Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: coking coal mines nationalisation act 1972 section 1 short title and commencement Page 15 of about 1,600 results (0.221 seconds)

Coal India Limited Vs. Khirod Chandra Chakraborty and anr.

Court : Guwahati

..... has filed this second appeal. 6. there is no dispute that the right, title and interest of artc in the coal mine named'borgolai' situted at post office borgolai was acquired by the central government by the coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1973. the name of this mine finds place in the schedule to the act at serial no. 4. 7. the only question that arises for ..... the same management; (x) all lands, buildings and equipments belonging to the owners of the mine, and in, adjacent to or situated on the surface of, the mine where the washing of coal obtained from the mine or manufacture, therefrom, of coke is carried on; (xi) all lands and buildings other than those referred to in sub-clause (x) wherever situated, if solely used for .....

Ashoke Kr. Banerjee Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1990Cal409,94CWN1194

..... is a case of composite lease or a lease exclusively for winning fire clay, the bar of s. 3(3)(a) read with subsection (2) of s. 30 of the coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1973 prohibits the winning or mining of coal simpliciter even in case of a lease exclusively for winning fire clay if it becomes impossible to win fire clay without winning ..... of india reported in : [1980]3scr1042 . that is a land mark case deciding the rights of owners of mine in respect of both coking coal mines and coal mines proper as also composite mines in which there are alternate seams of coal and fire clay. common experience has it that coal and fire clay are frequently found together in the bowels of earth like twins in the womb of .....

industrial Fuel Marketing Co. and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and or ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1985Cal143,89CWN263

..... the impugned lease, the appellants have not been conferred with any right of carrying on a coal mining operation, nor such right relates to winning or mining of coal. ' accordingly, clauses (a) and (b) of sub-section (3) of section 3 of the coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1973 has no manner of application.12. now the question is whether the sludge ..... the appellants.the appellants and their representatives were also prevented from going to the concerned sites for the purpose of lifting any ejected sludge or slurry for manufacturing soft coke by the officers of the respondent no. 3. accordingly, the appellants filed a writ petition, inter alia, praying for the quashing of the said petarbar p. ..... the indenture of lease. on april 2, 1980, six lorries which were loaded with sludge or slurry and soft coke manufactured out of the same were seized by the police on the complaint of the central coal fields ltd., the respondent no. 3. it is alleged that the respondent no. 3 has been trying to remove .....

Tinsukhia Electric Supply Co. Ltd. Vs. State of Assam and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1990SC123; (1989)3SCC709; 1989(2)LC712(SC)

..... as the resources of the community, noticed the contention urged in that case thus:.the submission of shri a.k. sen was that neither a coal mine nor a coke oven plant owned by private parties was a 'material resources of the community'. according to the learned counsel they would become material resources of the community ..... the vestibuleof the undertakings in the state and those pertaining to the quantification of the 'amount' are integral and inseparable parts of the integral scheme of nationalisation and d not admit of being considered as distinct provisions independent of each other.17. the memorandum of the writ petition contains averments as to the ..... undertakings were discharging their obligations to the consumers efficiently and satisfactorily. the case of the petitioners is that there was no justification at all for the nationalisation as the undertakings were efficient and fully catered to the needs of the consume7rs. it was also averred that it was the government and the board .....

Valley Refractories Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. K.S. Garewal

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1978Cal574,83CWN53

..... as regards person or property, are subject to strict construction in the same way as penal acts. there cannot be any dispute that a provision of this nature, as the coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1973, must receive strict construction. if there is any golden rule of construction or interpretation it is that the statutes must be read as a whole reasonably, fairly and ..... or below ground, in or adjacent to or belonging to a coal mine; provided that it shall not include any part of the coal mine on which a manufacturing process is being carried on unless such process is a process for coke-making or the dressing of minerals. an amended definition was provided by the coal mines provident fund & bonus schemes (amendment) act, 1965 and the same .....

Misra Agencies and anr. Etc. Vs. State of Orissa and ors.

