Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: company secretaries act 1980 chapter vii penalties Court: mumbai Page 50 of about 548 results (0.262 seconds)

Chandrabhushan Prasad Purushottam Prasad Mishra Vs. Hercules Hoists Lt ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1992)94BOMLR309

..... made by the 4th labour court, bombay, in reference (ida) no. 437 of 1983, under the provisions of the industrial disputes act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as 'the act').2. the first respondent is a company engaged in the manufacture and sale of travelling trolleys, electric hoists, cranes and other allied equipments. the first respondent has a factory at ..... and practice. it had also been noticed that the petitioner has changed his small table and taken possession of the big table kept at the place of ex-secretary shri badetia. it was alleged that, despite orally being advised against it by the commercial executive, shri m.c. bhuta, on two or three occasions between ..... section 18(1).19. finally, mr. kochar relied upon on a judgment of the supreme court in ameteep machine tools v. labour court, haryana and anr. : (1980)iillj453sc . this was a case where the employer had dismissed some of the workmen. a settlement came to be signed with individual workmen directly, under which it was agreed .....

Dr. Narote Amol Sadashivrao and Others Vs. State of Maharashtra and Ot ...

Court : Mumbai

..... the legal policy by the judicial order, and thus not sustainable. (emphasis supplied) 65] in the case of brihanmumbaimahanagar palika vs. secretary, bar council of maharashtra - 2012(6) mh.l.j. 407, a full bench of this court, in a similar context, ..... of law can only interfere if such policy contravenes statutory or constitutional provisions. 29. in the case of metropolis theatre company v. state of chicago- 57 l ed 730, the supreme court of united states observed that in matters of the ..... 33. in the case of tamil nadu education dept. ministerial and general subordinate services assn vs. state of tamil nadu (1980) 3 scc 97), the change in seniority policy was challenged as arbitrary, discriminatory and violative of a constitutional guarantee. negativing the ..... 5290 of 2013 made two submissions: a) upon coming into the force of the maharashtra university of health sciences act, 1998 (1998 act) with effect from 3.6.1998, the maharashtra university of health sciences and alone has the power to .....

Society for Clean Environment and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and or ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 1992(3)BomCR362

..... of the government of india itself about the deteriorating situation, which necessitated the incorporation of a specific and clear condition, '...the company should see that the ambient air quality conditions are not disturbed due to running of units 1, 2 and 3 and the ..... . du pond de nemours & co. v. train, 430 u.s. 112, and e.p.a. v. national crushed stone association, (1980)449 u.s. 64 . peter c. yeager through the cambridge university press publication 'the limits of law'. the public regulation of private pollution ..... and when the necessity therefore arises. we trust that in these days of global concern for environmental excellence no enlightened entrepreneur would act in a rash and reckless manner. the credentials of the tatas in devising measures of environmental improvement, in a more liberal ..... sukumaran, j.1. this is an environmental action. society for clean environment, bombay and its secretary are the petitioners. on the array of the respondents is the union of india-respondent no .....

Tukaram Kshemchandra Redkar Vs. Sanjay Shankar Mandrekar

Court : Mumbai Goa

..... the apex court held thus: 15. the bokaro steel plant is under the management and control of the steel authority of india ltd. this is a company incorporated under the companies act. undoubtedly, its shares are owned by the central government. the chairman and the board of directors are appointed by the president of india. however, the appointment ..... of the government who controlled the activities of the society; (ii) though the project officer was the appointing authority of the appellant but he was only a secretary of the society by virtue of his being an officer in the government; (iii) the government sanctioned the number of posts of teacher, fixed their scales ..... working as an assistant teacher in a basic primary school run by the uttar pradesh board of basic education act, 1972. his nomination paper was rejected by the returning officer by order dated 05/05/1980. the appellant, biharilal dobray, was declared elected. the election petition filed by the respondent before the allahabad .....

Manoj Oswal Vs. the State of Maharashtra, Through Sr.P.i and Another

Court : Mumbai

..... india v/s manubhai d. shah (1992)3 scc 637). in this context, what has been held by the honourable supreme court in the case of secretary, ministry of information and broadcasting, government of india v/s cricket association of bengal, reported in air 1995 sc 1236 and after a survey of all ..... . in encyclopaedia of information technology law, email, the internet and the law, essential knowledge for safer surfing, tim kevan and paul mcgrath, universal law publishing company, second indian reprint 2010 , with reference to decided cases by the courts in united states of america and united kingdom, the authors point out the mischief ..... prataprao govindrao pawar is chairman of m/s sakal papers private limited. this company is incorporated and registered under the indian companies act, 1956. it is engaged in the business of printing and publishing news papers in the states of maharashtra and goa. the company has also website, therefore, publications have wide circulation throughout india and abroad .....

