Court : Mumbai Nagpur
..... not the market value. the learned in-charge government pleader in this respect relies on the judgments of the apex court in sanjeevcoke manufacturing company vs. m/s. bharat coking coal limited and another {(1983) 1 scc 147}, maharashtra state electricity board vs. thana electric supply co. and others {(1989) 3 scc 616}, state of maharashtra and ..... this effect in the act is fully supported by the undisputed facts mentioned in the statement of objects and reasons and the preamble. the alternative to the nationalisation of this industry in the manner it is done by this act is liquidation and unemployment of all the employees of the undertaking. the act ensures continuance ..... under article 31c of the constitution. the observations of apex court in paras 43, 44 and 48 are relevant, which read thus : 43) the idea of nationalisation of a material resource of the community cannot be divorced from the idea of distribution of that resource in the community in a manner, which advances common good. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai Nagpur
..... nothing left for making any regulations and much less to the contrary. 7. our attention is invited to section 52 of the mines act and judgment of hon'ble supreme court in the case of jaswant singh gill .vrs. bharat coking coal ltd. and others reported in (2007) 1 scc 663 and judgment of this court in writ petition no. 3430/2010 ..... of earned leave and 293 days of half pay leave. 3. the facts which are not in dispute are as under: on 03.03.1976, the petitioner joined the nationalised coal sector as assistant welfare officer (trainee) in western coalfields limited at korba and continued there till 12.06.1984. thereafter, he was posted from 14.06.1984 to 30 ..... was levied. the petitioner asked for leave encashment of 220 days earned leave with full pay and 219 days half pay leave after deduction of coal mine's provident fund as per section 52[8] of the mines act, 1952. however, that request was rejected on the ground that the leave encashment is not admissible to the employees whose services are .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai Nagpur
..... left for making any regulations and much less to the contrary. 7. our attention is invited to section 52 of the mines act and judgment of hon'ble supreme court in the case of jaswant singh gill .vrs. bharat coking coal ltd. and others reported in (2007) 1 scc 663 and judgment of this court in writ petition no. 3430/2010 ..... of earned leave and 293 days of half pay leave. 3. the facts which are not in dispute are as under: on 03.03.1976, the petitioner joined the nationalised coal sector as assistant welfare officer (trainee) in western coalfields limited at korba and continued there till 12.06.1984. thereafter, he was posted from 14.06.1984 to 30. ..... was levied. the petitioner asked for leave encashment of 220 days earned leave with full pay and 219 days half pay leave after deduction of coal mine's provident fund as per section 52[8] of the mines act, 1952. however, that request was rejected on the ground that the leave encashment is not admissible to the employees whose services are .....
Tag this Judgment!