Companies Act 1956 Schedule 5 - Judgment Search Results

State Bank of Saurashtra Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Rajkot

Reported in : (1999)63TTJ(Rajkot.)691

of assessees as also to the professionals and the leasing companies which have not leased out machinery to those industrial undertakings as to the claim under s 32ab of the it act of the respective banks b a copy of letter received priority items as specified in the list in the eleventh schedule it may be clarified that the business of construction is 9th july 1986 issued by the cbdt reported in 1986 56 ctr st 1 1986 161 itr 17 st relevant portion

income Tax Officer Vs. State Bank of Saurashtra

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Rajkot

Reported in : (1998)62TTJ(Rajkot.)665

year 1985 86 in the case of ito wd 2 5 baroda v shri donald macindeor rep by bharat heavy electrical

Assistant Commissioner of Income Vs. Harsukhlal Dhirajlal Doshi

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Rajkot

Reported in : (1999)65TTJ(Rajkot.)788

the creditors viz shri rajendran under the foreign exchange regulation act was also dropped taking lenient view and a token penalty compared the cases of a small turnover of rs 1 53 370 where the gp returned was about 28 per cent

Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Joshi Formulabs (P) Ltd. (Joshi

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Rajkot

of an engineer the sister concerns are all private limited companies suffering the same rate of tax the assessee company has have been made under s 40a 2 b of the act on the ground that it is excessive and unreasonable and dozens of sharp refills with nozzles from sanghvi sharp refills 54 22 per gross but when the dy cit sr verified

Assistant Commissioner of Vs. Cham Marine Products (P.) Ltd.

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Rajkot

Reported in : (2001)77ITD13(Rajkot.)

i e i tax concessions will be available to indian companies and non corporate tax payees resident in india who have it has been held there was clear evidence that the action was initiated in pursuance of directives of the commissioner which court in the case of cit v rathinasabapathy mudaliar 1964 51 itr 204 laid down that the information need not be

Assistant Commissioner of Vs. Radhey Shyam Bansal

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Rajkot

rs 33 500 made under s 65 of the it act on account of unexplained cash credits representing unexplained loan in ramesh chawla has sent this gift to him in us 5000 because he had helped shri r chawla in his earlier

Parekh Automobiles Vs. Income Tax Officer

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Rajkot

Reported in : (2000)68TTJ(Rajkot.)722

was reopened under the provision of section 263 of the act by the commissioner while framing the fresh assessment the assessee p n balasubramaniam v income tax officer 1978 112 itr 512 ap 7 smt mahinder kaur v central government 1976 104

Assistant Commissioner of Vs. Laxmanbhai J. Patel

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Rajkot

Reported in : (2001)77ITD166(Rajkot.)

there was a search action under section 132 of the act against the assessee and his residential and business premises were of the assessee 26 regarding the amount of rs 1 50 000 mentioned against dharambhavan the assessee has explained that his

Essar Oil Ltd. Vs. Income-tax Officer

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Rajkot

Reported in : (2001)77ITD92(Rajkot.)

epl submitted a certificate under section 197 1 of the act issued by the assessing officer of epl authorising the assessee work and responsibilities time schedule standards of performance price payment schedule owners responsibilities warranties etc are different in all the three rs 1 84 41 814 to rs 78 77 973 5 during the course of hearing the learned representative of the

Assistant Commissioner of Vs. Vasantlal C. Mehta

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Rajkot

Reported in : (2001)77ITD76(Rajkot.)

the assessing officer in this case there was a search action in the business and the residential premises of the assessee in the case of mehta parikh amp co v cit 1956 30 itr 181 wherein it has been held that evidence 89 according to him the disclosure made of rs 5 58 000 during the course of search is quite nominal as