Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: coast guard act 1978 section 27 losing ship or aircraft Court: mumbai Page 1 of about 328 results (0.122 seconds)

Feb 24 2003 (HC)

Maharashtra State Electricity Board Vs. Maharashtra Electricity Regula ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR2003Bom398; 2003(5)BomCR206; 2003(3)MhLj84

..... legislature as well as the supreme court of india. he referred to the decision in hyderabad vanaspati ltd. v. andhra pradesh state electricity board, air 1978 sc 1715, where the supreme court has held, inter alia, that terms and conditions of supply are akin to subordinate legislation and are statutory in character ..... jurisdiction to decide the questions relating to the terms and conditions of supply. 10. we are unable to accept the submissions of mr. diwan. erc act confers exclusive jurisdiction on the state regulatory commission to determine the tariff for electricity. section 22(1) requires the commission to determine the tariff for electricity ..... supply are conducted on commercial principles; (g) national power plans formulated by the central government. (3) the state commission, while determining the tariff under this act, shall not show undue preference to any consumer of electricity, but may differentiate according to the consumer's load factor, power factor, total consumption of energy .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 02 1982 (HC)

Tradesvel Security Services Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1982)84BOMLR608

..... be imposed. the purpose is to meet the costs of operating the scheme and to provide different benefits, facilities and amenities to the registered security guards as stated in the act and the scheme. so long as the amount so levied is expended on the said purposes and for no other, and so long further the ..... of article 14. the classification is not arbitrary. the legislature has made uniform laws for all contractors.103. the next decision in pathuman v. state of kerala : [1978]2scr537 , makes a review of all the earlier decisions on the point and summarises the guidelines to determine the question of reasonableness of restriction. the guidelines are:(1) ..... arbitrariness and mala fide exercise of power are vocative of the said article.78. the next decision is reported in smt. maneka gandhi v. union of india : [1978]2scr621 . in paragraph 56 of this decision, the requirements of article 14 of the constitution as detailed in the earlier decisions have been recapitulated. the substance of these .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 11 2002 (HC)

Head Mistress (Ms. P. D'Souza), Fatimadevi English High School and 2 O ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (2003)ILLJ619Bom

..... . i, therefore, do not find any substance in these petitions. the appellate authority has rightly come to the conclusion that the payment of gratuity act is applicable to the educational institution of the petitioners' establishment. i do not find any illegality and infirmity in the said judgment and order of ..... of any legal practitioner, architect, engineer, accountant, tax consultant or any other technical or professional consultant and also includes) a society registered under the societies registration act, 1866 (xxi of 1866), and a charitable or other trust, whether registered or not, which carries on (whether for purposes of gain or not) any ..... the controlling authority, and therefore, they approached the appellate authority contending that they were entitled to get gratuity in accordance with the payment of gratuity act, 1972 which would prevail upon the circular issued by the bombay municipal corporation for entitlement and computation of the amount of gratuity. the appellate authority .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 04 2008 (HC)

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Koodathil Kallyatan Ambujakshan

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (2008)219CTR(Bom)80; [2009]309ITR113(Bom)

..... as follows:logic alone will not be determinative of a controversy arising from a taxing statute. equally, common sense is a stranger and an incompatible partner to the it act. it does not concern itself with the principles of morality or ethics. it is concerned with the very limited question as to whether the amount brought to tax ..... already answered the issue and that finding of fact is not in issue before us. even otherwise considering that the rbi is a statutory body created under an act there is no other company or concern belonging to the same management. the fifth requirement has also been satisfied. the sixth requirement has also been satisfied as in ..... or receivable by an employee of-(i) a public sector company; or(ii) any other company; or(iii) an authority established under a central, state or provincial act; or....on his voluntary retirement or termination of his service, in accordance with any scheme or schemes of voluntary retirement or in the case of a public sector company .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 28 2003 (HC)

Hi-tech Engineers Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2004(1)BomCR776

..... september, 2002 (exhibit 'u' to the petition) the coast guard head quarters, new delhi has clarified that the indian coast guard is not a part of indian navy and that the coast guard is an armed force of the union, under the ministry of defence, and is governed by the coast guard act, 1978.7. mr. nankani, however, strongly urged that on ..... realising the mistake committed by the petitioners in obtaining clearance of the goods under section 90 of the customs act on the basis of misdeclaration in the shipping bills, they have approached the ..... be paid extra on the petitioners furnishing a certificate that the sales tax charges has not been exempted under the sales tax act. the supply order further reserved the right of the coast guard to reject the barges which are offered by the petitioners for inspection. all these conditions set out in the supply order .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 28 2003 (HC)

