Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: company secretaries act 1980 chapter vii penalties Court: mumbai Page 55 of about 548 results (0.132 seconds)

Sep 28 2015 (HC)

Tardeo Properties Private Ltd. and Others Vs. State of Maharashtra and ...

Court : Mumbai

..... in order to perfect their title over the property. they did not hear anything from their advocates either. however, when the parliament enacted the companies act, 2013 amending the original act of 1956 that the petitioners thought of seeking legal advice particularly in relation to certain obligations which are required to be complied with in terms ..... judge to return back the award to enable them to present the same before the sub registrar of registration. an order came to be passed in january,1980 on the said application whereby the learned sub-judge ordered return of the award to the arbitrators to enable them to present it for registration. this ..... 2nd respondent is exercising powers and discharging the obligations and functions under the registration act including registration of documents presented. 6. there is a certain claim raised by the petitioners on the basis of an agreement for sale dated 10th april, 1980. from paragraph 4, together with its subclauses, it is stated that on the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 31 1991 (TRI)

Air India Vs. Addl. Collector of Customs (P)

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in : (1993)(67)ELT400Tri(Mum.)bai

..... improved upon the system to ensure against such unauthorised loading of cargo, but from the affidavit purported to have been signed by one shri jyotirvadan jugatrai rindani, secretary and deputy director administration of air india, we find that it is only in the nature of an explanation in the present case and does not throw ..... by air india flight 102 dated 3-12-1986 were examined in the presence of panchas. on examination, it was found that they bore the markings as "geeta marble company, 7580 pearey lal bhavan, ram nagar, n. delhi". they were also bearing an air india sticker bearing airway bill no. 098-49692845 montreal lot of 5 packages ..... of transporting unmanifested cargo, containing narcotics, and non-compliance of the statutory requirements, and if penal consequences vide section 114 cannot be attributed, section 117 of the act, even though not specifically mentioned in the show cause notice, can be invoked. there is no legal bar against the same.10. penalty that could be imposed .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 09 1987 (TRI)

Swastik Household and Industrial Vs. Income-tax Officer

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Reported in : (1988)25ITD479(Mum.)

..... was one where all assets (movable and immovable) and all liabilities forming the undertaking of the old banks stood transferred to the new banks under the banking companies (acquisition and transfer of undertaking) act, 1970, with effect from the appointed date ; and hence that circular [directing that no profit under section 41(2) shall be taxed] was not ..... messrs ofisade private limited will be issued.the assessee then wrote to midc on 9-6-1979 asking for a review of midc's decision. on 28-1-1980 midc declined to review its decision and insisted on the payment of about rs. 42 lakhs by way of additional premium so that it could issue an order ..... application of section 41(2) does not arise. he placed reliance on the following decisions : (iii) sarabhai m. chemicals (p.) lid. v. p.n. mittal, competent authority [1980] 126 itr 1 (guj.), and shri palkhivala also submitted that a similar issue has been considered by the tribunal (ahmedabad bench 'a') in the case of shahibag entrepreneurs (p.) ltd .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 18 1997 (TRI)

Haldor Topsoe Vs. Deputy Commissioner of

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Reported in : (1998)66ITD420(Mum.)

..... cross appeals relate to the amounts received by the assessee under two separate agreements entered into with rashtriya chemicals & fertilizers ltd. ("rcf"), a public sector company registered under the indian companies act, 1956. the first agreement is dated 15-2-1981 and the second is dated 19-7-1982. the first relates to the construction and erection of ..... he relied upon the decision of the tribunal in the case of ito v.rheinbraun consulting gmbh[it appeal no. 1145 (bom.) of 1985] for the assessment year 1980-81 and swedish telecomes international ab v.asstt. cit [it appeal no. 7506 (bom.) of 1991] for the assessment year 1988-89 which lay down that the ..... cases it does so lie. that does not mean that the consultant cannot provide management services for the owner. the definition of manager and management given in the companies act in section 2 are also not, to our mind, conclusive of the matter.27. the learned counsel for the assessee has referred to certain definitions of the word .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 27 2016 (HC)

Gajanan Dahotre Vs. Bank of India and Others

Court : Mumbai

..... 1996 in erstwhile bank is also relevant factor, which was overlooked. it is relevant to note that the regulations in question are statutory regulations made under the banking companies act. the similar regulations are applicable and/or made compulsory in all the banks. the petitioner, though has completed more than 10 years service in erstwhile bank, is ..... 1 bank. on 31.01.1995, on the petitioner s retirement, respondent no. 1 addressed a letter of appreciation. on 02.02.1995, respondent no. 3 s secretary addressed a letter of appreciation to the petitioner. hence once again it can be observed that the petitioner's rise at the 'board level posts' also remained steady and ..... as its regional manager, maharashtra region (pune). on 09.04.1979, respondent no. 1 promoted the petitioner as its assistant general manager (a.g.m). on 10.11.1980, respondent no. 1 promoted the petitioner as its deputy general manager (d.g.m). on 19.06.1984, respondent no. 1 promoted the petitioner as its general manager .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 21 2004 (TRI)

Reliance Industries Ltd. and ors. Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in : (2004)(174)ELT344Tri(Mum.)bai

..... 1938 pc 15) while considering the provisions of section 30 of the sea customs act, 1878, observing the finding of lord blandsburg in an earlier case, 'price being relieved of loading representing post ..... from your letter that the foreign vessel carrying iron ore pellets is proposed to be anchored in the waters of b.p.t. port at bfl and your company desires to unload the raw materials directly into the barges/lighter vessels and into the lorries parked on the wharf. your request has been examined by this custom ..... of the customs act. once such goods are duty paid goods being removed from the holds of the ship for home consumption, further expenses incurred to take such goods 'home' would be expenses incurred on duty paid goods and would be expenses beyond the customs area/barrier. the privy council in ford motor company v. secretary of state air .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 25 2004 (TRI)

Modern Suiting Vs. the Commissioner of Customs

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in : (2005)(179)ELT168Tri(Mum.)bai

..... order contrary to bonds instructions can not be upheld. d. the reliance of the appellant on a do letter dated 29.9.2000 of exports commissioner to the jt. secretary (drawback) in finance ministry stating that evidence of capital goods imported under epcg scheme having been used to manufacture the goods exported should not be insisted upon and declaration ..... order cannot be upheld. the duty and interest demand order is required to be set aside. g. since the appellants request for further extension of export period being bifr company is under consideration by the dgft the plea of the demands of duty being premature is to be upheld. the demands, if any will have to be worked out ..... fail to pay the amount of duty indicated above and the interest due why it should not be recovered from them along with penalties under section 142 of the customs act 1962.along with noticee, shri p.l. sarwagi vice-president of appellants co.shri agarwal & shri ravinder shah, ca were also called upon to show cause why .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 24 2004 (TRI)

Reliance Industries Ltd. and ors. Vs. Commissioners of Customs (Prev.)

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in : (2004)(95)ECC180

..... 1938 pc 15, while considering the provisions of section 30 of the sea customs act, 1.878, observing the finding of lord blandsburg in an earlier case, 'price being relieved of loading representing ..... from your letter that the foreign vessel carrying iron ore pellets is proposed to be anchored in the waters of b.p.t. port at bfl and your company desires to unload the raw materials directly into the barges/lighter vessels and into the lorries parked on the wharf. your request has been examined by this custom ..... of the customs act. once such goods are duty paid goods being removed from the holds of the ship for home consumption, further expenses incurred to take such goods 'home' would be expenses incurred on duty paid goods and would be expenses beyond the customs area/barrier. the privy council in ford motor company v. secretary of state, air .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //