Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: coast guard act 1978 section 27 losing ship or aircraft Court: mumbai Page 11 of about 328 results (0.354 seconds)

Tonira Pharma Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

..... retrospective effect and, therefore they could not affect the operation of the earlier notifications dated may 23, 1977, until they came into force on january 1, 1978. further, both section 3b and section 5(1) in express terms confer power upon the state government to issue notification "from time to time". section 3b ..... anti-dumping duty cannot be part of the value for levy of sad. k.11 the above budget circular expressly clarifies that the amendment made in finance act, 2003 is purely clarificatory/declaratory/explanatory or otherwise obvious/applicable legal position. hence, the amendment would apply for past period also right from 1998 when section ..... not be taken into account. this amendment will effect from 1-3-2002. k.10 the above budget circular expressly clarifies that the amendment made in finance act, 2003 is purely clarificatory/declaratory/explanatory or otherwise obvious/applicable legal position. hence, the amendment would apply for past period also right from 1998 when section .....

Citizen Forum Through Its Secretary Shri Rajiv S/O Gajanan Jagtap, Vs. ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (2008)110BOMLR598; 2008LC(BOM)309

..... contentions, reliance is placed on the judgment of the supreme court in the state of karnataka and anr. v. shri ranganatha reddy and anr. : [1978]1scr641 .17. learned counsel shri gordey further argued that following factors would demonstrate that decision of respondent nos. 2 and 3 to appoint respondent no. ..... of distribution through panchayats, users associations, cooperatives or franchisees would be permitted.learned counsel shri gordey submitted that seventh proviso of section 14 of the act of 2003 does not authorise respondent nos. 1 to 3 to appoint distribution franchisee. it was contended that maharashtra electricity regulatory commission has also ..... done by the state government. to address this issue and to provide for distancing of government from determination of tariffs, the electricity regulatory commissions act was enacted in 1998. it created the central electricity regulatory commission and had an enabling provision through which the state government could create a state .....

Sou. Ramkuvar Madanlal Atale Vs. Madanlal Surajkaran Atale

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1977)79BOMLR143

..... that they agree that the ground exists. indeed if the parties were to say that they 'admit' the existence of some ground the court would be at once on guard to enquire and investigate whether there is collusion between the parties.69. apart from interlocutory reliefs, it is obvious that there is no provision for divorce or for that matter ..... following manner:it has been said that it is very difficult to give a concise, and yet sufficiently comprehensive definition of a nullity. in law it means a void act or an act having no legal force or validity; invalid; null; that which is morally impossible. it is such a defect as renders the proceedings in which it occurs totally null ..... 10, or in clause (i) of sub-section (1) of section 13, the petitioner has not in any manner been accessory to or connived at or condoned the act or acts complained of, or where the ground of the petition is cruelty the petitioner has not in any manner condoned the cruelty, and(c) the petition is not presented or .....

Red Carpet Films Ltd. a Public Limited Company Incorporated Under the ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2009(5)BomCR167; 2009(111)BomLR2422

..... agreement.'38. the above principles are applicable to the facts and circumstances of the present case.39. therefore, the court, under section 9 of the act, has ample power and jurisdiction to issue injunction or pass such interim orders/measures as prayed basically to avoid further complication and to avoid multiplicity of ..... impose any sole arbitrator to decide/resolve their disputes unilaterally, in such fashion. admittedly, the petitioners have already filed an application under section 11 of the act for appointment of sole arbitrator and the same is pending.22. in view of above, therefore, though the representation/complaint was filed by the respondents to ..... the consent of the parties, based upon the material available on the record.2. the petitioners have invoked section 9 of the arbitration & conciliation act, 1996 (for short, 'the act') as dispute arose between the parties in the matter of an arbitration agreement dated 7th november, 2007.3. the petitioners - a public limited company .....

Prakash Jayawant Koli Vs. State of Maharashtra Through Secretary, Indu ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2007(6)ALLMR198; 2008(1)BomCR196; (2007)109BOMLR2140; (2008)IILLJ917Bom; 2008(2)MhLj511

..... misuse this valuable right by obtaining ex parte orders by suppression, misrepresentation or misstatement of facts.7. in udai chand v. shankar lal and ors. : [1978]2scr809 , the court revoked the special leave petition and vacated the stay order. the court, while following the ratio of the aforementioned cases, observed that ..... order 1950, it was reiterated. a slight modification was made in that behalf by the presidential notification dated october 29, 1956. in 1976 amendment act, there is no substantial change except removing the area restriction. thus mahadeo koli, a scheduled tribe continued to be a scheduled tribe even after independence ..... , scheduled tribes denotified tribes (vimukta jaties) nomadic tribes, other backward classes and special backward category (regulation of issuance and verification of) caste certificate act, 2000 and the rules framed thereunder.3. by letter dated 8th may 2007 the services of the petitioner were terminated by the respondents with immediate effect .....

