Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: company secretaries act 1980 chapter viii appeals Court: kolkata Page 48 of about 579 results (0.090 seconds)

Rogers Pratt Shellac Company Vs. Secretary of State

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1925Cal34

..... or accrue in british india.26. there are several matters however which have to be considered and which have been urged on behalf of the company. the first is the position of section 33 in the act. as stated above it comes under chap. iv headed 'liability in special cases.' it is to be observed that sections 31 and 32 dealing ..... accrue or arise or to be received in british india is taxable income.9. now it is admitted that no part of the company's income accrued, arose or was received in british india, section 33 (1) of the act, however, provides that ' in the case of any person residing out of british india all profits or gains accruing or arising to ..... this no doubt would extend far beyond what is recognized in england or had been recognized in british india previous to act vii of 1918, as the territorial limit of taxation of income derived from business.12. on behalf of the company, we have been referred to certain english cases, and a case in the madras high court: the board of revenue .....

Shew Kumar Nopany Vs. Grindlays Bank Limited

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1986Cal328

..... two directors of the company, in their capacity as guarantors.2. on an application of the plaintiff, the said decree was transmitted to ..... for the proposition that where an order is made sending a decree toanother court for execution, the said order by itself, confers jurisdiction on the transferee court which can act even without receiving a copy of the decree. (c) kusum kamini debi v. sailesh chakraborty, reported in air 1935 cal 118. this decision of a division ..... decree waspassed in suit no. 775 of 1980 in favour of the plaintiff, grindlays bank ltd. on the 2nd march, 1981 for rs. 36,02,511.67 p. with interest at the rate of 15% per annum from the 1st august, 1980 till realisation against the defendants ramacast limited, a limited company. shew prosad nopany and bimal kumar nopany, .....

Numazar Dorab Mehta and Ors. Vs. The Assam Company India Ltd.

Court : Kolkata

..... ga no.3680 of 2014 ec no.170 of 2014 in the high court at calcutta ordinary original civil jurisdiction original side numazar dorab mehta & ors.versus the assam company india ltd.before: the hon'ble justice soumen sen date : 8th october, 2015. appearance: mr.jayanta kr. mitra, sr.adv.mr.ranjan bachawat, sr.adv.mr. ..... court has been nullified by operation of provides that effect section 3 of provisions notwithstanding of the the anything decree or order of court. thika thika tenancy act. tenancy inconsistent act section shall therewith 3 have in any a decree passed without jurisdiction by a civil court is nullified by section 3. the vesting of thika land ..... the metropolitan city of calcutta under a lease dated 17th of april, 1984 with effect from 1st february, 1980 for a period of 21 years.the plaintiffs instituted a suit for recovery of possession after serving property act. that were a notice under section 106 of the transfer of the defendants have taken all possible objections available .....

Shri Sunirmal Chatterjee Vs. the Hon'ble High Court at Calcutta and Or ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : (2004)2CALLT240(HC)

..... further renewal shall be considered if the posts are not filled during 2002-03. this letter was issued on 26.7.2002. thereafter another reminder was given by the secretary (law) to the registrar of the circuit bench in november 2002 in order to take expeditious steps to fill up the vacant posts (d) the high court ..... justice about the need and necessity of making relaxation. the power of relaxation is not an unfettered one.42. in amrik singh v. union of india, reported in : [1980]3scr485 , the learned judges constructing the ambit of power of relaxation, made it clear that such relaxation shall be given by the authority concerned 'not subjectively but objectively' ( ..... be open to the courts to adopt any other hypothetical construction on the ground that such construction is more consistent with the alleged object and policy of the act.'24. the reference in rule 4 of the circuit bench rules to the said rules and its application mutate mutandis to the circuit bench rules also does not .....

Royal Nepal Airline Corporation and anr. Vs. Monorama Meher Singh Legh ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1966Cal319,69CWN767

..... ) 1 ch. 139 a misfeasance summons issued by the liquidator of a company against several of its directors including a second secretary of the peruvian legation diplomatic privilege was claimed in the proceeding by the said secretary. the liquidator while admitting that the secretary was entitled to the diplomatic privilege contended that he had waived it by ..... at premises no. 42 chowringhee road or any other place in calcutta either within the jurisdiction of this court or otherwise and the company known as jamair co. (private) ltd. acts as an agent of the defendant in calcutta for the limited purpose of handling ground services and general sales as mentioned in the ..... the question of immunity. moreover, there is nothing to show that the administrative officer divakara bickrarn rana of the administrator of the defendant corporation was acting with the knowledge and authority of his majesty the king of nepal or the ministry of transport and communication of the government of nepal in giving .....

