Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: company secretaries act 1980 chapter viii appeals Court: kolkata Page 1 of about 579 results (0.329 seconds)

Jun 25 1975 (HC)

Hasimara Industries Ltd. and anr. Vs. the Company Law Board and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : 1976CriLJ50

..... penal code.3. on april 2. 1971. the undersecretary to the government of india, department of company affairs. acting under the direction of the secretary, sent a complaint to the director, central bureau of investigation and inspector-general of police, delhi special police establishment, new delhi, regarding the commission of the aforesaid ..... of this inspection, according to the respondents, it appeared from the books of account that the directors and persons carrying on or conducting the business of the bajoria group of companies, acting in conspiracy with each other, had committed various illegalities which amounted to cognizable offences punishable under sections 406/ 409/420/468/477-a and section 120-b of the indian .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 11 1958 (HC)

Aluminium Corporation of India Ltd. Vs. Coal Board

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1959Cal222

..... placed the matter in the hands of its solicitors messrs khaitan and company. they, on 6-4-1955, wrote to the deputy secretary to say that the so-called excise duties purportedly imposed by the coal mines (conservation and safety) act, were not excise duties at all and, therefore, the imposition of them was beyond the ..... to collect and pay the duty on coal so despatched from its colliery. that letter was followed by another dated 19-1-1955, by which the same deputy secretary told the appellant that collections of the duty for the month of october and subsequent months should be deposited immediately. instead of complying with the direction, the appellant ..... into the government treasury every month and that there shall be a final assessment by the chairman of the coal board.9. on 4-11-1954 the deputy secretary of the coal board wrote to the appellant to say that under the coal mines conservation and safety rules, the duty of excise was also to be collected .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 27 1989 (HC)

Ajit Kumar Doshi Vs. Institute of Company Secretaries of India and ors ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : (1990)2CALLT114(HC)

..... 's application for enrolment as an associate member was rejected.3. the company secretaries act, 1980 came into force on and from january, 1981. by the said act the institute of company secretaries of india which was incorporated under the companies act, 1956 stood dissolved. it is further claimed by the petitioner that none the less the company secretaries (qualification) rules, 1975 dated 7th march, 1975 and a notification dated 15th ..... also claimed by the petitioner that the petitioner's application was pending when the said company secretaries act, 1980 came into force in january, 1981. therefore, under section 32(4) of the said company secretaries act, 1980 (hereinafter referred to as the said act) which, inter alia, provides that if, on the commencement of this act, any suit, appeal or other legal proceedings of whatever nature by or against the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 18 1986 (HC)

Kalyan Kumar Mukherjee Vs. Institute of Company Secretaries of India a ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : [1987]42CompCas466(Cal)

..... stood rejected.17. immediately thereafter on september 29, 1980, the petitioner moved this application under article 226 of the constitution challenging the said decision of the institute. during the pendency of this writ application, on january 1, 1981, the company secretaries act came into force. by the said act, the company which has known as the institute of company secretaries of india was dissolved and a body corporate ..... also known as the institute of company secretaries of india has been constituted. the new body corporate is the successor-in-interest of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 23 2009 (HC)

Promising Exports Limited and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : 2009(168)LC253(Calcutta),2009(243)ELT3(Cal)

..... is fully competent to reject the appeal. see, in this connection, the observations of this court in respect of section 129 prior to substitution of chapter xv by the finance act, 1980 in navin chandra chhotelal v. central board of excise & customs and ors. : 1981 e.l.t. 679 (s.c.) : 1971 3 scr 357. the proviso, however, gives power ..... with the due course of justice. in this regard it is appropriate to refer to the judgment passed by this court in dr. haripada poddar v. s.r. das, secretary to the government of west bengal reported in 1970 lab.i.c. 930, relied on behalf of the petitioner, wherein while dissenting from the judgment passed by the allahabad ..... show cause notice dated 29th december, 2006 and the adjudication order dated 30th november, 2007 it was also argued that the notice to show cause was issued on the company and not on the petitioner in his individual capacity and the appellate tribunal without going into the said question whether a show cause notice was issued on the writ .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 05 1986 (HC)

Gonterman Peipers (India) Limited Vs. Additional Secretary to the Gove ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : 1987(13)ECC33,1991LC286(Calcutta),1986(26)ELT471(Cal)

..... before the revisional authority for arriving at the satisfaction as enjoined by section 36(2). the affidavit in opposition has not been affirmed by the additional secretary, the respondent no. 1 who issued the impugned notice. it is affirmed by the respondent no. 4, the assistant collector of central excise on ..... considering the extended definition of manufacture as given in section 2(f)(v) of the said act by the central excises & salt and additional duties of excise (amendment) act, 1980. the effect of various amendments inserted by the amendment act was to include the processes of bleaching, dyeing and printing etc. within the definition of the ..... , those rolls cannot be considered as identifiable machine parts.36. it is very significant that the customs department contended before the tribunal in tata engineering locomotive company limited v. collector of customs reported in 1983 e.l.t. 1122 that the processes such as annealing, straightening, buffing, rough machining, surface protection .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 16 1970 (HC)

State of West Bengal, Through Addl. Secy. Dept. of Excise and ors. Vs. ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1970Cal548

..... and then to deal with the joint application for renewal according to law.2. there was dispute among the directors of the company and there were certain proceedings under the companies act, 1956. the company was separately represented in respect of two contending groups before the learned trial judge and they have been so represented before this ..... is annexure 'i' and appearing at page 1 of the supplementary paper book, and which is dated 30th march, 1966, written by the assistant secretary, excise department, government of west bengal, to the excise commissioner by whichthe government expressed its approval for the grant of the brewery licence in respect of ..... contentions in support of this appeal were urged by mr. p. k. sen gupta, learned advocate for the appellant. mr. somnath chatterjee, learned advocate for the company represented by mr. a. k. thakur, contended that the appeal has become infructuous inasmuch as the period for which the application for renewal had been made has elapsed .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 15 2008 (HC)

The Municipal Commissioner, the K.M.C. and ors. Vs. Kedar Nath Bansal ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : (2008)IVCALLT275(HC)

..... 0.90 m. according to the pvt. respondents/complainant/other set of flat owners all these constructions not only infringes the bldg. rules of the cmc act, 1980 and deviated the bldg. sanction plan but also it causes inconvenience/suffering to them and to the others dwellers of the building. more so the alleged ..... irrelevant consideration, mistakes, misunderstanding', which could be classified further as self-misdirection or addressing oneself to the wrong question. as per judgment passed in r. v. secretary of state for the home department, ex parte daly reported in (2001) 3 all. e.r. 433 disproportionate decision in the angle of unreasonableness and proportionality tools ..... by this court. on bare perusal of the deed of conveyance executed on 3rd august, 1999 by m/s. mahadeo nirman private limited, a private limited company incorporated under the companies act, 1956 as owner/vendor in favour of sri sanjeev kr. bansal, writ petitioner no. 5, purchaser, registered on 3rd august, 1999, it appears .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 28 2007 (HC)

Kolkata Municipal Corporation and ors. Vs. Bengal Club Limited and anr ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : 2008(1)CHN639

..... judge of this court who has allowed prayer of the respondent club declaring that the surcharge on consolidated rate under section 171(4) of the kolkata municipal corporation act, 1980 is not leviable and/or recoverable from the petitioner club in respect of the premises no. 33b, chowringhee road, kolkata (hereinafter referred to as the said premises ..... ). the case in the writ petition is that the respondent club is the owner of the said premises. the club is a limited company and all the members thereof are using the same for residential purposes. though the club is a corporate body the members thereof are contributing to the coffer of ..... exceeds eighteen thousand rupees, forty per cent, of the annual value.(3) in calculating the gross amount of property tax including tax under the howrah bridge act, 1926 (ben. act iv of 1926) that may be imposed on lands and buildings (including huts) per quarter and the net amount payable per quarter after allowing rebate under sub .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 01 2009 (HC)

Hindusthan National Glass and Industries Limited and anr. Vs. Reserve ...

Court : Kolkata

..... . 32502, 36764, 36782, 37150, 37197 and 37739/2003 and 1421, 8809 and 11180/2004 (v. kannappan and 19 ors. v. additional secretary, ministry of finance and company affairs,) delivered on november 26, 2008 where employees of bank of madura were allowed to maintain a petition under article 226 of the constitution against ..... a large extent would depend upon the dealings of the stock exchange. 32. the concept that all public sector undertakings incorporated under the indian companies act or societies registration act for being state must be financed by the central government and under the deep and pervasive control thereof has undergone a sea change. the ..... 4 mlj 385 (nadar mahajana sangam v. reserve bank of india). a society instituted a writ petition complaining primarily against a scheduled bank incorporated under the companies act. the society alleged that its members were beneficially interested in certain shares of the bank which the bank and its directors had attempted to transfer to .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //