Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: company secretaries act 1980 chapter vii penalties Page 1 of about 5,195 results (0.126 seconds)

Justice k.s.puttaswamy(retd) Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... there has to be a higher ranking officer along with, preferably, a judicial officer. the provisions contained in section 33(2) of the act to the extent it gives power to joint secretary is, therefore, struck down giving liberty to the respondents to suitably enact a provision on the aforesaid lines, which would adequately protect the ..... devices, information can be accessed, stored and disseminated without notice to the individual. metadata and data mining make the individual s personal information subject to private companies and the state. in this background, his lordship discusses the necessity of a data protection regime for safeguarding privacy and protecting the autonomy of the individual. ..... . scc (cri) 155]. , at paras 192, 197-b, 234 and 241 and prem shankar shukla v. delhi admn. [prem shankar shukla v. delhi admn., (1980) 3 scc526:1980. scc (cri) 815]. , at paras 21 and 22. it is too late in the day to canvas that a fundamental right must be traceable to express language in .....

Jasch Indus. Ltd. Vs. Cce

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in : (2005)(100)ECC269

..... fabric rolls was not adopted and only on average basis, the quantity of the excess stock was determined, cannot be accepted, especially when shri s.k. verma, company secretary, had never retracted his confessional statement at any stage.9. no doubt, the goods were provisionally released to the appellants, but still, the redemption fine in respect ..... premises, in my view, has been illegally set aside by the commissioner (appeals). the non-accountal of these goods was accepted by shri s.k.verma, company secretary of the appellants, in his statement recorded at the spot and in the face of his admission, the argument of the learned counsel that proper mode of measuring ..... be ignored by the adjudicating authority, rather it is clear cut case of clandestine removal of the excisable goods by the appellants and for camouflaging their illegal act, they wrongly showed the discharge of duty liability in the invoices which they handed over to the driver of the tempo at the time of transportation of .....

B.S. Yeddyurappa Vs. the Lokayukta of Karnataka and Others

Court : Karnataka

..... legal status of the special leave petition filed by m/s. v s lad and sons. with reference to the letters of the central government, the above-said companies themselves replied to the ministry of mines, government of india, clarifying that the special leave petition was pending before the supreme court and that there was no stay ..... government to grant mining lease over that area. therefore, the grant of approval of the mining plan was a matter, which was between the central government and the companies and there was no question of making favourable or unfavourable reply from the state government in this regard;(xvii) that the government of india had sent three letters to ..... under sections 7, 8, 9, 13(1)(d) r/w section 13(2) of prevention of corruption act, 1988, and investigation taken is up and there is no merit in the writ petition.11. respondent no.4/the principal secretary to governor of karnataka, has filed statement of objections contending that the petition is not maintainable as it is .....

Sabu Mathew George Vs. Union of India and Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... of, any director, manager, secretary or other officer of the company, such director, manager, secretary or other officer shall also be deemed to be guilty of that offence and shall be liable to be proceeded against and punished ..... due diligence to prevent the commission of such offence. (2) notwithstanding anything contained in sub section (1), where any offence punishable under this act has been committed by a company and it is proved that the offence has been committed with the consent or connivance of, or is attributable to any neglect on the part ..... the meetings of the advisory committees. (d) the national inspection and monitoring committee constituted by the central government for conducting periodic inspection shall continue to function till the act is effectively implemented. the reports of this committee be placed before the 2 (2001) 5 scc5773 (2003) 8 sc4094 (2003) 8 scc4105 (2003) 8 .....

Virendra Pal Singh and ors. Vs. District Assistant Registrar, Cooperat ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : (1980)4SCC109; 1980(12)LC673(SC)

..... known that many of the cooperative societies, particularly in rural areas, need the guidance of well trained expert officers and it is the function of the secretary and the other members of the centralised service to afford proper guidance to the ignorant and often illiterate members of the cooperative society. the supervisory powers ..... removal and other conditions of service of persons appointed to such posts shall be governed by the provisions of that section and the rules made thereunder. the secretary is to be the chief executive officer of that 'cooperative society', and subject to the control and supervision of the committee of management he is responsible ..... we are, therefore, unable to agree with she submission that the u.p. cooparative societies act is not a law dealing with cooperative societies because wide powers are given to the registrar of cooperative societies and the secretaries of societies and because a centralised service has been created.12. another argument which was .....

M/s Ferns Builders And Developers Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... of or is attributable to any neglect on the part of any director, manager, secretary or other officer of the company, then such 457 person would be deemed to be guilty of that offence and shall be proceeded accordingly. 27.7 section 7 of the klgp act-2011 is an exhaustive section which speaks about the constitution of special courts not only ..... .6. 1959 scr629: air1958sc731: mohd. hanif quareshi and others vs. state of bihar and others. 3817. (2012) 6 scc312: state of madhya pradesh vs. rekesh kohli and another.8. (1980) 2 scc665: v.c. shukla and others vs. state (delhi administration) and others.9. 1952 scr435: air1952sc123:1952. cri lj805: kathi raning rawat vs. state of saurashtra. 10.(1979) ..... (d.d. 29.05.1953) : k.c. gajapati narayan deo and others vs. the state of orissa. 29.w.p. nos. 1118/1979 and connected (d.d.13.11.1980) : ajay hasia and others vs. khalid mujib sehravardi and others. 30.crl.a. nos.446-449/2004 and connected matters (d.d. 08.03.2006) : zahira habibullah sheikh and .....