Court : Orissa

Reported in : AIR1988Ori257; 65(1988)CLT312

..... these writ applications are as follows :the petitioners are dealers in coal. some of them are in business for decades. prior to nationalisation of coal mines, they were getting supply of coal from the coat mine owners operating in private-sector as well as from the coal mines operating in public sector. after the ownership of the coal mines vested in the government, it controlled its movement and trading thereof ..... of equality clause enshrined in article 14 of the constitution of india.3. soft coke is an essential commodity governed by the provisions of the essential commodities act and the orissa coal (soft coke) (control and distribution) order, 1980 and is supplied through the public distribution system, but not coal used in brickkilns ('brk for short) and by small scale industries ('ssi' for short .....

Samatha Vs. State of A.P. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1997SC3297; JT1997(6)SC449; 1997(4)SCALE746; (1997)8SCC191; [1997]Supp2SCR305

..... generally by all socialist writers. socialism is, first of all, a protest against the material and cultural poverty inflicted by capitalism on the mass of the people. nationalisation of coal mine for distribution was upheld as a step towards socialism. in state of tamil nadu etc. etc. vs. l. abu kavur bai & ors. etc. [(1984) ..... the state towards securing a directive principle and the connection with the directive principle must not be some remote or tenuous connection. the object of the nationalisation of the coalmine is to distribute nations resources. it was held at page 1023 that though the word 'socialist' was introduced in the preamble by ..... its goal is to undertake distribution as best to sub serve the common good. it reorganises by such distribution the ownership and control." 107. in sanjeev coke manufacturing company vs. bharat coking coal ltd. & anr.[(1983) 1 scr 1000] another constitution bench reiterated the above view; while considering article 39(b) of the constitution, at page .....

Bharat Coking Coal Limited Vs. Kamal Prasad Singh and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : (2001)3CALLT4(HC),[2001(91)FLR778]

..... ltd. and was posted at kendua, dhanbad, bihar. thereafter, he resigned and joined marine coal co. bengal (p) ltd. after the passing of the coal mines nationalisation act. 1972 the government of india took over all the companies and formed coal india limited (hereinafter referred to as cil) under the provisions of companies act, 1956. after ..... colliery. then the government of india de-centralised the work of collieries and formed another company named bharat coking coal limited (hereinafter referred to as bccl) which is wholly owned as a subsidiary of coal limited and the gopalichuck colliery was transferred to the said new company. the petitioner is in administrative control ..... the petitioner. but the major penalties that is: compulsory retirement; removal from service; and dismissal can be imposed by the chairman managing director of coal india limited only.12. it was contended that the disciplinary authority who is not competent to pass major penalty cannot initiate any inquiry for a major .....

Kulbir Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1989MP279; 1988MPLJ301

..... is a distributive process for the good of the community within the meaning of article 39(b). in sanjeev coke mfg. 'co. v. m/s. bharat coking coal ltd. air 1983 sc 239 it was held that nationalisation of coal mines in whole or in part is a law for implementation of article 39(b). the supreme court in state of tamil ..... base had been eroded many times over and the companies could be restarted with unencumbered assets only after total elimination of the external liabilities through a process of nationalisation. the provisions of the act do not offend article 21 nor they are in contravention of articles 300a or 301. prioity has to be given regarding payment ..... of commerce, bombay. the suit was allowed and the matter was referred to the named arbitrator on 4-5-1979. thereafter hind cycles limited and sen-raleigh limited (nationalisation) ordinance, 1980 was promulgated on 25-10-1980 which was subsequently made act no. 70/1980 -- by notification dt. 28-10-1980 the central government transferred the .....

M/S Madhya Pradesh Power Generating Company Limited and Others Vs. M/S ...

Court : Competition Commission of India CCI

..... product market in the present matter. in this regard, the dg noted that considering the physical characteristics and the use of non-coking coal, there is no substitute of the non-coking coal available for the thermal power plants and sponge iron manufacturers in india. therefore, the relevant product market for the purpose of investigation ..... pradesh state government at the time of the nationalization. 69. thus, it is evident that in view of the provisions of the coal mines (nationalization) act, 1973, production and distribution of coal is in the hands of the central government. as a result, cil and its subsidiary companies have been vested with monopolistic power ..... process provides that, where a customer is not satisfied with the quality of coal being supplied through a particular coal mine and is not satisfied with the declared grade, it may institute a statutory complaint requesting the cco to assess the grade of coal being supplied. in fact, the commission has, in its order dated 09 .....