from para 13(i) of the form annexed to be submitted by the company secretary under the companies (compliance certificate) rules 2001. mr. p.s. raman made the following submissions: (i) that for maintenance of an appeal under section 10-f of the act, a question of law must arise and that no such question of law has been raised ..... facts of the present case attract the prohibition recognized by the author under section 300 of the act. besides questioning transfer of shares as being contrary to article 66 of the articles of association, appellant no.1 has raised the plea that the company secretary has not ensured that original share certificates were not produced by respondent no.2 as envisaged under article .....

P. Bharath Bhushan and anr. Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2005(3)ALD185

..... the eight tripartite agreements. those different eight recognized unions are'(1) apseb employees union, (2) telugunadu vidyuth karmika sangam, (3) a.p. state electricity board, secretariate (p&g;) service employees association, (4) a.p. state electricity board junior account officers association, (5) a.p. state electricity board account officers association, ( ..... basis is only the individual letters addressed to certain personnel whose first options were not considered. there is no press statement issued by the additional secretary/convener of high level committee inviting appeals from the employees allotted to first preference. the petitioners, therefore, cannot interpolate the news item to ..... companies act.36. it is aptly relevant to quote para 7 of the judgment of the supreme court delivered by the hon'ble justice mr. v.r. krishna iyer (as he then was) in the case of tamil nadu education department, ministerial and general subordinate services association v. state of tamil nadu, : [1980 .....

Ahmedabad Electricity Company Limited Vs. Sanghi Spinners (India) Ltd. ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2006(4)ALD749; [2007]74SCL95(AP)

..... act, demanding the payment within a period of three weeks; failing which the petitioner would initiate proceedings for winding up of the respondent-company, in reply to the said notice the respondent raised all these untenable pleas. hence, the pleas raised by the respondent are devoid of merit.20. to prove the case of the petitioner-company, the company secretary of the petitioner-company ..... under the provisions of any act. rule 21 of the companies (court) rules, 1959 provides that every petition shall be verified by an affidavit made by the petitioner or by one of the petitioners and in the case of a body corporate by a director, secretary or other principal officer thereto. ..... 98 co. cases 151 (mad-db).33. in view of the above legal position, it has to be considered whether the company secretary of the petitioner-company was authorized to file the company petition as well as to give evidence by filing the verified affidavit and also to give evidence. admittedly, no document, showing that .....

Bandela Narsaiah Vs. Election Officer, Mandal Parishad, Kothagudem, Kh ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2001(5)ALD69; 2001(4)ALT717

..... (1)(a) and observed that the parliament limited that disqualification to a person holding the office of managing agent, manager or secretary of a company and not to other employees of the company. it was further observed:this provision, thus gives two indications as to the scope of the disqualification laid down in articles ..... constitution of india. itwas observed:the bokaro steel plant under the management and control of the steel authority of india limited. this is a company incorporated under the companies act. undoubtedly, its shares are owned by the central government. the chairman and the board of directors are appointed by the president of india. ..... parliament when passing the act, did not consider it necessary to disqualify every person holding an office of profit under a government company, but limited the disqualification to persons holding the office of managing agent, manager or secretary of the company. the fact that the entire share capital in the company in the case before us .....

Pl Shipping and Logistics Private Limited Vs. A.G.A. Publication Ltd.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... ; the petitioner has an alternative remedy of filing a civil suit without exhausting which he cannot invoke the jurisdiction of this court under section 433 (e) of the companies act; the respondent has not admitted its debt; the petitioner has not pleaded that the debts of other creditors have not been paid, and that the respondent is commercially ..... modes of performance are impliedly and necessarily forbidden. (krishna chandra sahoo v. bank of india air 2009 orissa 35; state of bihar v. j. a.c. saldanna air 1980 sc 326; haresh dayaram thakur v. state of maharastra (2000) 6 scc 179; air 2000 sc 2281; prabha shankar dubey v. state of madhya pradesh air 2004 sc ..... the corporation had ratified the act of signing of the pleading by its officer. (united bank of india v. naresh kumar (1996) 6 scc 660). 17. in view of the requirement of rule 21 of the companies (court) rules, 1959 if the person, who filed the company petition, is neither a director nor the secretary or the principal officer of .....

Union of India, New Delhi,reptd by Its a Vs. Tech Mahindra Limited,mum ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... indicate that the ministry of corporate affairs of the union of india, the cbi and the sfio itself had no reason to suspect the involvement of sr.g.jayaraman, company secretary in any of the offences in which the chairman and managing director and other directors of satyam computer services limited are said to be involved in. while it may not ..... even in the event of conviction by the criminal court, the disqualification envisaged by section 274(1)(d) and schedule xiii of the act may not apply to the respondent nos.1 and 4 who are the company and its secretary only. with regard to accused no.6, if his guilt is proved, the jurisdictional court may direct him to refund the alleged ..... excess remuneration. in c.c.no.400 of 2009, the accused are liable to be sentenced to pay fine under section 629-a of the act, if the alleged offence is .....

Rci Power Limited Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : AIR2004AP60; 2003(3)ALD762

..... , dated 22nd october, 1991 the ministry of power and non-conventional energy sources department of power constituted investment promotion cell headed by cabinet secretary and secretaries of the departments whose involvement is there in granting licence and financial assistance etc. under clause-9 of the said resolution, the board ..... down if found to be intrinsically arbitrary or based on an irrational classification or otherwise repugnant to constitutional principles.109. in singh (pargan) v. secretary of state for the home department, 1992 (1) wlr 1052, the house of lords while considering whether regulation 3(4) of the immigration appeals ..... - one for generation and the other for transmission and distribution of electricity were incorporated by the state government under companies act, 1956 apart from constituting subsidiary transmission and supply companies or corporations. initially, these corporations have to function as wholly owned subsidiaries of the state government but in due .....

Kommuru Krishnamurthy Vs. the State of Andhra Pradesh

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1961AP283

..... the crown. on the transfer of government from the east india company to the crown in 1858, came the government of india act (acts 21! and 22 vict. c. 106). that statute declares for the first time in its section 65 the lights and liabilities of the secretary of state for india to sue or be sued. section 65 ..... state in council for that of the said company.67. all treaties made by the said company shall bo binding on her majesty, and all contracts, covenants, liabilities, and engagements of the said company made, incurred, or entered into before the commencement of this act may be enforced by and against the secretary of state in council in like manner ..... and in the same courts as they might have been by and against the said company if this act had not been passed.' this would show that .....

P. Vaman Rao Vs. Secretary to Government and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : [1998]93CompCas486(AP)

..... , as already seen, there was no lock-out. even assuming without deciding, that the company has violated section 233b of the act for this year, the petitioner cannot be said to be guilty, as he has admittedly resigned as company secretary with effect from february 16, 1994, and he was not company secretary during this. period, i.e., commencing from april 1, 1994. 7. thus, the ..... .1. the petitioner, a former company secretary of sirsilk limited (hereinafter referred to as 'the company'), in which the government of andhra pradesh is the major shareholder, filed this petition under section 633(2) of the companies act, 1956 (for short 'the act'), for relieving him from the default, if any, in not complying with section 233b of the act. the company petition was admitted on march 13 .....