Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: coking coal mines nationalisation act 1972 section 2 declaration as to the policy of the state Page 1 of about 113 results (0.286 seconds)

Assam Sillimanite Ltd. and Another Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1992SC938; JT1992(2)SC434; 1991(2)SCALE1309; 1992Supp(1)SCC692; [1991]Supp3SCR273; 1992(1)LC288(SC)

..... the common good of the people and would be clearly covered by clause (b) of article 39.34. in sanjeev coke manufacturing company (supra), the constitutional validity of coking coals mines (nationalisation) act, 1972 and the coal mines (taking over of management) act, 1973 was under challenge. the court said that when article 39(b) refers ..... capable of producing wealth for the community would be material resources. the conservation of the essential ingredients necessary for the crucial iron and steel industry by nationalisation is only in implementation of the policy declared in clause (b) of article 39.36. in the recent decision of this court in tinsukhia electric ..... interpreted in the earlier decisions of this court32. in state of karnataka v. ranganatha reddy (supra), the karnataka contract carriages acquisition act, 1976 for nationalisation of contract carriages in the state was challenged on the ground that there is no real and substantial nexus between the purpose of the acquisition and .....

Property Owners' Association and Ors. etc. etc. Vs. State of Maharasht ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2001SC1668; JT2001(4)SC152; 2001(2)SCALE523; (2001)4SCC455; 2001(2)LC858(SC)

..... he has said in his judgment in this regard'.5. the need to interpret article 39(b) again arose in the case of sanjeev coke . and anr. : [1983]1scr1000 . while upholding the validity of coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972 and the two other connected enactments the constitution bench adopted the interpretation of article 39(b) as enunciated by krishna iyer, ..... of the opinion that the views expressed in sanjeev coke's case require reconsideration. keeping in view the importance of the point in issue, namely, the interpretation of article 39(b) it will be appropriate if these ..... the interpretation put on article 39(b) by krishna iyer, j. in ranganatha reddy's case was not specifically assented to in the majority decision but in sanjeev coke's case (supra) it is the observations in the judgment of krishna iyer, j. which have been followed.7. having heard the counsel at length, we are .....

industrial Supplies Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and or ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1980SC1858; [1980(41)FLR248]; (1980)4SCC341; [1981]1SCR375; 1980(12)LC863(SC)

..... by the central government, in the public interest, of the management of 214 coking coal mines and 12 coke oven plants, including the coal mines in question, pending nationalisation of such mines. the ordinance was replaced by the coking coal mines (emergency provisions) act, 1971. thereafter, parliament enacted the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972 to complete the process of nationalisation of the coking coal mines and coke oven plants. it was entitled as 'an act to provide for the ..... acquisition and transfer of the right, title and interest of the owners of the coking coal mines specified in the .....

Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. Vs. the Raneegunge Coal Association Ltd. and o ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : (1978)4SCC299; 1978(10)LC529(SC)

..... all stocks, of coal, plant and machinery, etc. on which the bank had the first charge, stood transferred to and vested in the central government free ..... stores, stocks of coal, etc. loans were also extended by the bank to the raneegunge goal association under two seperate loan accounts. the bank claimed a decree for the total of the amount due to it in the cash credit account and the loan accounts. it was pleaded that under the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972, when ..... joint receivers. indeed, there has been a fair degree of contentious argument before us with reference to the various provisions of the coking coal mines (emergency provisions) act, 1971 and the coking coal a-fines (nationalisation) act, 1972. we do not think it necessary or advisable to express our view on any of these questions at this stage .....

