Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: coking coal mines nationalisation act 1972 section 4 acquisition of right in coking coal mines Page 20 of about 194 results (0.169 seconds)

Nivedhya Ouseppachan and Ors. Vs.medical Council of India and Ors.

Court : Delhi

..... article 19(6) as it originally stood; the subject-matter covered by the said provision being justiciable, and the amendment adds that the state monopolies or nationalisation, schemes which may be legislation, are an illustration of reasonable restrictions imposed in the interests of the general public and must be treated as such. that ..... for the purpose of making profits in order to enrich the state ex-chequer. the constitution-makers had apparently assumed that the state monopolies or schemes of nationalisation would fall under, and be protected by, article 19(6) as it originally stood; but when judicial decisions rendered the said assumption invalid, it was ..... pragmatic. the first proceeds on the general ground that all national wealth and means of producing it should come under national control, whilst the second supports nationalisation only on grounds of efficiency and increased output.14. the amendment made by the legislature in article 19(6) shows that according to the legislature, a .....

World-wide Volkwagen Corp. Vs. Woodson

Court : US Supreme Court

World-Wide Volkwagen Corp. v. Woodson - 444 U.S. 286 (1980) U.S. Supreme Court World-Wide Volkwagen Corp. v. Woodson, 444 U.S. 286 (1980) World-Wide Volkwagen Corp. v. Woodson No. 78-1078 Argued October 3, 1979 Decided January 21, 1980 444 U.S. 286 CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF OKLAHOMA Syllabus A products liability action was instituted in an Oklahoma st,ate court by respondents husband and wife to recover for personal injuries sustained in Oklahoma in an accident involving an automobile that had been purchased by them in New York while they were New York residents and that was being driven through Oklahoma at the time of the accident. The defendants included the automobile retailer and its wholesaler (petitioners), New York corporations that did no business in Oklahoma. Petitioners entered special appearances, claiming that Oklahoma's exercise of jurisdiction over them would offend limitations on the State's jurisdiction imposed by the Due Process Clause of the Fourte...

income-tax Officer Vs. P.N.B. Finance Ltd.

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Reported in : (1983)4ITD665(Delhi)

..... between the compensation of rs. 10.20 crores and the paid-up capital, viz., rs. 8.20 crores, was credited to general reserve of the limited company.3. after the nationalisation of the punjab national bank ltd., the company carried on business in terras of the following resolution adopted at the extraordinary general meeting of the company held on 20-1 .....

Sushil Kumar Chakraborty and ors. Vs. Lic of India and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : (1984)ILLJ503Cal

..... that section 11 has recognised the need for bringing uniformity in service conditions of employees of different insurance companies who have become the employees of the corporation in view of nationalisation. but by the impugned order of 1978, the government purported to exercise power under section 11(2) with regard to the development officers appointed by it without any purpose of .....