Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: company secretaries act 1980 chapter viii appeals Court: kolkata Page 47 of about 579 results (0.371 seconds)

Dec 22 2010 (HC)

Elias Meyer Free School and Talmud Torah and anr. Vs. the Official Tru ...

Court : Kolkata

..... him to any person if so directed by the court. the first petitioner claims to be a beneficiary under two trusts of 1912 and 1930. the second petitioner is the secretary of the first petitioner school. the official trustee is the sole trustee of the trust.2. by a deed of conveyance executed in 1938 the official trustee, as the ..... complaints in the petition as to the inaction on the part of the official trustee. the petitioners instituted proceedings under section 446 of the companies act, 1956 to seek setting aside of an order passed by the company court directing execution of the conveyance relating to the 40-bigha plot in favour of a nominee of one ratnagiri engineering pvt. ltd which ..... part of the land or building thereat would be sub-let to any person. the petitioners claim that the 36 bigha 14 cottah plot was let out to the company for the company to use the same as a passage to the rear portion which was covered by the 50-year lease. the petitioners say that the smaller plot was let .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 23 1909 (PC)

Barindra Kumar Ghose and ors. Vs. Emperor

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : (1910)ILR37Cal467

..... 196 of the criminal procedure code, and an earlier decision of a bench of this court furnishes an answer to the objection to the sufficiency of the signature of the chief secretary on the document containing the authority: apurba krishna bose v. emperor (1907) i.l.r. 35 calc. 141.41. though it was at the outset ..... javecharam (1894) i.l.r. 19 bom. 363 the following were the facts. javecharam, a ticket-collector on the railway, was accused of having sold the railway company's tickets and misappropriated the proceeds, and one ahmed was tried with him for having dishonestly received the 'stolen property,' namely, some of the tickets, which he also ..... of these sections 25, 26, and 27 practically reproduce sections 148, 149 and 150 of the criminal procedure code of 1861. as these provisions were incorporated in the evidence act, which received the governor-general's assent on the 15th of march 1872; they naturally did not find a place in the criminal procedure code of 1872, which received the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 23 1909 (PC)

Barihdra Kumar Ghose and ors. Vs. Emperor

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : 7Ind.Cas.359

..... section 196 of the criminal procedure code, and an earlier decision of a bench of this court furnishes an answer to the objection to the sufficiency of the signature of the chief secretary on the document containing the authority: apurba krishna bose v. emperor 35 c. 141 : 7 c.l.j. 49 : 7 cr.l.j. 10 : 2 m.l ..... 103. in queen-empress v. javecharam 19 b. 363 the following were the facts. javecharam, a ticket-collector on the railway, was accused of having sold the railway company's tickets and mis-appropriated the proceeds, and one ahmed was tried with him for having dishonestly received the stolen property, namely, some of the tickets, which he ..... law or constitution whereon allegiance depends.... there striation...is certainly couched in language to the last degree vague and obscure. possibly a search into the discussions which preceded the act might suggest a meaning ; but i think that is a dangerous method of interpretation, and i would rather not resort to it. i think this objection is .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 25 2011 (HC)

Asraf Ali. Vs. the State of West Bengal and ors.

Court : Kolkata Appellate

..... suspension order dated 21.1.2004. the case made out in the writ petition is that the petitioner is an approved assistant teacher of ararbegia primary school, district nadia since 1980. a criminal case under kaliganj police station being kaliganj p.s case no. 115/2003 was initiated on 19.7.2003 and the petitioner was taken into custody on 20 ..... on bail on 16.10.2003. the said police case was initiated under 364, 302/34 of the indian penal code and also under section 25/27 of the arms act. the suspension order was passed on 21.1.2004 with a clear stipulation to have its effect retrospectively from 20.7.2003. the petitioner was found guilty in the said .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 24 1915 (PC)

Mathura Mohan Saha and ors. Vs. Ramkumar Saha and Chittagong District ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : 35Ind.Cas.305

..... the authority of the district board as a corporate body under any circumstances; such contract is not affected by the class of decisions, whereof ashbury railway carriage and iron company v. riche (32) may be taken as the type. we hold accordingly that there was an enforceable contract on the 6th september 1898.8. two questions next ..... that he has, in the interval, responded promptly to every demand of the district board.16. the result of our decision may now be summarised. appeals nos. 1979, 1980 and 1981 of 1912 are dismissed with costs. appeal no. 1243 is dismissed, but the cross-objections therein are allowed and the decree of the district judge discharged. in ..... 36 w.r. 438 : 52 j.p. 119. these cases show that when a public body or a company is established by statute or incorporated for special purposes only, and is altogether the creature of statute law, the prescriptions for its acts and contracts are imp rative and essential to their validity. the case of frend v. bennett (1858) 4 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 30 1913 (PC)

Legal Remembrancer Vs. Matilal Ghose and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : (1914)ILR41Cal173