Vittal Shetty Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... of or is attributable to any neglect on the part of any director, manager, secretary or other officer of the company, then such 457 person would be deemed to be guilty of that offence and shall be proceeded accordingly. 27.7 section 7 of the klgp act-2011 is an exhaustive section which speaks about the constitution of special courts not only ..... .6. 1959 scr629: air1958sc731: mohd. hanif quareshi and others vs. state of bihar and others. 3817. (2012) 6 scc312: state of madhya pradesh vs. rekesh kohli and another.8. (1980) 2 scc665: v.c. shukla and others vs. state (delhi administration) and others.9. 1952 scr435: air1952sc123:1952. cri lj805: kathi raning rawat vs. state of saurashtra. 10.(1979) ..... (d.d. 29.05.1953) : k.c. gajapati narayan deo and others vs. the state of orissa. 29.w.p. nos. 1118/1979 and connected (d.d.13.11.1980) : ajay hasia and others vs. khalid mujib sehravardi and others. 30.crl.a. nos.446-449/2004 and connected matters (d.d. 08.03.2006) : zahira habibullah sheikh and .....

G Lakshmanappa Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... of or is attributable to any neglect on the part of any director, manager, secretary or other officer of the company, then such 457 person would be deemed to be guilty of that offence and shall be proceeded accordingly. 27.7 section 7 of the klgp act-2011 is an exhaustive section which speaks about the constitution of special courts not only ..... .6. 1959 scr629: air1958sc731: mohd. hanif quareshi and others vs. state of bihar and others. 3817. (2012) 6 scc312: state of madhya pradesh vs. rekesh kohli and another.8. (1980) 2 scc665: v.c. shukla and others vs. state (delhi administration) and others.9. 1952 scr435: air1952sc123:1952. cri lj805: kathi raning rawat vs. state of saurashtra. 10.(1979) ..... (d.d. 29.05.1953) : k.c. gajapati narayan deo and others vs. the state of orissa. 29.w.p. nos. 1118/1979 and connected (d.d.13.11.1980) : ajay hasia and others vs. khalid mujib sehravardi and others. 30.crl.a. nos.446-449/2004 and connected matters (d.d. 08.03.2006) : zahira habibullah sheikh and .....

Sri Erappa Shetty Vs. The Chief Secretary

Court : Karnataka

..... of or is attributable to any neglect on the part of any director, manager, secretary or other officer of the company, then such 457 person would be deemed to be guilty of that offence and shall be proceeded accordingly. 27.7 section 7 of the klgp act-2011 is an exhaustive section which speaks about the constitution of special courts not only ..... .6. 1959 scr629: air1958sc731: mohd. hanif quareshi and others vs. state of bihar and others. 3817. (2012) 6 scc312: state of madhya pradesh vs. rekesh kohli and another.8. (1980) 2 scc665: v.c. shukla and others vs. state (delhi administration) and others.9. 1952 scr435: air1952sc123:1952. cri lj805: kathi raning rawat vs. state of saurashtra. 10.(1979) ..... (d.d. 29.05.1953) : k.c. gajapati narayan deo and others vs. the state of orissa. 29.w.p. nos. 1118/1979 and connected (d.d.13.11.1980) : ajay hasia and others vs. khalid mujib sehravardi and others. 30.crl.a. nos.446-449/2004 and connected matters (d.d. 08.03.2006) : zahira habibullah sheikh and .....

Manjappagowda Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... of or is attributable to any neglect on the part of any director, manager, secretary or other officer of the company, then such 457 person would be deemed to be guilty of that offence and shall be proceeded accordingly. 27.7 section 7 of the klgp act-2011 is an exhaustive section which speaks about the constitution of special courts not only ..... .6. 1959 scr629: air1958sc731: mohd. hanif quareshi and others vs. state of bihar and others. 3817. (2012) 6 scc312: state of madhya pradesh vs. rekesh kohli and another.8. (1980) 2 scc665: v.c. shukla and others vs. state (delhi administration) and others.9. 1952 scr435: air1952sc123:1952. cri lj805: kathi raning rawat vs. state of saurashtra. 10.(1979) ..... (d.d. 29.05.1953) : k.c. gajapati narayan deo and others vs. the state of orissa. 29.w.p. nos. 1118/1979 and connected (d.d.13.11.1980) : ajay hasia and others vs. khalid mujib sehravardi and others. 30.crl.a. nos.446-449/2004 and connected matters (d.d. 08.03.2006) : zahira habibullah sheikh and .....