Emperor Vs. Shreekant Pandurang Ketkar

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1943)45BOMLR323

..... by way of preventing a public danger' when the safety of the state is involved.the house of lords in that case were dealing with a regulation enabling the home secretary to arrest a man and detain him, without any trial, without any right of appeal, and without any limitation to the period of detention. as far as i can see ..... taken away by subsequent legislation. the analogy of trial of civil cases on that point does not seem to me to be quite appropriate. as held in colonial sugar refining company v. irving [1905] a.c. 369 it is quite true that the right to appeal would begin on the date of the trial of the civil suit, and to the ..... -matter also falls within items 1 and 2 of the concurrent list, but a more conclusive answer to the point seems to be section 102 of the government of india act, which provides :notwithstanding anything in the preceding sections of this chapter, the federal legislature shall, if the governor-general has in his discretion declared by proclamation that a grave .....

Adarsh Co-op. Housing Society Ltd. A Society registered under Maharash ...

Court : Mumbai

..... in ishwarlal girdharlal joshi etc. v. state of gujarat and another, this court rejected the contention that the opinion formed by the deputy secretary under section 17(1) of the land acquisition act cannot be considered as the opinion of the state government. after referring to the rules of business regulating the government business, this court ..... particular paragraphs 5 and 6 where the decisions in the cases of - (i) s. parthasarathi vs. state of andra pradesh, (1974) 3 scc 459, (ii) metropolitan properties company (f.g.c.) limited(supra) and (iii) kumaon mandal vikas nigam6 are referred. b. tata cellular(supra), and in particular paragraphs 129, 131 to 138; c. international ..... 14 of the constitution. (emphasis supplied) 368. the apex court also referred to the decision of kasturi lal lakshmi reddy vs. state of jammu and kashmir, (1980) 4 scc 1) and extracted paragraphs 14 and 15, which are to the following effect: 14. where any governmental action fails to satisfy the test of reasonableness .....

Sarku Engineering Services SDN BHD Vs. Union of India, Through the Sec ...

Court : Mumbai

..... , installation and commissioning services to the oil and gas industry. first respondent is a union of india, through the secretary, ministry of petroleum and natural gas, and exercises administrative control and supervision. second respondent is a public sector undertaking and contributes the overwhelming majority of ..... . facts relevant for deciding this writ petition can be stated as follows:- petitioner is a part of the sapura kencana group, which is a limited company and is listed on the stock exchange of malaysia. according to the petitioner, it is the world's largest integrated providers of engineering, procurement, construction ..... of power by administrative authorities. 45. this decision of the hon'ble supreme court, rendered in the context of court martial proceedings under the army act, 1950, has been consistently followed by the courts in other contexts as well and in particular in the context of orders blacklisting contractors. 46. .....

Baboobhai Patel and Company Vs. Collector of Customs

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in : (1985)(19)ELT287Tri(Mum.)bai

..... of piperazine adipate, to 214 mg of piperazine calcium edetate, to 125 mg of piperazine citrate, and to 104 mg. of piperazine phosphate." in british pharmacopoeia 1980, vol. i, page 353, piperazine hydrate is described as : piperazine hydrate contains not less than 98.0 per cent of c4h10n2, 6h2o. in u.s ..... with prescribed standards as per b.p. 1980.(with respect to content of piperazine hexahydrate)--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- "diethylene diamine hexahydrate (piperazine hexahydrate) in the ..... is to be taken as equivalent of 100.5% as per b.p. 1980 page : 5). opinion : in the opinion of the undersigned the sample referred to above is not of standard quality as defined in the act and the rules thereunder for the reasons given below. the sample does not comply .....

Smt. Maria Teresa Philomena D'Rocha Pegado Vs. State of Goa, through t ...

Court : Mumbai Goa

..... directorates of mining and geology of any state government (by whatever name called ), and the mineral exploration corporation limited, a government company within the meaning of section 617 of the companies act, 1956:] [provided also that nothing in this sub-section shall apply to any mining lease (whether called mining lease, mining concession ..... or by any other name) in force immediately before the commencement of this act in the union territory of goa, daman and diu ..... sub-section (2) thereof specifically prohibits grant of reconnaissance permit, prospecting licence or mining lease otherwise than in accordance with the provisions of the said act and the rules made thereunder. sub-section (3) thereof provides that the state government may, after prior consultation with the central government and in accordance .....