Madan Mohan Vadehra Vs. Bharat Coking Coal Company Ltd. and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : [2003(1)JCR230(Jhr)]

..... respondent no. 1, company as per extended definition of 'mines' as defined in the relevant coal mines nationalisation act, 1972 and as per the decision of the supreme court in bharat coking coal limited v. madan lal agrawal, reported in (1997) 1 scc 177. 5. from the pleading made by the ..... right and title.the question raised by the respondents as to whether the title to the property came to be vested with the respondents as a result of coal mines nationalisation act or not is itself a question of fact.it is a settled law that where a complicated questions of title arise for decision, the summary proceeding ..... records of right prepared in the year 1925 it is recorded to be owned by m/s. bengal coal company limited. the lands vested with respondent no. 1, company - m/s. bccl on the enactment of the coal mines nationalisation act 1972. the landed property in question has been vested absolutely and free from all encumbrance in favour of .....

1.P.K.M.Selvam Vs. 1.State Through

Court : Chennai

..... proprietary rights of the state in the mineral wealth nor does it contain any provision divesting any owner of a mine of his proprietary rights. on the other hand, various enactments made by parliament such as the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972 and the coal bearing areas (acquisition and development) act, 1957 make express declarations under sections 4 and 7 respectively providing for acquisition of ..... the mines and right in or over the land from which coal is obtainable. if the understanding of the state of kerala that in view .....

Sanjeev Coke Manufacturing Company Vs. Bharat Coking Coal Limited and ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1983SC239; 1982(2)SCALE1193; (1983)1SCC147; [1983]1SCR1000

..... already nationalised under the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act are left out of the coal mines (taking over of management) act and the coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1973. of course, coke oven plants situated away from the mines are not touched by either the coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1973 or the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972.7. the final result of these statutes is that all coal mines known to exist in the country are nationalised, whether they are coking coal mines or non-coking coal mines .....

Bhanu Pratap Singh and anr. Vs. the State of Jharkhand and anr.

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : [2006(4)JCR298(Jhr)]

..... learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that some back grounds would be necessary for better appreciation of this case and those are that the coal mines was taken by the erstwhile colliery from the rightful owner under permanent settlement through a registered deed giving some right over the lease hold area ..... and after settlement the erstwhile colliery were doing mining operation until nationalization of the coal mines by virtue of enactment of cooking coal mines (nationalization) act, 1972. after nationalization, the petitioners had been doing mining operation without any hindrance till the year 1999, when forest official directed the chief ..... stated herein.3. or 26.8.2003 during the routine inspection forest guard noticed that the petitioners by deployment of huge work force extracted and mined out coal about 900 mt from the ghanudih protected forest area. thereupon the opposite parly no. 2 filed a prosecution report. upon which the case .....

Bastacolla Colliery Co. Pvt. Ltd. and ors. Vs. Central Bank of India a ...

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : [2007(4)JCR544(Jhr)]

..... of the court below on the ground that the learned court below had committed serious error of law in misconstruing and misreading the provisions of the coking coal mines (nationalization) act and that the learned court below had failed to frame relevant issue on the basis of the pleadings of the parties including the ..... dues. further pleadings of the contesting defendants was that the plaintiff-bank has filed his claim before the commissioner of payments in accordance with the provisions of coking coal mines (nationalization) act, 1972 and, therefore, the bank could not simultaneously resort to filing its claim by way of civil suit.4. on the basis of ..... the instant case. this plea of the appellant is also not tenable.15. section 23 of the coking coal mines (nationalization) act, 1972 contains provisions wherein parties having any claim against the erstwhile owner of a coal mine which has vested under the provisions of nationalization act, may prefer a claim before the commissioner of payments .....

Employees in Relation to Industry Colliery of Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. ...

Court : Patna

..... to as the emergency provisions act), which provided for taking over of the management of the coking coal mines by the central government from the appointed day i.e. october 17, 1971. thereafter coking coal mines (nationalisation act), 1972 (hereinafter referred to as the nationalisation act) was passed, whereby and whereunder on the appointed day, i.e. may 1 ..... , 1972 the right, title and interest of the owners in relation to the coking coal mines specified in the first schedule stood transferred to ..... in which these workmen were working till june 9, 1971. by operation of section 4 of the nationalisation act, the right, title and interest of the owners in relation to the coking coal mines stood transferred to and vested in the central government, free from all encumbrances. by the said act .....