..... of record, a characteristic which is a qualification to the exercise of any power to commit. the sudder dewani adawlut became a court of record by the east india company act of 1780 (2, george iii, c. 70), but it was not till 1793 that the new sudder courts were connected by the judges of one being the same ..... of government in 1845, the office was revived and has since then been continued. it has also been stated that the legal remembrancer is, by executive order, judicial secretary to the government and ex-officio public prosecutor for the presidency of bengal. this is obviously immaterial for our present purposes. leave was explicitly granted to the advocate- ..... served again: see also buist v. bridge (1880) 43 l.t. 432. since leave to amend was granted, a certificate has been produced from the chief secretary to the government of bengal to the effect that the application had been authorised by his excellency the governor of bengal in council and the petition will be amended accordingly .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 08 1921 (PC)

Jogendra Nath Saha Chaudhury and ors. Vs. Mahraja Jagadindra Nath Roy ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1921Cal577,67Ind.Cas.170

..... possession must consequently be investigated on this basis. in this connection, it is important to bear in mind the decision of the judicial committee in secretary of state for india v. krishnamoni gupta 29 c. 518, 29 i.a. 104 : 6 c.w.n. 617: 4 bom l. ..... .s.) 470 decided by a full bench of this court in 1881. lord davey relied upon the earlier decision of the judicial committee in trustees & agency company v. short 1888 13 app cas. 793 : 58 l.j.p.c. 4 : 59 l.t. 677 : 37 w.r. 433 : 53 ..... to be correct until proved by evidence to be incorrect under sub-section (3) of section 103 b of the bengal tenancy act. but for this circumstance, it could not be presumed that because the defendants hold a patni taluk under the plaintiff, a particular ..... shifting river should be accepted as the boundary for the purpose of determining the jurisdiction of a court; under the bengal civil courts act, 1887, the objection taken by the defendants is futile. their contention is that the old main stream of the river to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 18 1923 (PC)

Nanda Lal Agrani Vs. Jogendra Chandra Datta

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : 82Ind.Cas.297

..... there is equally nothing in the amending statute to indicate that the legislators of 1922 realised and provided for this case. section 17 of act iv of 1922 b.c. which was interpreted in thaddeus nahapie v. secretary of state for india in council 81 ind. cas. 751 : 39 c.l.j. 209 clearly does not advance the contention of the ..... centered round the question, what is the point of time to which the expression leviable has reference.5. the assistant government pleader has invited us, on behalf of the secretary of state for india in council, to read into the third column of articles 4 and 5 the following expression: 'if the plaint or memorandum of appeal were presented ..... of evasion, a fiscal statute must be strictly construed, and liability or additional liability cannot be imposed on the, subject except by clear and unambiguous terms. see stockton & darlington, railway company v. barret (1844) 11 cl. & f.590 at p. 602 : 8 soott. n.r.641 : 8 e.r. 1225 : 7 man. &g.; 870 : 65 r.r. 261, partington v .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 27 1916 (PC)

Budhu Lal Vs. Chattu Gope

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : 39Ind.Cas.465

..... ; 4 n.r. 29 ; 12 w.r. 641 ; 138 r.r. 382 ; 11 e.r 1200 and by this court in secretary of state v. british india steam navigation company 9 ind. cas. 183 ; 15 c.w. 848 ; 13 c.l.j. 90 at p. 93, what is technically called revision ..... to be re-heard, the question must arise, whether the court is competent to hold an enquiry into the facts, and for this purpose to act on evidence adduced before it or before the subordinate court under its direction. the cases of rama iyer v. venkatachala padayachi 30 m 311 ; ..... 56 l.j.q.b. 315 ; 57 l.t. 643 : 35 w.r. 511 ; 51 j.p. 549, in the case of an act which creates a new jurisdiction, a new procedure, new forms or new remedies, the procedure, forms and remedies there prescribed and no others must be followed.' ..... nature, to allow the applicant, who is really the c.i.d., to shift his ground again even if we had power to act under section 115 of the civil procedure code.7. the ordinary rule of this court is that it will not interfere and exsrcise its powers under .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 24 1869 (PC)

In Re: William Tayler

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : 44Ind.Cas.930

..... remains to be seen whether, in con-sequence) of his high position, he will be exempt from responsibility by government. there was a charge sufficiently grave to justify the secretary of state in calling for explanation. was the learned judge to wait, or immediately to vindicate his honour and his character?51. the letter proceeds:the facts of the case ..... up to the monday to leave for england in the steamer which was to sail on tuesday, and that on that day he was allowed by the peninsular and oriental company to postpone his passage until the next steamer. the letter of monday, the 12th, could not have been sent to the editor of the englishman later than saturday or ..... court. you say the words had reference to something gone by long ago. bat the letter, on the face of it, could not have referred to those bygone acts, as those acts had, and could have, no connection with the charge against a judge of the high court. besides those transactions occurred many years ago and in the paragraph to .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //