Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: coking coal mines nationalisation act 1972 section 19 superannuation welfare and other funds Court: kolkata Page 1 of about 3 results (0.172 seconds)

Bharat Aluminium Company Limited and ors. Vs. Sukumar Mukherjee and or ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : (1998)2CALLT60(HC),[1999(81)FLR52],(1999)ILLJ828Cal

..... pathak, reported in 1986 pljr 1168. in that case also, upon consideration of the provisions of sections 9 and 17 as also the provisions of the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, as also provisions of section 4 of the payment of gratuity act. sandhawlla. c.j, speaking for the bench stated:'equally worthy of notice ..... an award has been made by the industrial tribunal, would continue to be governed by the nationalisation act. in that case, the apex court was considering the provisions of sections 9 and 17 of the coking coal mines nationalisation act, which are in part materia with the provisions of the said act. the apex court ..... hereinafter referred to as the said act), whereby and whereunder the undertaking of the aluminium corporation of india limited (hereinafter called as aluminium corporation) was nationalised. the aforementioned nationalisation was made for giving effect to the policy decision as laid down under article 39(6) of the constitution of india. according to the writ .....

Coal India Limited Vs. Nicco Corporation Limited

Court : Kolkata

..... , a notice under section 446 of the companies act to the commissioner of payments appointed under the 1973 act and a further notice on the commissioner of payments under the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972 requesting such commissioners to refrain from settling the claims of, or making payment to, the creditors or contributories of the company (in liquidation) without obtaining leave of the ..... of commercial energy in the country and though it was available in adequate quantity the reserves were unevenly distributed among the different regions. it noticed that coking coal mines had been nationalised (under the 1972 act) and that non-coking coal collieries were small in size, financially weak and worked on unscientific lines with the colliery owners' primary object being to earn quick profits without any .....

Bharat Coking Coal Limited Vs. Kalachand Mitra and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : (1977)ILLJ27Cal

..... that the writ of mandamus issued by the learned judge in the trial court declaring the respondent-petitioner kalachand mitra to be entitled to the benefits of section 17 of coking coal mines (nationalisation act) 1972 must be upheld. it is not in dispute that the said respondent would be entitled to such benefits if it be found that immediately before the appointed day ..... , 1971 and the 'appointed day' as mentioned hereinbefore remained the same. thereafter, on or about january 12, 1972, bharat coking coal ltd., the appellants herein, a government company, were appointed as the custodian of the said colliery. then came the parliamentary legislation of coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972 on august 17, 1972 (hereinafter referred to as the 1972 act), making provisions for the acquisition and .....

Sree Jagadamba Coke Mfg. Enterprises and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1989Cal337

..... be set out hereunder :(a) damagoria colliery was not even regarded by the authorities as containing coking coal and it was in fact not nationalised under the coking coal mines (nationalisation act, 1972). it was nationalised under the coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1973 which provided for nationalisation of non-coking coal mines.(b) premium fuels is the first coke oven plant in west bengal being established in 1974 at a distance of about 2 k.m ..... supplies from about 50 collieries situated in the state of bihar. most of these coke oven plants in bihar were established immediately after the nationalisation of the coal mines and during the period of 1973-74.(e) the coke oven plants in the state of bihar were never dependent upon the supply of coal from collieries in other states, particularly in west bengal and drawing of .....

Bharat Coking Coal Limited. Vs. Jharia Talkies and Cold Storage Privat ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : (1992)2CALLT357(HC),97CWN122

..... the coking coal mines (emergency provisions) ordinance, later replaced by the coking coal mines (emergency provisions) ordinance, later replaced by the coking coal mines (emergency provision) act, 1971, the central government took over the management of all coking coal mines/coke oven plants. the appellant herein, which was constituted on 1st january, 1972, was appointed by the central government, as custodian of coking coal mines/coke oven plants. subsequently, by virtue of the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972, all coking coal mines/coke oven .....

income-tax Officer Vs. East Indian Coal Co. Ltd

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Kolkata

Reported in : (2000)73ITD230(Kol.)

..... , the interest of rs. 67,49,553 cannot be treated as income accrued to the assessee; there being diversion of income by overriding charge created by the statutes [both the coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1973 and the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972]. we, therefore, do not see any infirmity in the orders of the cit(a). the appeals filed by the revenue are, therefore, dismissed. ..... incorporated under the u.k. companies act.it has coal mines in the state of bihar. the management of the coking coal mines was taken over by the central government on 17th october, 1971 and were thereafter nationalised on 1st may, 1972. in the case of non-coking coal mines, the management was taken over on 30th january, 1973 and nationalised on 1st may, 1973. under the aforesaid acts, assessee .....

The Indian Cable Co. Ltd. Vs. Lodna Colliery Co. (1920) Ltd.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1977Cal402

..... ltd. v. n, c. mehta reported in (1977) .81 cal wn 380: (air 1977 noc 198) (cal). here, a division bench held that the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972 which was in pari materia with the statute in the instant case, did not take away the jurisdiction of the civil courts. the said act, ..... j. mitra, learned counsel for the plaintiff submitted on the other hand that, only two questions arose for determination in this case. firstly, whether after the promulgation of the coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1973, a suit would lie in a civil court for a claim which could be realised under the act, and secondly, if a claim had once been ..... the defendant has filed its written statement denying the allegations in the plaint. it is contended further that the suit is not maintainable by virtue of the provisions of the coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as the said act),4. the only issue raised and settled at the trial was -- is the suit maintainable by reason of .....

The Commissioner of Payments (Coking Coal) Vs. Sourindra Nath Basu and ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1982Cal605

..... become payable and still payable to the defendant under the coking coal mines nationalisation act, 1972. and it is further ordered that the plaintiffs decree--holder shall be at liberty to proceed with the realisation of their claim before the commissioner ..... paise only be realised by attachment of the sum of rs. 56,500/- being the amount to be paid to the defendant under section 10 of the coking coal mines nationalisation act, 1972 in pro tanto satisfaction thereof. and it is further ordered that the said attachment shall be levied on the compensation money if any, which has ..... in the nature thereof.2. there is no judgment in the matter but the learned judge ordered as follows:'upon reading an application of commissioner of payments (coking coal) (hereinafter referred to as the said applicant) pursuant to a notice of motion dated the first day of july last and upon hearing the advocates for .....

Arjun Agarwalla Vs. Baidya Nath Roy and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1980Cal354

..... 31-12-1970 or from 17-10-1971 when the business undertaking was taken over by the government under the provisions of coking coal mines (emergency) provisions ordinance 1971 which ultimately culminated in nationalisation of the said business under the provisions of coking coal mines (nationalisation) act 1972. this allegation of dissolution is denied by the respondents nos. 1 and 3 who are contesting this application. it is .....

Turner Morrison Limited Vs. Bharat Coking Coal Ltd.

Court : Kolkata

..... act, the defendant discovered certain materials and documents to show that by operation of law the said premises has vested by operation of the provisions of the coking coal mines nationalization act, 1972. the property has vested in the defendant and in obligation to pay view any thereof, rent and the defendant occupation has charges. no ..... time was with allahabad bank who was a tenant in respect of the suit premises. accordingly the contention of the defendant that at the time when the coking coal mines nationalization act, 1972 came into force, lodna colliery was owner of the property in question is not only absurd but contrary to record. in support of ..... , the reliance was placed on a schedule to the coaking coal mines nationalization act, 1972 in order to sustain a plea of ownership in respect of the suit premises. mr.dutta has referred to a decision of the hon ble supreme court in bharat coking coal limited versus madanlal agarwal reported at air1997supreme court 1599 and contended .....