Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: coking coal mines nationalisation act 1972 section 1 short title and commencement Page 11 of about 1,600 results (0.185 seconds)

National Textile Corpn. (South Maharashtra) Ltd. Vs. Bhagirathi Gopal ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : [1991(62)FLR601]; (1992)IILLJ111Bom

..... central government or the custodian in view of section 3(7) of the taking over act. it may be true that unlike section 9(2) of the coking coal mines nationalisation act (act no. 36 of 1972), section 3 (7) of the act does not specifically exclude liability in respect of gratuity or pension. however, that fact ..... the liability to make payment of gratuity, it is necessary to refer to the provision itself. the provision reads thus :'(f) 'employer' means, in relation to any establishment, factory, mine, oilfield, plantation, port, railway company or shop - (i) ...... (ii) ..... (iii) in any other case, the person, who, or the authority which, has the ..... ultimate control over the affairs of the establishment, factory, mine, oilfield, plantation, port, railway company or shop, and where the said affairs are entrusted to any other person, whether called a manager, on managing director or by any other .....

Bera Colliery Company Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ...

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : [2003(2)JCR749(Jhr)]

..... to the contrary- (a) every amount paid to the owner of every coking coal mine or group of coking coal mines under section 10, or of every coke oven plant under section 11, of the coking coal act, or to the owner of every coal mine or group of coal mines under section 3 of the coal mines act (hereinafter in either case referred to as the owner), shall be ..... 14 of the constitution of india. the act, which came into force on 23.12.1986, amended both the coking coal mines (nationalization) act, 1972 and the coal mines (nationalization) act. 1973. we are concerned here with the amendment to coal mines (nationalization) act, 1973 which came into force on 1.5.1973. it is not necessary to go into the ..... on the date immediately before the appointed day as if the provisions of section 10 or section 11 of the coking coal act or, as the case may be section 3 of the coking coal mines act, as amended by this act had been in force at all material times, and no such payment shall be called in question .....

Turner Morrison Limited Vs. Bharat Coking Coal Ltd.

Court : Kolkata

..... act, the defendant discovered certain materials and documents to show that by operation of law the said premises has vested by operation of the provisions of the coking coal mines nationalization act, 1972. the property has vested in the defendant and in obligation to pay view any thereof, rent and the defendant occupation has charges. no ..... time was with allahabad bank who was a tenant in respect of the suit premises. accordingly the contention of the defendant that at the time when the coking coal mines nationalization act, 1972 came into force, lodna colliery was owner of the property in question is not only absurd but contrary to record. in support of ..... , the reliance was placed on a schedule to the coaking coal mines nationalization act, 1972 in order to sustain a plea of ownership in respect of the suit premises. mr.dutta has referred to a decision of the hon ble supreme court in bharat coking coal limited versus madanlal agarwal reported at air1997supreme court 1599 and contended .....

Maharaval Lakshmansingh Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : [1986]160ITR103(Raj)

..... , vol. viii, the word 'occupation' has been stated to mean actual holding or possession, esp. of a place or of land. 13. the words 'owner' and 'occupier', as used in coking coal mines (nationalisation) act (no. xxxvi of 1972), came up for consideration before their lordships of the supreme court in industrial supplies pvt. ltd. v. union of india : [1981]1scr375 , and it was .....

Pushpa Verma and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Representing Ministry o ...

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : AIR2008Jhar54; [2008(1)JCR317(Jhr)]

..... to the plaintiff, large number of claims were made by hundreds of ex-colliery-owners under the provisions of the cocking coal mines (nationalization) act, 1972 before the commissioner of payments appointed under the cocking coal mines (nationalization) act, 1972. he appeared and worked for the respondents in those cases to safeguard the interest of the union ..... at patna (civil) if the payments are made without delay. dw-1 has also proved ext. a/5, a letter of the director, department of coal to coal controller for rejecting the plaintiffs bill to legal remembrancer. ext. 6 is a letter of the superintendent and remembrancer of legal affairs, government of bihar, ..... department to furnish any further clarification. ext. a/10 is the letter of the law department, government of bihar addressed to the assistant coal superintendent, office of the coal controller, calcutta conveying that the earlier bills of the plaintiff were passed in accordance with the rules.20. all the said documents have been .....

