Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : (2009)20VST405(AP)
..... it clear that before taking the action, an opinion of the advocate-general of the state of bihar was sought by the respondent. referring to the provisions of the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972, the advocate-general opined that such amount could be claimed by the state government from the appellant-company. reference was made to sections 6 and 7 of the said ..... appellant-company the certificate proceedings could not have been initiated under the bihar and orissa public demands recovery act, 1914, in view of the provisions of the coal bearing areas (acquisition and development) act, 1957, the mines and minerals (regulation and development) act, 1957 and also the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972. but it also cannot be overlooked that the action has been taken under the bihar and .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai
Reported in : AIR1988Bom40; 1988MhLJ184
..... high court in indian cable co. ltd. v. lodna colliery co. ltd., : air1977cal402 , held that the analogous provisions of the coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1973 neither directly nor by implication took away the jurisdiction of the civil courts to entertain suits against the ex-owners of collieries ..... .21. for the purposes of examining the submission ii is necessary to refer to the provisions of the sick textile undertakings (nationalisation) act, 1974 (now called 'the nationalisation act'.)22. section 2 of the nationalisation act is the definition section. clause (d) of subsection () thereof defines 'custodian' to mean a custodian appointed under section 5 ..... indicate the submission and the judgment of the supreme court upon which it is based. the submission is that even assuming that, by reason of the nationalisation act; the liability of the principal debtor stood discharged, the guarantors are not discharged. the submission is based on the judgment in maharashtra state electricity board .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kolkata
Reported in : (2001)3CALLT4(HC),[2001(91)FLR778]
..... ) under the provisions of companies act, 1956. after taking over of the said colliery, ..... d colliery of m/s east india coal co. ltd. and was posted at kendua, dhanbad, bihar. thereafter, he resigned and joined marine coal co. bengal (p) ltd. after the passing of the coal mines nationalisation act. 1972 the government of india took over all the companies and formed coal india limited (hereinafter referred to as cil ..... 24th february, 1997 by the general manager, lodhna area along with other officers for certain acts of omission and commission. the petitioner along with other officers were charge sheeted for shortage of huge quantities of coal. an inquiry was conducted and the petitioner along with other officers were found guilty however, .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai
Reported in : 2007(6)ALLMR611; 2007(5)BomCR481; (2007)109BOMLR1959; 2008(1)MhLj753
..... had executed a sale deed in respect of property (bungalow and lands) owned by company on 20.3.1972. the coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1973 vesting in the central government right, title and interest of owners of coal mines specified in schedule, came into force on 1.5.1973. admittedly the appellant purchasers of property were the wives of the ..... its members. there is no change in the ownership in real sense.27. here we may refer to the case of subhra mukherjee and anr. v. bharat coking coal ltd. and ors. : air2000sc1203 . in that case, their lordships considered the doctrine of lifting of corporate veil. there was allegation of sham and collusive transaction by the ..... section only provides an expeditious way of recovery of bank loans/dues but no where states that such dues will be first charge on property under central act. both acts were enacted by competent legislations for different purposes and there is no conflict between the two. it is also held that the bank's right to recover .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : 2002(1)ALD408; 2002(1)ALT241
..... court e.g. income-tax appellate tribunal, railway claims tribunal, l.i.c., tribunal, tribunal under the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1973 tribunal under waste lands (claims) act, drugs act and companies act. in relation to constitution of various tribunals, qualifications of the members or the presiding officer had been prescribed statutorily. ..... for condonation of delays in such institution vis-a-vis the statutory silence in section 22; (f) whether the provisions of the limitation act enacted pursuant to the legislative field enumerated in the concurrent list (entry 13) is applicable to a tribunal constituted under the special constitutional ..... been constitutedfor the purpose of adjudicating disputes in respect of matters relating to state public service of government of andhra pradesh. the said act provides for a supplemental forum for resolution of service disputes.19. constitution of tribunals by itself cannot be questioned on the ground of .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
Reported in : [2006]287ITR561(Mad)
..... subra mukherjee v. bharat coking coal ltd. : air2000sc1203 . in the said case, directors of a private coal mining company executing sale deed in respect of property (bungalow and lands) owned by company on march 20, 1972, and the coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1973, coming into force on ..... learned senior counsel for the auction purchasers has relied upon the decisions reported in parvinder singh v. renu gautam : air2004sc2299 , subra mukherjee v. bharat coking coal ltd. : air2000sc1203 , madras bangalore transport co. (west) v. inder singh : air1986sc1564 , cit v. sri meenakshi mills ltd. : [1967]63itr609( ..... profile of g. venkateswaran is given as under:particulars of employees as required under section 217(2a) of the companies act, 1956.___________________________________________________________________name age designation and nature grossrentuneration (years) of duties (rs.)___________________________________________________________________mr. g. venkateswaran 43 chairman and managing .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai
Reported in : 2010(112)BomLR2014
..... a word of variable import. in that judgment the right, title and interest of the coke oven plant which is vested in the central government under the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972 was considered. in that case the appeal of the company, in which the right, title and interest of the owners of the plants were to ..... vesting in possession alone would take place; the ownership would not vest.23. considering some of these judgments it has been held in the case of bharat coking coal ltd. v. karam chand thapar & bros. 2002 (8) scale 388 that the term vest in common english acceptation would mean and imply conferment of ownership of ..... nomination the effect of the testamentary disposition itself. hence, any other disposition or nomination under any other law stands subject to the nomination made under the depositories act. section 9.11.7 further shows that the last of the nominations would prevail. this shows the revocable nature of the nomination much like a testamentary disposition. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
Reported in : 2010(1)KLT65
..... sen drew pointed attention to the earlier affidavits filed on behalf of bharat coking coal company and commented severally on the alleged contradictory reasons given therein for the exclusion of certain coke oven plants from the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act. but, in the ultimate analysis, we are not really to concern ourselves ..... promotion, development and enhancing competitiveness of such enterprises and to make recommendations to the central government concerning the above matters. chap. iv of the act deals with the measures for promotion, development and enhancement of competitiveness of micro, small and medium enterprises. it deals with the measures for promotion ..... .8. before dealing with the rival submissions on the validity of section 19, we would briefly refer to the scheme of the act. it is an act to provide for facilitating promotion and development and for enhancing the competitiveness of micro, small and medium enterprises and for matters connected therewith .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Reported in : 2007(7)SCALE590; (2007)4SCC397; 2007(2)LC966(SC)
..... ashoke sen drew pointed attention to the earlier affidavits filed on behalf of bharat coking coal limited and commented severely on the alleged contradictory reasons given therein for the exclusion of certain coke oven plants from the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act. but, in the ultimate analysis, we are not really to concern ourselves with ..... of seats available for non reserved category, could such provision be held to be unconstitutional?(3) whether the central educational institutions (reservation in admission) act, 2006 (act no. 5 of 2007) is violative of articles 14, 15(1), 19, 21 and 29(2) of the constitution?socially advanced persons/sections ..... 15(4) and article 15(5) of the constitution?whether 27% reservation in socially educational backward classes/other backward classes is justified(1) whether the act insofar as it mandates reservation of 27% in all educational institutions (including private aided institutions) irrespective of and unrelated to the 'compelling need' of .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Reported in : AIR2001SC1668; JT2001(4)SC152; 2001(2)SCALE523; (2001)4SCC455; 2001(2)LC858(SC)
..... the need to interpret article 39(b) again arose in the case of sanjeev coke . and anr. : [1983]1scr1000 . while upholding the validity of coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972 and the two other connected enactments the constitution bench adopted the interpretation of article 39(b) as enunciated by krishna iyer, j. in ranganatha reddy's case ..... of untwalia, j. (with whom three other judges agreed), interpreted article 39(b) of the constitution and then came to the conclusion that the act had direct nexus with article 39(b) and by virtue of article 31c its validity could not be challenged on the ground of its being violative of ..... constitution. in state of karnataka and anr. etc. vs . shri ranganatha reddy and anr. etc. : [1978]1scr641 validity of karnataka contract carriages (acquisition) act, 1976 was challenged and the question which arose was whether the state government could acquire and then transfer counter-signed portions of inter state permits to road transport corporation .....
Tag this Judgment!