Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: coking coal mines nationalisation act 1972 section 4 acquisition of right in coking coal mines Sorted by: old Page 1 of about 194 results (0.155 seconds)

Tara Prasad Singh and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1980SC1682; (1980)4SCC179; [1980]3SCR1042

..... they are two distinct minerals.in support of these submissions shri seervai relies very strongly on the definition of 'coal mine' in section 2(b) of the coal mines (nationalisation act, 26 of 1973, and the definition, by contrast, of 'coking coal mine' in section 3(c) of the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 36 of 1972.54. these submissions are met by the learned attorney general with the answer that if ..... point the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act of 1972 and the coal mines (nationalisation) act of 1973 cover the whole field of 'coal' which was intended to be nationalised. the titles of the two acts and the various provisions contained therein show that what was being nationalised was three distinct categories of mines : mines containing seams of coking coal exclusively; mines containing seams of coking coal along with seams of other coal; and mines containing seams of other coal. though .....

Sanjeev Coke Manufacturing Company Vs. Bharat Coking Coal Limited and ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1983SC239; 1982(2)SCALE1193; (1983)1SCC147; [1983]1SCR1000

..... already nationalised under the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act are left out of the coal mines (taking over of management) act and the coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1973. of course, coke oven plants situated away from the mines are not touched by either the coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1973 or the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972.7. the final result of these statutes is that all coal mines known to exist in the country are nationalised, whether they are coking coal mines or non-coking coal mines .....

Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. Vs. Smt. Maina Devi and ors.

Court : Patna

..... right, title and interest of the plaintiff and his predecessor-in-interest over the suit property vested in the central government by operation of the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972, coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1973 and other corresponding acts? if so, whether the plaintiff has got any valid right, title and interest in such properly for ..... title and interest of the plaintiff and his pred-ecessors-in-interest over the suit property vested in the central government by the operation of the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972 and/or any other corresponding act? but the aforesaid judgment was set aside by the order dated 30-10-1998 in an appeal ..... of khata nos. 1 and 2 of village durgapuralong with the suit land vested in the central government by the operation of the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972 (hereinafter referred to as the 'nationalisation act'). according to the defendant, the land of khata no. 1 originally belonged to one p.o. hamir & co. .....

Thressiamma Jacob and ors Vs. Geologist,dptt.of Mining and Geology And ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... corporation limited, a government company within the meaning of section 617 of the companies act, 1956. [28]. section 4 of coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972 4(1) on the appointed day, the right, title and interest of the owners in relation to the coking coal mines specified in the first schedule shall stand transferred to, and shall vest absolutely in, the central government, free from all ..... the proprietary rights of the state in the mineral wealth not does it contain any provision divesting any owner of a mine of his proprietary rights. on the other hand, various enactments made by the parliament such as coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972 and coal bearing areas (acquisition and development) act, 1957 make express declarations under section 4 and 7 respectively[26]. providing for acquisition .....

1.P.K.M.Selvam Vs. 1.State Through

Court : Chennai

..... proprietary rights of the state in the mineral wealth nor does it contain any provision divesting any owner of a mine of his proprietary rights. on the other hand, various enactments made by parliament such as the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972 and the coal bearing areas (acquisition and development) act, 1957 make express declarations under sections 4 and 7 respectively providing for acquisition of ..... the mines and right in or over the land from which coal is obtainable. if the understanding of the state of kerala that in view .....

M.R. Govindan and Another Vs. The District Collector, Kancheepuram

Court : Chennai

..... the proprietary rights of the state in the mineral wealth nor does it contain any provision divesting any owner of a mine of his proprietary rights. on the other hand, various enactments made by the parliament such as coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972 and coal bearing areas (acquisition and development) act, 1957 make express declarations under section 4 and 7 respectively providing for acquisition of ..... the mines and rights in or over the land from which coal is obtainable. if the understanding of the state of kerala that in view of .....

Dr. M Basappa Reddy Vs. State of Karnataka, Rep. by its Chief Secretar ...

Court : Karnataka

..... in the mineral wealth nor does it contain any provision divesting any owner of a mine of his proprietary rights. on the other hand, various enactments made by the parliament, such as the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972 and the coal bearing areas (acquisition and development) act, 1957 make express declarations under sections 4 ..... and 7 of the act providing for acquisition of the mines and rights in or over the land from which coal is obtainable." the hon'ble apex ..... movement of iron ore and manganese ore; further, the petitioner has deliberately committed omissions and commissions while working as a director, in contravention of the mines and mineral development regulation act, 1957 (for short, 'mmdr act'); he issued 41 permits through his subordinate territorial officers during the year 2004 .....

Bharat Coking Coal Limited Vs. Kalachand Mitra and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : (1977)ILLJ27Cal

..... that the writ of mandamus issued by the learned judge in the trial court declaring the respondent-petitioner kalachand mitra to be entitled to the benefits of section 17 of coking coal mines (nationalisation act) 1972 must be upheld. it is not in dispute that the said respondent would be entitled to such benefits if it be found that immediately before the appointed day ..... , 1971 and the 'appointed day' as mentioned hereinbefore remained the same. thereafter, on or about january 12, 1972, bharat coking coal ltd., the appellants herein, a government company, were appointed as the custodian of the said colliery. then came the parliamentary legislation of coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972 on august 17, 1972 (hereinafter referred to as the 1972 act), making provisions for the acquisition and .....

industrial Supplies Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and or ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1980SC1858; [1980(41)FLR248]; (1980)4SCC341; [1981]1SCR375; 1980(12)LC863(SC)

..... by the central government, in the public interest, of the management of 214 coking coal mines and 12 coke oven plants, including the coal mines in question, pending nationalisation of such mines. the ordinance was replaced by the coking coal mines (emergency provisions) act, 1971. thereafter, parliament enacted the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972 to complete the process of nationalisation of the coking coal mines and coke oven plants. it was entitled as 'an act to provide for the ..... acquisition and transfer of the right, title and interest of the owners of the coking coal mines specified in the .....

Shethia Mining and Manufacturing Corporation Ltd. Vs. Commercial Tax O ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : [1977]39STC246(Cal)

..... were very much different from the facts of the instant case before me. further, in the view i have taken of the effect of section 3 of the coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1973, it is not necessary for me to rest my decision on the ratio of the aforesaid decision referred to hereinbefore. in an appropriate case, if ..... the same management;(x) all lands, buildings and equipments belonging to the owners of the mine and in, adjacent to or situated on the surface of, the mine where the washing of coal obtained from the mine or manufacture therefrom, of coke is carried on ;(xi) all lands and buildings [other than those referred to in sub-clause (x)] wherever ..... the same management;(x) all lands, buildings and equipments, belonging to the owner of the mine and in, adjacent to, or situated on, the surface of the mine where the washing of coal obtained from the mine or manufacture, therefrom, of coke is carried on ;(xi) all lands and buildings [other than those referred to in sub-clause (x)] .....