Court : Punjab and Haryana
Reported in : (1996)IIILLJ1121P& H; (1995)111PLR575
..... of the supreme court holding that the employees are not a liability, therefore, section 9 was not attracted. it was further held that in terms of section 17 of the coking coals mines nationalisation act, 1972, which is analogous to section 13 of the acquisition act before us the dismissed workmen who had been reinstated by the tribunal would be deemed to be the ..... ltd. the industrial tribunal as per its award dated july 1, 1972 directed reinstatement of the workmen. section 9 of the coking coal mines nationalisation act, 1972 whereby the colliery was nationalised is similar to section 5 of the acquisition act with which we are concerned in the present case. relying on the provisions of section 9, the government company contended that .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Reported in : AIR1997P& H87
..... and (2) forbid discrimination against any citizen on the ground of sex, the state may discriminate against males by making a special provision in favour of females.' (underlining is mine).52. in girdhar gopal v. state, air 1953 madh bha 147, a learned single judge has held :--'the discrimination that is prohibited under art. 15(1) is a ..... securing our personal freedom is efficient, but our procedure for preventing the power is not. just as the pick and shovel is no longer suitable for the winning of coal, so also the procedure of mandamus, certiorari and actions on the case arc not suitable for the winning of freedom in the new age. they must be replaced ..... of the matter i did not express any opinion regarding validity of regulation 5 in chapter vii(ii) of the punjab university calendar, volume iii. this view of mine on the preliminary objection has not been concurred by the brother judges constituting the full bench who are equally divided in regard to the validity of the regulation in .....
Tag this Judgment!