Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: coal mines provident fund and miscellaneous provisions act 1948 section 3 coal mines provident fund scheme Page 1 of about 563 results (0.347 seconds)

Singareni Collieries Co. Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad

Reported in : (1995)53ITD249(Hyd.)

..... (appeals), it was the contention of the assessee that there was no time limit for remittance of recovery towards provident fund in the coal mines provident/fund and bonus scheme acts, though under the a.p. coal mines provident fund scheme, the remittance was to be made before the end of the month following the month to which the ..... held on 27-12-1985 (copy of commissioner's letter enclosed) resolved that in the case of delay in remittande of the coal mines provident fund recoveries as per the scheme, the coal mines provident fund should charge interest on the principal; amount 2 per cent higher than the rate at which interest is allowed to the members ..... the last day of every month following the month to which the contributions relate.a perusal of the above provisions of the coal mines provident fund and miscellaneous provisions act, 1948 and the coal mines provident fund scheme, which applies to the assessee-company, make it absolutely clear that there is in fact a last date for remitting .....

Smt. Asha Rai Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : [2003(2)JCR410(Jhr)]

..... patent.2. we have perused the order dated 27.2.2002 passed by respondent no. 2. we have also seen carefully the relevant paras of the coal mines provident fund scheme framed under section 3 of the coal mines provident funds and miscellaneous provisions act, 1948 and issued vide notification dated 11.12.1948. it is the undisputed case of the parties before us that the payment of ..... that she being a nominee of the deceased jiwan rai was entitled to receive the full provident fund amount standing credited in the aforesaid account, but the regional commissioner, coal mines, provident fund region-ii, dhanbad (respondent no. 2 in this appeal) rejected the appellant's claim for receiving the entire provident fund amount and instead held and directed that the appellant along with parents of the deceased .....

Mafatlal Group Staff Association and Others Etc. Etc. Vs. Regional Com ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1994SC2271; [1994(68)FLR1110]; JT1994(3)SC133; (1994)IILLJ382SC; 1994(2)SCALE420; (1994)4SCC58; [1994]3SCR184; (1994)2UPLBEC859

..... the employee happens to die prematurely, the accumulation to the provident fund are too small to render adequate and long-term ..... objects and reasons leading to the introduction of the family pension fund scheme throws light upon the objectives and purposes sought to be achieved by the new scheme :the coal mines provident fund and bonus scheme act, 1948 and the employee's provident fund act, 1952 provides for the institution of provident funds for employees in coal mines, factories and other establishments. provident fund is an effective old age and survivorship benefit but when .....

Coal Mines Provident Fund Commissioner Vs. Ramesh Chander Jha

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1990SC648; [1990(60)FLR347]; JT1990(1)SC115; 1990LabIC577; 1990(1)SCALE96; (1990)1SCC589; [1990]1SCR181; 1990(1)LC387(SC)

..... and a common seal and shall by the said name sue and be sued.3c. appointment of officers: (1) the central government shall appoint a coal mines provident fund commissioner, who shall be the chief executive officer of the board and shall be subject to the general control and superintendence of the board.2. ...3 ..... notification in the official gazette, frame the coal mines provident fund scheme for the establishment of a provident fund for employees and specify the coal mines to which the said scheme shall apply. the fund shall vest in, and be administered by the board constituted under section 3a. the board thus ..... or remunerated by fees or commission for the performance of any public duty.4. it is necessary to refer to the relevant provision in the coal mines provident fund and miscellaneous provisions act, 1948 for the purpose of determining whether the appellant answers this description. under section 3, the central government may, by .....

Veena Pandey Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... 02.2011. it was also intimated that the 10% surrendered amount had been refunded to all pensioners with interest under the order dated 30.01.2012 of the coal mines provident fund commissioner.5. the appellant was refunded the surrendered amount of 10% with interest (rs. 36,938/-) along with widow pension arrears (rs.12,351/-), in total ..... the pension scheme, 1998. page 2 of 74. the appellant s representation was however rejected. in the letter dated 22.01.2013 of the regional commissioner of the coal mines provident fund organization ( cmpfo for short) it was stated that the pensioner had opted for payment of 90% pension under para 15 (1)(b) of the pension scheme, ..... scheme, 1998 was framed as a measure of social security for ensuring socio-economic justice for the employees in the coal sector under the powers conferred by section 3-e of the coal mines provident fund and miscellaneous provisions act, 1948. page 5 of 711. pension as is well known, is the deferred portion of the compensation1 .....

