Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: coking coal mines nationalisation act 1972 section 1 short title and commencement Court: kerala Page 1 of about 33 results (0.115 seconds)

K.S.R.T.C. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Kerala

Reported in : 2010(1)KLT65

..... 1983 sc 239:shri ashok sen drew pointed attention to the earlier affidavits filed on behalf of bharat coking coal company and commented severally on the alleged contradictory reasons given therein for the exclusion of certain coke oven plants from the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act. but, in the ultimate analysis, we are not really to concern ourselves with the hollowness or the self-condemnatory nature of .....

Planters Forum Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

..... ownership of the resources must vest in the community i.e. the state. a legislation such as the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act may be a legislation for the acquisition by the state of coking coal mines and coke oven plants belonging to private parties but it is not a legislation towards securing that the ownership and ..... it means and includes all resources, natural and man-made, public and private-owned.22. in view of the foregoing discussion, we hold that the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972 is a legislation for giving effect to the policy of the state towards securing the principle specified in article 39(b) of the ..... shri ashoke sen drew pointed attention to the earlier affidavits filed on behalf of bharat coking coal limited and commented severely on the alleged contradictory reasons given therein for the exclusion of certain coke oven plants from the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act. but, in the ultimate analysis, we are not really to concern ourselves with .....

Excel Glasses Ltd. and ors. Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Reported in : (1992)IILLJ330Ker

..... though some observations were made, which could only be treated as obiter, that judgment itself shows that what came up for consideration therein was only whether the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, enacted under article 39(b), was immune under article 31c from attack on ground of violation of articles 14 or 19,7. a division bench ..... and what came up for consideration in that case was only the correctness of a division bench decision in bharat coking coal ltd. v. p.k. agarwala 1979(3) scc 609 holding that term 'coking coal mine' does not include a coke oven plant and whether the act challenged therein was saved by article 39(b) or not. according to them, ..... 1983-sc-239 (supra). that was the view taken in the decision in bapuji educational association v. state (air) 1986 karnalaka 119 (supra) also. 8. sanjeev coke's case (supra) could not and did not overrule minerva mills case(supra). a constitution bench of five judges cannot overrule another decision of a constitution bench of the .....

State of Kerala, Rep. by the Chief Secre Vs. Hotel Leelaventure Ltd. a ...

Court : Kerala

..... down in paragraph 25:"5. shri ashok sen drew pointed attention to the earlier affidavits filed on behalf of bharat coking coal company and commented severally on the alleged contradictory reasons given therein for the exclusion of certain coke oven plants from the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act. but, in the w.a. no. 250 of 2011 -:98. :- ultimate analysis, we are not really to concern ourselves .....

V.N. Narayanan Nair and ors. Vs. State of Kerala and ors.

Court : Kerala

Reported in : AIR1971Ker98

..... being an agricultural operation, the conferment of such rights on a varamdar although he be a cultivator, cannot be regarded as a measure of agrarian reform. it is as if mining rights were conferred on him. therefore, this provision cannot have the protection of article 31-a and no attempt having been made to justify the deprivation of the landlord of .....

R.K.V. Motors and Timbers (P) Ltd. and ors. Vs. Regional Transport Off ...

Court : Kerala

Reported in : AIR1982Ker156

..... provision as to notice is directory only, and is not a condition precedent : le feuvre v. miller, (1857) 8 e & b 321.' it was not a case where the coal mines order had not been published by the government. the following passage occurring at page 676 of the report will make the position dear :'the justices were of opinion as to ..... of the order by the agent of the colliery to the appellant was also sufficient evidence of such notice having been given within the meaning of section 6 of the coal mines regulation act, 1896.' it is thus evident that a statutory order had been printed by the queen's printer. such publication of the order by the queen's ..... of 1939) shall be paid by crossed demand drafts drawn in favour of the secretary, state transport authority, kerala, trivandrum and payable at tri-vandrum from any one of the nationalised banks. rule. 10. exemption from tax (section 5 (1)) : (1) the previous intimation referred to in sub-section (1) of section 5 shall be made to the regional .....

Regional Director, Esi Corporation Vs. G. Sivaprasad, Proprietor, M.S. ...

Court : Kerala

Reported in : (2010)ILLJ279Ker

..... insurance act, 1948 centralwhich a manufacturing process is act (34 of 1948)being carried on with the aid ofpower or is ordinarily so carriedon but excluding a mine, subjectto the operation of the mines act1952 (central act 35 of 1952) or arailway running shed or anestablishment which is exclusivelyspecified in clause (12) ofsection 2 of the employees' stateinsurance act ..... of which a manufacturing process is being carried on without the aid or power or is ordinarily so carried on,but does not include a mine subject to the operation of the mines act, 1952 (35 of 1952) or a railway running shed;the above definition shows that in the case of a premises where manufacturing process ..... the aid of power, or is the areas where the scheme hasordinarily so carried on; but already been extended with effectexcluding a mine subject to the from the midnight of march 29,operation of the mines act, 1952 1975 vide notification no.(central act 35 of 1952), or a 2287/e2/73/lbr dated march 22,railway running .....

S. Sankarappa Gounder Vs. K.C. Gopalan and ors.

Court : Kerala

Reported in : AIR1973Ker149

..... a-ll dated 15-6-1951 is a lease to the 31st defendant in respect of 600 acres of private forests. ext. b-36 dated 5-5-1956 is a mining lease to the 32nd defendant, a son of the first defendant. it was agreed before us that in pursuance to ext. b-36. no ..... mining operations were done in the nroncrty comprised therein and that the 32nd defendant is not claiming any rights over the property comprised in ext. b-36. in view of this .....

P.V. Mani and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Kerala

Reported in : AIR1986Ker86

..... as the corporation) was constituted under the life insurance corporation act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as the act). the life insurance business ofabout 243 companies was nationalised with effect from 1-9-1956 under the above enactment, which replaced its predecessor ordinance. chapter iv of the act consists of sections 7 - 17, which ..... for the purpose of effectuating the transfer and integration of employees and standardisation of theconditions of their services.13. a similar provision of the general insurance business (nationalisation) act, 57 of 1972, was considered by the supreme court in the decision reported in ajay kumar banerjee v. union of india air 1984 sc ..... notified on 30th september, 1980 in purported exercise of the power of the central government under section 16(1)(g) of the general insurance business (nationalisation) act. that scheme was challenged as beyond the competence of the central government, since the merger of the insurance companies into four companies in aid .....

Nature Lovers Movement Vs. State of Kerala and ors.

Court : Kerala

Reported in : AIR2000Ker131

..... and it operates only prospectively. generally speaking, 'a rule and law of parliament that regularly, nova constitutio futuris formam imponere debet, non praeteritis, as lord coke said. this rule, which is in effect that enactments in a statute are generally to be construed to be prospective, and intended to regulate the future ..... committee under the earlier supreme court order have been rightly rejected or not by the committee and whether under those schemes, the mine lessees can be allowed to carry on mining operations without in any way adversely affecting environment or ecological balance or causing hazard to individuals, cattie and agricultural lands. the ..... committee under the earlier supreme court order have been rightly rejected or not by the committee and whether under those schemes, the mine lessees can be allowed to carry on mining operations without in any way adversely affecting environment or ecological balance or causing hazard to individuals, cattle and agricultural lands. the .....