Abbott Laboratories (i) Ltd. (Now known as Pfizer Ltd.) and Others Vs. ...

Court : Mumbai

..... dispute relating to entitlement is not incidental to the benefit claimed and is, therefore, clearly outside the scope of a proceeding under section 33-c(2) of the act. the labour court has no jurisdiction to first decide the workmens entitlement and then proceed to compute the benefit so adjudicated. it is only when the entitlement has ..... judicious manner. therefore, the appropriate forum wherein such question of back wages could be decided is only in a proceeding to whom a reference under section 10 of the act is made. to state that merely upon reinstatement, a workman would be entitled, under the terms of award, to all his arrears of pay and allowances would be ..... march 1988 and (ii) reference (it) no. 54 of 1995 in respect of general charter of demands. the application under section 33c(2) of the i.d. act was filed by the applicants by invoking the provisions of the aforesaid settlement dated 23-01-1996 signed by the company and the recognized union (hereinafter referred to as settlement .....

Sneh Kohli Vs. The Universal English Trust, through the Managing Trust ...

Court : Mumbai

..... presiding officer, school tribunal, mumbai dismissing the appeal filed by the petitioner under section 9 of the maharashtra employees of private schools (condition of service) regulation act, 1977. some of the relevant facts for the purpose of deciding this petition are as under:- 2. it was the case of the petitioner that the ..... employee would be deemed to be on probation within the meaning of section 5(2) of the maharashtra employees of private schools (conditions of service) regulation act, 1977 on the ground that the appointment was made in a clear and permanent vacancy, notwithstanding the fact that the letter of appointment specifically stipulated that the ..... appointment for two consecutive years on temporary basis, it would not amount to permanent appointment treating him probationary as contemplated under section 5(2) of the meps act. 63. the supreme court in case of kalpataru vidya samasthe (supra) has held that if an employee has accepted the terms and conditions recorded in the .....

Asoka Spintex Ltd., R.M. Gohel, Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in : (2004)(171)ELT59Tri(Mum.)bai

..... that happens to be the core issue.9. the demand for duty in this case is beyond the normal period of limitation under section 11a(i) of the central excise act, 1944. the allegation raised in the show cause notice for invoking the extended period of limitation against the assessee is that he suppressed/mis-declared facts with intent to evade ..... to 24. 7.95. during this period the appellant was known as m/s.asoka mills ltd. having a separate entity of its own. it was registered under central excise act in that name. during this period the raw materials were supplied by m/s. arvind mills ltd. for manufacturing yarn on job work basis. the appellant was collecting job charges .....

Shree Yamuna Mills Co. Ltd. Vs. Majoor Mahajan Mandal and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1958Bom74; (1957)59BOMLR1046; ILR1958Bom76; (1957)ILLJ620Bom

..... are in respect of the dispute bound by a registered agreement, settlement, submission or award.' by virtue of section 114(1), which is a provision of the act, the parties are bound by a registered agreement, settlement or award and, therefore, no conciliation proceeding in respect of any matter determined by such agreement, settlement ..... registered agreement, settlement or award shall cease to have effect. the immediate consequence of its ceasing to have effect, so far as the specific provisions of the act are concerned, at once becomes apparent. in the first instance, the bar to conciliation proceedings which existed by reason of a registered agreement, settlement or award ..... and that regulated the relations between the employer and the employees prior to toe registered agreement, settlement or award' taking effect under the provisions of the act. then we come to the next possibility: is only so much of the award preserved as relates to the rights already enjoyed by the employees before .....

Chandrakanth Shridhar Deshpande Vs. Govt. of Maharashtra and Another

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 1990(1)BomCR17; (1991)IILLJ1Bom

..... his very livelihood. any adverse verdict against him was bound to be disastrous to him as it had provided to be. in such a situation he cannot be expected to act calmly and with deliberation. that is why rule 15(5) has provided for representation of a government servant charged with dereliction of duty or with contravention of the rule by .....