Shanti Devi Alias Shanti Mishra Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... to retire on 30.04.2005. his papers for settlement of pension were forwarded to the regional commissioner 1, coal mines provident fund, asansol. by letter dated 30.11.2005 written by regional commissioner, coal mines provident fund, region-1, asansol, the late husband of the appellant was asked to deposit 3 the amount of rs.39 ..... to be recovered towards pension payment from may, 2005 to september, 2013. 3.6 by further letter dated 06.11.2013 issued by regional commissioner, coal mines provident fund, region-1, asansol, he was directed to refund amount of rs.8,09,268/- and entire pension contribution alongwith interest. he was communicated that ..... colliery, bankola area, district burdwan, west bengal. ministry of coal, government of india in exercise of power under section 3e of coal mines provident fund and miscellaneous provisions act, 1948 and in supersession of the coal mines family pension scheme, 1971 notified a family coal mines pension scheme, 1998 dated 05.03.1998. late husband of .....

South Eastern Coalfields Ltd. Vs. Jt. Cit

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Nagpur

Reported in : (2002)77TTJ(Nag.)401

..... order, this ground is treated as not pressed by the assessee and the same is dismissed as not pressed.the next issue relating to the disallowance of assessees contribution to coal mines provident fund amounting to rs. 474.14 lakhs is raised in ground nos. 14 and 15 of ita no. 22/nag/2001 for assessment year 1996-97.after considering the ..... scheme, 1998, was formulated vide notification no. g.s.r. 123e, dated 5-3-1998, in exercise of the power conferred under 3e of the coal mines provident fund and miscellaneous provision act, 1948. he submitted that the said scheme came into force from 31-3-1998, vide notification no.s.o. 233(e) dated 20-3- ..... amount so collected by the assessee-company had been paid to the credit of the said fund within the due date specified in the relevant statute. in this regard, it is observed that the pension fund was formally set up under the scheme known as "coal mines pension scheme, 1998" formulated by the central government vide notification dated 30-3-1998. as .....

South Eastern Coalfields Ltd. Vs. Joint Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Nagpur

Reported in : (2003)260ITR1(Nag.)

..... ground is treated as not pressed by the assessee and the same is dismissed as not pressed.31. the next issue relating to the disallowance of assessee's contribution to coal mines provident fund amounting to rs. 474.14 lacs is raised in ground nos. 14 and 15 of ita no. 22/nag/2001 for asst. yr.1996-97. 31.1. ..... scheme, 1998, was formulated vide notification no. g.s.r. 123(e), dt. 5th march ,1998, in exercise of the power conferred under section 3e of the coal mines provident fund and miscellaneous provision act, 1948. he submitted that the said scheme came into force from 31st march, 1998, vide notification no. s.o. 233(e) dt. 20th march, ..... amount so collected by the assessee-company had been paid to the credit of the said fund within the due date specified in the relevant statute. in this regard, it is observed that the pension fund was formally set up under the scheme known as "coal mines pension scheme, 1998" formulated by the central government vide notification dt. 30th march, 1998. .....

All India Bank Officers Confederation Vs. The Regional Manager Central ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... ; and (v) any sum payable by the employer, whether directly or through a fund, other than a recognised provident fund or an approved superannuation fund or a deposit- linked insurance fund established under section 3- g of the coal mines provident fund and miscellaneous provisions act, 1948 (46 of 1948), or, as the case may ..... be, section 6-c of the employees' provident funds and miscellaneous provisions act, 1952 (19 ..... shares allotted/transferred by employer at concessional rate/free of cost. clause (vii) specified amounts contributed to assessees account by employer such as provident fund, superannuation fund etc. clause (viia) annual accretion by way of interest, dividend or other similar amounts with respect to clause (vii).10. after specifically .....

Neena Murudeshwar Vs. Key Publication Ltd. and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : [2005(105)FLR505]; (2005)ILLJ918Bom

..... court arose out of the applications filed by the workmen of the appellant company claiming bonus under the scheme framed by the central government under the coal mines provident funds and bonus schemes act, 1948 and railway fares and leave under the award of the industrial tribunal (colliery disputes) which came into effect as ..... there being anything contrary under such statute or section 33-c(2), cannot fall within sub-section (2). consequently, the benefit provided in the bonus scheme made under the coal mines provident funds and bonus schemes act, 1948 which remains to be computed must fall under sub-section (2) and the labour court therefore ..... independent authority, entitled to look into the grievance of the petitioner for provident fund. he held therefore that he has no jurisdiction to decide the claim for provident fund.(b) the finding is contrary to the judgment of the supreme court in chief mining engineer, east india coal co. ltd., bararee colliery, dhanbad v. rameshwar and ors. .....