Lgw Ltd. and anr. Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR2009Cal16

..... plot measuring 6 to 8 cottahs in salt lake city for allotment to l.g.w. limited for construction of company's own composite centre and send a report regarding availability of the land. yours faithfully,sd/-deputy secretary to thegovernment of west bengal.3. the special engineer by the memo dated 19th november, 1997 informed the principal ..... page 1156 and paragraph 12 at page 1152)3) : [1987]2scr223 (shri sachidanand pandey and anr. v. the state of west bengal) (paragraph 39 at page 1133).4) : [1980]3scr1338 (kasturi lal lakshmi reddy v. the state of jammu & kashmir) (paragraph 15 at page 2001)5) : [1986]2scr17 (the comptroller and auditor general of india, gian prakash ..... dealing with the public, whether by way of giving jobs or entering into contracts or issuing quotas or licences or granting other forms of largess, the government cannot act arbitrarily at its sweet will and like a private individual, deal with any person it pleases, but its action must be in conformity with standard or norm .....

Sm. Jarimon Khatoon (Chowdhurani) W/O Fateali Chowdhury Vs. Secretary ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1940Cal451

..... rs. 2175 was the fee payable on the plaint but inasmuch as rs. 195 had already been paid, he demanded from the plaintiff the difference, viz., rs. 1980. ha gave the plaintiff time to pay the said deficit amount by 6th february following. on 6th february however the plaintiff put in an application for amendment of the plaint ..... contended that if article 5, schedule 2 was not applicable, the computation must be made in accordance with the terms of clause (xi) of section 7, court-fees act. these two points raised by the plaintiff were overruled by the learned subordinate judge. he came to the conclusion that the case fell within section 7, sub-section (iv ..... be found due and proceeded to determine the amount payable. for the purpose of determining the amount payable, he started an enquiry under section 8-c, court-fees act. a commissioner was appointed for the purpose of finding out certain details which would, according to the learned subordinate judge, be relevant to find out the value of .....

Union of India (Uoi) and anr. Vs. Tata Iron and Steel Co. Ltd. and ors ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1999Cal56

..... letter dated 19th may, 1994 stated that it had been advised to adjust the excess iprs payment of rs. 10,37,96,604/-made to tisco against the company's pending iprs claims and recover the balance amount from the writ petitioner. the writ petitioner protested there to and various correspondences appeared to have been passed between ..... viable without the benefits under the scheme.3. the eepc did not find any fault with out claims all these years, evidently because you were satisfied that our company had not violated or circumvented any of the provisions of the iprs.4. as mentioned earlier, the scheme in universally applicable to all exporters and to any ..... held that the transferee cannot suffer for the fault of his predecessor.56. in n. chellappan v. secretary, kerala state electricity board reported in : [1975]2scr811 , the supreme court was dealing with a case under section 30 of the arbitration act, 1940. the said decision, therefore, has no application in the instant case.57. in prasun roy .....

Tara Properties Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Allied Resins and Chemicals Ltd.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1989Cal192

..... suth wr 364). this definition has been generally accepted in a number of decisions of various high courts. in the case of secretary of state v. mansey reported in air 1930 bom 262, it was held that the finding on a preliminary issue which does ..... supreme court. she further relied upon a decision reported in : [1975]1scr550 (shanti kumar r. canji v. the home insurance company of new york) where the supreme court expressly held that an order allowing or disallowing the amendment is appealable if it is ..... in violation of the terms of lease and also defaulted in payment of rents and service charges for the month of june 1980, oct. 1980 and from jan 1981 onwards. the plaintiff by its advocate's letter dt. 21st april, 1981 determined the lease and ..... suit for the eviction of a tenant on the ground of default in the payment of rent under west bengal premises tenancy act, 1956 and it was alleged that during the pendency of the suit the tenant defendant had made certain unauthorised constructions in .....

The Asiatic Oxygen and Acetylene Company and ors. Vs. the State and or ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : 1976CriLJ1596

..... and duties of carrying on the whole of its business subject, however, to restrictions imposed by the articles and statutory provisions. definition of manager in the companies act in sec 2(24) would include a director. therefore, it is a question of evidence. the complaint makes out an offence. evidence would only disclose who ..... the complaint, as has already been noted is not required to disclose all of them. moreover even if the board of directors collectively would act on behalf of the company circumstances may make the directors as agents. reference may be made to halsbury, 4th edition, volume 7 for treating the position of directors. in ..... act may be addressed in the case of a local authority or company to the principal officer thereof. section 2(35) which states what a principal officer means runs as follows:'principal officer', used with reference to a local authority or a company or any other public body or any association of persons or any body of individuals, means-(a) the secretary .....