Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: coast guard act 1978 section 27 losing ship or aircraft Court: mumbai Page 33 of about 328 results (0.095 seconds)

Jun 24 2016 (HC)

Buwaji Sahadeo Hazare Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

..... of discipline and those proceedings are not judicial proceedings. the contention that on account of the punishment having been imposed under section 48-a of the prisons act, the respondents would not be entitled to deny the furlough or parole leave by taking resort to the provisions of law comprised under rule 4(10) of ..... with different aspects i.e. one under the army act and another under the service law i.e. central civil services (cca) rules under which disciplinary action was taken and therefore, the concurrent proceedings under the two ..... scc 414. that was a case where the delinquent was found guilty and sentenced by the general court martial to r.i. for 6 months under army act. the disciplinary authorities had punished him by dismissing him from service under the rules for his misconduct. it was held that court martial proceedings and disciplinary proceedings deal .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 11 2016 (HC)

Pratibha Niketan Education Society, Nanded, Through its General Secret ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

..... caste, scheduled tribe, denotified tribes (vimukta jatis), nomadic tribes, other backward classes and special backward category (regulation of issuance and verification of) caste certificate act, 2000 (mah.act 23 of 2001), the management called upon the employee by letter dated 25/01/2005 to submit his tribe validity. similar such reminders were issued to the ..... of the parties. 2. the question/issue that has been raised in this petition is with regard to the distinction between a fraud / nebulous act and innocuous act. the said issue has been canvassed by the petitioners and the respondents in the light of the following judgments of the hon'ble supreme court and ..... the tribunal and the learned single judge and also the division bench of the high court have committed a serious error in accepting the said report and acted on it and thereby ordering the reinstatement with back wages. since the reinstatement and back wages now ordered are quite contrary to the mandatory provisions of rule .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 21 1977 (HC)

Jaikumar Chhaganlal Patni and Ors. Vs. Mary Jerome D'souza and Ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1978Bom239; (1978)80BOMLR95; 1978MhLJ164

..... . claims for such compensation in india, as discussed earlier, are still determined mainly by reference to principles underlying the fatal accidentsact, 1855, analogous to english act of 1846; and the decided cases thereunder prior to 1908 enactments, contemplate reducing the amount of compensation by such insurance amounts, if received by the dependants. ..... .i.t, ins. co. : air1971sc1624 , arising directly under the said section 110b of the motor vehicles act, and merely observed that, that section 110b is wider in scope, without indicating the extent of such width. the supreme court, however, hag still reiterated the ..... on whether 'just' compensation conceived under section 110f, requires application of any different principle by the claims tribunal from the one implicit in the fatal accidents act and evolved in english and indian cases decided thereunder. the supreme court has adverted to this in the case of sheikhupura transport co. ltd. v. n .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 08 1967 (HC)

Santeline Fernandes (Through Margarida Gomes) Vs. Mackinnon Mackenzie ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1968)IILLJ189Bom; 1968MhLJ292

..... drug or has disobeyed wilfully an express order or an express rule for the purpose of securing safety of workmen or has wilfully removed or disregarded any safety-guard or other device which he knew to have been provided for the purpose of safety of workmen. except in these limited cases, in all other cases of ..... accident, the workman is entitled to compensation. section 306 of the succession act, therefore, has no application in the present case. 19. my attention has been invited to halsbury's laws of england, 2nd edn., vol. 34, p. 896, ..... his estate, in the absence of any provision to the contrary.' 11. similarly, in corpus juris secundum, vol. 100, para. 417, it is said : 'unless the compensation act provides otherwise, the general rules governing the abatement of actions apply in actions for compensation,' and under the heading, 'death of employee,' it is said : 'under some statutes it .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 08 1967 (HC)

Margarida Gomes and anr. Vs. Mackinnor Mackenzie and Co. Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1968Bom328; (1968)70BOMLR62

..... drug or has disobeyed willfully an express order or an express rule for the purpose of securing safety of workmen or has willfully removed or disregarded any safety guard or other device which he knew to have been provided for the purpose of safety of workmen. except in these limited cases, in all other cases of ..... of his estate, in the absence of any provision to the contrary' similarly in corpus juris secundum, vol. 100, para 417, it is said: 'unless the compensation act provides otherwise, the general rules governing the abatement or actions apply in actions for compensation', and under the heading. 'death of employee', it is said: 'under some statutes ..... observations have been made in the earlier case in darlington v. roscoe and sons. (1907) 1kb 219. in a similar case under the present workmen's compensation act, following the decision in 1907 1 kb 219 the andhra pradesh high court in radhakrishna rice mill pendalapaka v. gangalagurti appalacharyulu, 1958 i llj 746 held that the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 09 1995 (HC)

State of Maharashtra Vs. Suresh N. Vaidya and Others

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 1996CriLJ1113

..... the question was whether the assaulting is done by the police officer in the discharge of his official duties. the learned single judge of this court held that the act of assault by a police officer cannot be brought within the meaning of doing something in the discharge of his official duties, and therefore, it cannot be said ..... .i. officers disclosed their identity to the accused and informed their purpose of visit, but still the manhandling and assault continued. by any stretch of imagination the alleged act of the accused, if proved, cannot be brought within the meaning of words 'anything done or intended to be done under the powers conferred by or in pursuance of ..... the course of the struggle they have manhandled or caused some hurt to those persons, it will come squarely within the meaning of section 20(3) of the act and the prosecution is bad without prior notice to the respondents as provided thereunder. the argument is no doubt attractive but on deeper scrutiny i find that the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 02 2001 (HC)

Hindustan Aeronautics Limited Vs. Nashik Workers Union and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2001(3)ALLMR586; 2001(4)BomCR205; (2001)3BOMLR459; [2001(90)FLR624]

..... of the public sector undertakings and their subsidiaries. corporations and autonomous bodies as listed in the notification to make a reference under the industrial disputes act in respect of those central public sector undertakings and their subsidiaries. corporations and autonomous bodies so listed. the said notification has been issued after ..... considering that definition, would it be possible for this court to drew the same inference insofar as appropriate government is concerned under the industrial disputes act. two things prevent the court from considering that aspect. firstly the matter itself in air india statutory corporation, etc. (supra) has been referred ..... air india statutory corporation, etc. (supra) what was in issue was the notification issued under section 10 of the labour contract (regulation and abolition) act, 1970 to abolish contract labour in various offices. therefore, the apex court was considering the definition of the appropriate government in respect of the issuance .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 26 2005 (HC)

Shailendra Kumar Sengupta Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2006(2)MhLj29

..... 197(1) before taking cognizance of offence can be raised at any stage of the proceedings.17. it may be seen that in the present case the acts complained by the complainant against the accused persons have a reasonable nexus with the official duties of the accused persons. hence, they are entitled to protection from ..... they protected accused no. 1 by not taking action against him. shri dewani submitted that this was also done by accused nos. 2 and 3 while acting or purporting to act in the discharge of their official duties. as such previous sanction of the central government under section 197 of the code of criminal procedure is necessary. ..... the case is committed by the magistrate, the special court cannot take cognizance of the offence punishable under the scheduled castes and the scheduled tribes (prevention of atrocities) act, 1989. thus there is no illegality in the action of the learned magistrate in issuing summons to the accused persons. hence the ground put-forth by the accused .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 12 2015 (HC)

Janaki Ultra Sound Center Vs. The Appropriate Authority and Others

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

..... of non-completion of search and seizure operation, the appropriate authority or the officer authorized in this behalf may make arrangement, by way of mounting a guard or sealing of the premises of the genetic counselling centre, genetic laboratory, genetic clinic ultra- sound clinic or imaging centre, for safe keeping, listing and ..... object found therein and seal and seize the same if there is reason to believe that it may furnish evidence of commission of an offence punishable under the act. explanation:- in these rules- 1. genetic laboratory/genetic clinic/genetic counselling centre would include an ultra- sound centre/ imaging centre / nursing home / hospital ..... seizure to the concerned magistrate immediately after sealling. the seizure and sealing of the sonography machine is therefore stated to be an illegal and unsustainable act. 11. the petitioner submits that there are no allegations leveled against the petitioner that the said sonography machine or the petitioner's centre was .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 25 2015 (HC)

Vivekanand Rugnalaya, Latur through its Administrative Officer, Latur ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

..... . 20. notwithstanding the legal position as above, the industrial court was expected to consider the peculiar facts of this case in as much as scrutinize the act of the respondent in contributing to the 'gangajali' under the settlement for 4 years and drawing all benefits. it was established by conduct of the respondent ..... aside. 9. mr.natu, learned advocate vehemently submits that the order of punishment has been inflicted upon the respondent strictly as per the model standing orders act. minor misconducts and major misconducts are defined under the model standing orders. punishments for minor misconducts as well as major misconducts is also provided. a ..... a 'sweeper ? was inflicted with a punishment of suspension for 3 days without salary under the model standing orders framed under the industrial employment (standing orders) act, 1946. this order of punishment, which was passed after hearing the respondent, has been set aside by the industrial court. 6. the petitioner further submits that .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //