Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: coking coal mines nationalisation act 1972 section 4 acquisition of right in coking coal mines Court: punjab and haryana Page 1 of about 3 results (0.076 seconds)

Apr 19 1995 (HC)

Maruti Udyog Ltd. Vs. Ram Lal and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (1996)IIILLJ1121P& H; (1995)111PLR575

..... of the supreme court holding that the employees are not a liability, therefore, section 9 was not attracted. it was further held that in terms of section 17 of the coking coals mines nationalisation act, 1972, which is analogous to section 13 of the acquisition act before us the dismissed workmen who had been reinstated by the tribunal would be deemed to be the ..... ltd. the industrial tribunal as per its award dated july 1, 1972 directed reinstatement of the workmen. section 9 of the coking coal mines nationalisation act, 1972 whereby the colliery was nationalised is similar to section 5 of the acquisition act with which we are concerned in the present case. relying on the provisions of section 9, the government company contended that .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 11 1993 (HC)

Barjinder Singh Vs. State of Punjab Through the Chief Secretary for th ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (1993)104PLR1

..... the invasion of the right what determines invasion of the right and attracts jurisdiction of the courts is the effect of the law and the action upon the right (bank nationalisation case, a i. r. 1979 s. c. 564, quoted in indian express private limited v. mnion of india, a. i. r. 1986 s. c. 782.) the courts have to guard .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 11 1993 (HC)

Barjinder Singh, Chief Editor, the Daily Ajit Vs. State of Punjab and ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : 1993CriLJ2040

..... the invasion of the right. what determines invasion of the right and attracts jurisdiction of the courts is the effect of the law and the action upon the right. bank nationalisation case air 1970 sc 564 quoted in indian express private limited v. union of india, air 1986 sc 782 (sic).) the courts have to guard fundamental rights by considering the .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //