Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: coking coal mines nationalisation act 1972 section 19 superannuation welfare and other funds Page 9 of about 170 results (1.242 seconds)

Action Committee Unaided Recognized Private School Vs. Honble Lt.Gover ...

Court : Delhi

..... shri ashoke sen drew pointed attention to the earlier affidavits filed on behalf of bharat coking coal limited and commented severely on the alleged contradictory reasons given therein for the exclusion of certain coke oven plants from the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act. but, in the ultimate analysis, we are not really to concern ourselves ..... is presumed not to have intended an excess of jurisdiction. in sanjeev coke mfg. co. v. bharat coking coal ltd. the constitution bench speaking through chinnappa reddy, j., had observed, in the context of interpretation of the provisions of the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972 that the court is not concerned with the statements made ..... of his submissions, he relied upon the judgments of the supreme court in mr. x vs. hospital z , (1998) 8 scc296 sanjeev coke manufacturing company vs. m/s. bharat coking coal limited and another, (supra); and n.k. bajpai vs. union of india and another, (2012) 4 scc653 47. consequently, according to .....

Maruti Udyog Ltd. Vs. Ram Lal and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2005SC851; 2005(5)ALLMR(SC)405; [2005(104)FLR820]; JT2005(1)SC449; (2005)ILLJ853SC; (2005)2SCC638; 2005(2)SLJ358(SC); (2005)2UPLBEC1470

..... on 9.6.1971 owing to operational and financial problems and later on the management was taken over by the central government under the coking coal mines (emergency provisions) act, 1971 followed by the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972. before the said bench, the decision in anakapalla cooperative agricultural and industrial society ltd. (supra) was referred to but ..... before the appointed day' contained in section 13 of the said act vis-a-vis section 17 of the 1972 act is of some importance. the coking coal mines which stood nationalized by reason of the 1972 act were running concerns whereas admittedly the undertaking of the company had not been functioning and the enactment ..... ors. : (1978)iillj17sc and workmen represented by akhil bhartiy koyla kamgar union (supra) rendered on interpretation of provisions of section 17 of the coking coal mines (nationalization) act, 1972 (hereinafter referred to as 'the 1972 act'). it is no doubt true that the provisions of section 17 of the .....

The Indian Cable Co. Ltd. Vs. Lodna Colliery Co. (1920) Ltd.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1977Cal402

..... ltd. v. n, c. mehta reported in (1977) .81 cal wn 380: (air 1977 noc 198) (cal). here, a division bench held that the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972 which was in pari materia with the statute in the instant case, did not take away the jurisdiction of the civil courts. the said act, ..... j. mitra, learned counsel for the plaintiff submitted on the other hand that, only two questions arose for determination in this case. firstly, whether after the promulgation of the coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1973, a suit would lie in a civil court for a claim which could be realised under the act, and secondly, if a claim had once been ..... the defendant has filed its written statement denying the allegations in the plaint. it is contended further that the suit is not maintainable by virtue of the provisions of the coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as the said act),4. the only issue raised and settled at the trial was -- is the suit maintainable by reason of .....

Maruti Udyog Ltd. Vs. Ram Lal and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (1996)IIILLJ1121P& H; (1995)111PLR575

..... of the supreme court holding that the employees are not a liability, therefore, section 9 was not attracted. it was further held that in terms of section 17 of the coking coals mines nationalisation act, 1972, which is analogous to section 13 of the acquisition act before us the dismissed workmen who had been reinstated by the tribunal would be deemed to be the ..... ltd. the industrial tribunal as per its award dated july 1, 1972 directed reinstatement of the workmen. section 9 of the coking coal mines nationalisation act, 1972 whereby the colliery was nationalised is similar to section 5 of the acquisition act with which we are concerned in the present case. relying on the provisions of section 9, the government company contended that .....

The Commissioner of Payments (Coking Coal) Vs. Sourindra Nath Basu and ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1982Cal605

..... become payable and still payable to the defendant under the coking coal mines nationalisation act, 1972. and it is further ordered that the plaintiffs decree--holder shall be at liberty to proceed with the realisation of their claim before the commissioner ..... paise only be realised by attachment of the sum of rs. 56,500/- being the amount to be paid to the defendant under section 10 of the coking coal mines nationalisation act, 1972 in pro tanto satisfaction thereof. and it is further ordered that the said attachment shall be levied on the compensation money if any, which has ..... in the nature thereof.2. there is no judgment in the matter but the learned judge ordered as follows:'upon reading an application of commissioner of payments (coking coal) (hereinafter referred to as the said applicant) pursuant to a notice of motion dated the first day of july last and upon hearing the advocates for .....

United Commercial Bank Vs. Kuya Collieries (P.) Ltd. and ors.

Court : Patna

..... blt page 181. hon'ble justice satyeshwar roy, as then he was, held that the civil court's jurisdiction has not been ousted by the provisions of coking coal mines (nationalisation) act and a claim by a creditor can be maintained in civil suit against the owner of the colliery and it was further held that section 23 of the ..... or right to sue. the suit is barred under the provisions of t.p. act and that the civil court has got no jurisdiction after coming of the coal mines nationalisation act(hereinafter referred to as the act). as per provisions of the act, the same claims were preferred by the banking authorities before the assistant commissioner of ..... 97,017.91 p. the loan was taken by the defendant no. 1 for the development of coal mines and benefit of the said colliery. it is submitted that the coal mines of the defendant no. 1 was nationalised as per provisions of coal mines nationalisation act and the account of defendant no. 1 was frozen after the implementation of the vesting to the .....

Bharat Cooking Coal Limited Vs. State of Bihar and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 1994(2)BLJR899; JT1994(4)SC173; 1994(2)SCALE1011; (1994)5SCC129; [1994]Supp1SCR112

..... 'the company'), a joint stock company, had filed the suit, out of which the present appeal has arisen. the company was carrying on coal mining operations in village kenduadih in the district of dhanbad. after the enactment of coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972 a notification was issued by the central government by which the right, title and interest of the company got vested in m ..... /s. bharat coking coal limited (in short 'bccl') which is an undertaking under the central government with effect from 1st may, 1972. accordingly bccl was substituted .....

1.P.K.M.Selvam Vs. 1.State Through

Court : Chennai

..... proprietary rights of the state in the mineral wealth nor does it contain any provision divesting any owner of a mine of his proprietary rights. on the other hand, various enactments made by parliament such as the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972 and the coal bearing areas (acquisition and development) act, 1957 make express declarations under sections 4 and 7 respectively providing for acquisition of ..... the mines and right in or over the land from which coal is obtainable. if the understanding of the state of kerala that in view .....

State of Haryana and anr. Vs. Chanan Mal and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1976SC1654; [1976(32)FLR353]; (1977)1SCC340; [1976]3SCR688

..... act, 1950, section 5(2) of the west bengal estate acquisition act, 1953 (as amended by act 22 of 1964); coal bearing areas (acquisition and development) act, 1957; coking coal mines (nationalisation) act 1972, and coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1973. in any case, until parliament legislates to acquire ownership of mineral deposits in a state, this field cannot be ..... control of which by the union is declared by parliament by law to be expedient in the public interest.' furthermore, the coal company relied on entry 54 of list i relating to mines and mineral development, already set out above. this court held that the imposition of the cess under the state enactment ..... to carry out such detailed investigations for the purpose of obtaining such information as may be necessary:provided that in the cases of prospecting licences or mining leases granted by a state government no such authorisation shall be made except after consultation with the state government. the remaining clauses (2) to (6 .....

Rastriya Colliery Mazdoor Sangh Vs. Presiding Officer, Central Governm ...

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : [2003(1)JCR453(Jhr)]

..... through manipulations and by practicing fraud although he was never employed in the colliery. the management further stated that after promulgation of the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972, the previous owner entered into litigation and upon orders of the calcutta high court, a receiver was appointed. finally, the supreme court upheld ..... been transmitted to him for adjudication. the reference for adjudication was as follows :'whether the action of the management of bhowra north ocp of m/s. bharat coking coal ltd., in dismissing shri manoj kumar sinha, fitter helper, w.e.f. 29.10.1987 is justified? if not, to what relief the concerned workman entitled ..... the nationalisation act and the bhowra coke oven plant was ultimately handed over to bccl by the receiver. the management stated that it was the case of the concerned workman that he .....