Central Coal Fields Ltd. Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : [2003(1)JCR304(Jhr)]

..... cess and royalty for the minerals fire-clay extracted in course of mining activities.2. the petitioner's case is that the central coal field limited is a government company and carrying on mining activities in the coal mines area having been nationalized under the cooking coal mines nationalization act, 1972 and coal mines nationalization act, 1973. the coal mines were acquired under the aforesaid act and all rights and obligations ..... by such person without any lawful authority.6. an noticed above the petitioner is a deemed lessee in respect of the coal mines and it has full authority to extract coal from the mines. in exercise of power conferred by section 30 of the mines and mineral (regulation and development) act, 1957 the central government framed rules known as mineral concession rules, 1960. section 27 .....

Sadhvendra Singh Alias Sadho Singh Vs. Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. and Ors

Court : Jharkhand

..... the custodian did not take possession of schedule 'a' & 'b' lands as they are not belonging to any coal mine. their possession was never questioned, disputed or obstructed. thereafter on enactment of coking coal mines (nationalization) act, 1972, dobari colliery was listed at serial no. 152 and compensation has been awarded to the ..... owners by the central government. under the said act, management of all other coal mines were taken over by the central government. it ..... . p. (c) no. 4727 of 2010 sadhvendra singh @ sadho singh ..... petitioner vs. 1. bharat coking coal ltd. district dhanbad 2. the project officer, rocp/south jharia kustore area no. iii, kustore area, bharat coking coal ltd., district dhanbad 3. estate officer, koyala bhawan, koyala nagar, district dhanbad ...principal defendants/respondents 4. .....

Kamla Shankar Dubey Vs. M/S Bharat Coking Coal Ltd and O

Court : Jharkhand

..... place in the history of litigation between m/s sanjeev hard coke manufacturing company and m/s bccl. while several other coking coal mines and coke oven plants were taken over by virtue of the provisions of coking coal mines (nationalization) act 1972, m/s sanjeev hard coke manufacturing company strongly resisted the process of taking over and vesting ..... decided by the constitution bench of the hon'ble supreme court vide judgement dated 10.12.1982 reported in 1983 (1) scc147[sanjeev coke manufacturing company versus m/s bharat coking coal limited and another] 5. as a matter of fact, even after the judgment rendered by the apex court on 10.12.1982 ..... l.p.a. no. 76 of 2009 --- kamla shankar dubey --- ---- appellant versus 1. m/s bharat coking coal limited through the general manager, dhanbad 2. the general manager, m/s bharat coking coal limited, dhanbad 3. sanjeev hard coke manufacturing company, dhanbad --- respondents --- coram:the hon ble mr. justice aparesh kumar singh the hon'ble mr. .....

Bharat Coking Coal Limited Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Patna

..... to revise the rent payable by the plaintiff. their lordships considering the different provisions of the bihar lands reforms act, coking coal mines nationalization act, 1972, mines and minerals (regulation and development) act, 1957 and the mineral concession rules, 1960 held that a mining lessee has to pay surface rent in terms of the provisions of rule 27(1) (d) of the mineral ..... required to be complied with by the petitioner prior to registration of sale-deed.2. the petitioner, m/s. bharat coking coal ltd. (shortly b.c.c.l.) is a government company primarily engaged in the activities of raising cooking coal which is used in steel plants, thermal. power stations and other industries. for the purpose of its activities, the petitioner ..... m.y. eqbal, j.1. in this writ application, the petitioner, m/s. bharat coking coal ltd., has prayed for issuance of appropriate writ in the nature of certiorari or any other appropriate, writ for quashing the direction of respondent no, 2, deputy commissioner .....

Punjab National Bank Vs. Central Kirkand Coal Co. Ltd. and Bharat Mini ...

Court : Patna

..... , there were controversial judgments by this court. the colliery owners had raised the question in such suits to the effect that in view of the provisions of cooking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1.972, the jurisdiction of the civil court to entertain the claims of the creditors and others is barred and such claim can only be raised before ..... realisation of rs. 2,28,488.40p. along with interest etc. similarly, the same plaintiff-petitioner, punjab national bank filed title suit no. 51 of 1974 against bharat mining corporation ltd. and others for realisation of rs. 16,41,743.65p, along with other reliefs.3. both these cases are pending in the court of sub judge ..... considered the correctness of the decisions cited before us, and we have only held that the learned single judge while rendering the decision in m/s, bharat cooking coal limited had wrongly ignored the law as laid down in a binding precedent. since these appeals are pending for sometime, we have no doubt that the bench hearing .....