Hi-tech Engineers Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2003(161)ELT96(Bom)

..... , 2002 (exhibit - 'u' to the petition) the coast guard head quarters, new delhi has clarified that the indian coast guard is not a part of indian navy and that the coast guard is an armed force of the union, under the ministry of defence, and is governed by the coast guard act, 1978.7. mr. nankani, however, strongly urged that on realising ..... the mistake committed by the petitioners in obtaining clearance of the goods under section 90 of the customs act on the basis of misdeclaration in the shipping bills, they have approached the ..... be paid extra on the petitioners furnishing a certificate that the sales tax charges has not been exempted under the sales tax act. the supply order further reserved the right of the coast guard to reject the barges which are offered by the petitioners for inspection. all these conditions set out in the supply order .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 18 1998 (HC)

Air India Ltd. Vs. Appellate Authority Under the Payment of Gratuity A ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 1999(1)ALLMR428; (1999)IILLJ93Bom

..... treaty parties had otherwise agreed to deductions before the coming into force of these beneficial enactments they cannot now be deprivatory. it is precisely to guard against such mischief that the non-obstinate and overriding provisions are engrafted on these statutes. we must realise that the pension scheme came into existence ..... petitioner for payment of gratuity, provident fund, concessional passages and medical facilities cannot be confused with the substantive applications made by the employees under the gratuity act, 1972, which have been entertained by the authorities and have been allowed on merits. there is, thus, no illegality or perversity in the impugned ..... . 2, and (ii) the order dated june 30, 1995 passed by the appellate authority respondent no. 1 under the payment of gratuity act, 1972 (for short, 'gratuity act'). there were separate orders passed by respondent no. 2 controlling authority though the issues involved were identical. under the said orders, the respondents .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 26 2015 (HC)

The Managing Director (M.D.) Maharashtra State Co-operative Tribal Dev ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

..... as the same are relevant for adjudicating the challenge as raised are that the respondent no.1 was employed as a grader with the petitioners since 4-11-1978. he came to be dismissed from service on 23-5-2000. on 18-4-2011, he filed an application before the controlling authority praying that the employer ..... gratuity (maharashtra) rules 1972 in that regard. to buttress his submission that if the employer fails to give any notice under section 7(2) of the said act, there is no question of limitation applying, the learned counsel placed reliance on the judgment of learned single judge in transport manager, kolhapur municipal transport undertaking, kolhapur vs ..... interest at the rate of 10% per annum from 23-6-2000 till its realization. in appeal preferred by the petitioners under section 7(7) of the said act, the appellate authority negatived the challenge to aforesaid order and dismissed the appeal. 4. smt. neeta jog, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners made twofold submissions. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 12 2016 (HC)

Chandrabhaga Machindra Dudhade, Since deceased through legal heir Mach ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

..... as well as several other workers, who are said to be in larger number before the industrial court, ahmednagar. 37. as held herein above, since the payment of gratuity act was a legal obligation cast upon the university, section 7(3a) becomes squarely applicable. the workers have waived interest upto 2005. the entire gratuity amount, as assessed by ..... in which 10 or more persons are employed, or were employed on any day of the preceding 12 months, as a class of establishment to which the said act shall apply with effect from the date of publication of this notification provided nothing contained in this notification shall affect the operation of the notification of the ministry of ..... by the honourable supreme court (a five judges bench) in the matter of bangalore water supply and sewerage board vs. a. rajappa and others, 1978 scc (l and s) 215 : [1978] 2 scc 213. though the issue of revisiting the definition of industry under section 2(j) is referred to the larger bench in the matter of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 26 2004 (TRI)

Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs and

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in : (2004)(170)ELT554Tri(Mum.)bai

..... at new delhi confirmed the accounting of naval stores of pol to coast guard ships.4. notification no. 70/77 as amended from time to time exempts stores supplied to naval ships. coast guard force was constituted under indian coast guard act. the vessels of coast guard therefore belong to that force which are different from naval vessels. one ..... can take a strict view that the coast guard vessels are not naval vessels. further the ar4as filed by the appellant ..... mere suppression of fact does not necessarily mean there was intention to evade duty. the appellants were under the honest impression that supplies made to coast guard vessels, at the behest of indian nevy also are entitled for duty free bunker. suppression of facts with intent to evade duty is not proved .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //