Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: coal mines nationalisation act 1973 section 17 commissioner of payments to be appointed Court: karnataka Page 1 of about 10 results (0.066 seconds)

Chamundi Hotel (P) Ltd. and ors. Vs. State and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1997KAR1573

..... meeting material needs, not merely public possessions.'in sanjeev coke manufacturing co.'s case4 (supra) the 'material resources' were explained as:-'the next question for consideration is whether the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act is a law directing the policy of the state towards securing 'that the ownership and control of the material resources of the community are so distributed as best to subserve ..... liable to be quashed on the ground that the legislature had not applied its mind while passing the act. on facts, it cannot be said that the present act is on the same subject which is covered by the nationalisation of sick industries (textile undertaking nationalisation) act of 1974 and even if its effect is the same, no legal ground has been shown for quashing .....

Karnataka Power Corporation Limited Vs. Emta Coal Limited

Court : Karnataka

..... said letter, kpcl, also, requested the government of india to issue a 7 notification under section 3(3)(a)(iii)(4) of the coal mines (nationalisation)act, 1973, specifying the end-use as supply of coal exclusively to kpcl. a notification to that effect was published in the gazette on july 16, 2004 by the government of india.5. ..... years 1993 and 2011. the apex court considered the provisions of the coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1973, and found that 9 allotment of coal blocks to state governments or state public sector undertakings to mine coal for commercial use was not permissible. the apex court, also, found that coal could not be extracted through joint venture companies in order to be sold ..... to it. it is, further, pertinent to note that under section 3(3)(a)(iii) of the coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1973, kecml would not be entitled to an allotment of a coal mine, as it is not a company engaged in any of the activities specified in the said section. kecml did not have an end-use .....

Karnataka Power Corporation Limited, rep. by its Asst. General Manager ...

Court : Karnataka

..... the said letter, kpcl, also, requested the government of india to issue a notification under section 3(3)(a)(iii)(4) of the coal mines (nationalisation)act, 1973, specifying the end-use as supply of coal exclusively to kpcl. a notification to that effect was published in the gazette on july 16, 2004 by the government of india. 5. ..... years 1993 and 2011. the apex court considered the provisions of the coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1973, and found that allotment of coal blocks to state governments or state public sector undertakings to mine coal for commercial use was not permissible. the apex court, also, found that coal could not be extracted through joint venture companies in order to be sold ..... to it. it is, further, pertinent to note that under section 3(3)(a)(iii) of the coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1973, kecml would not be entitled to an allotment of a coal mine, as it is not a company engaged in any of the activities specified in the said section. kecml did not have an end- .....

Dr. M Basappa Reddy Vs. State of Karnataka, Rep. by its Chief Secretar ...

Court : Karnataka

..... in or over the land from which coal is obtainable." the hon'ble apex court ..... of a mine of his proprietary rights. on the other hand, various enactments made by the parliament, such as the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972 and the coal bearing areas (acquisition and development) act, 1957 make express declarations under sections 4 and 7 of the act providing for acquisition of the mines and rights ..... ; further, the petitioner has deliberately committed omissions and commissions while working as a director, in contravention of the mines and mineral development regulation act, 1957 (for short, 'mmdr act'); he issued 41 permits through his subordinate territorial officers during the year 2004 which resulted in unauthorized movement of .....

Amalgamated Electricity Company Limited Vs. the Workmen of Amalgamated ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : (1995)IIILLJ769Kant

..... the central government and thereafter in the 1st respondent-company, when section 17 of the coking coal mines nationalisation act provided for continuance of their service notwithstanding the transfer of private ownership to the central government or the ..... the service of the undertaking on the date of vesting. as explained earlier, in the light of the law laid by the supreme court in bharat coking coal limited, 1978-ii llj 17, it is clear that when there is a statutory transfer of employees pursuant to the undertaking being taken over to the ..... for the past acts of the company from whom it took over. in an identical situation the supreme court in the workmen v. the bharat coking coal ltd. and ors. 1978-ii llj 17, held that during the pendency of an industrial dispute regarding the dismissal of workmen, the colliery having been nationalised and vested in .....

Sri B S Dalayath Vs. Bangalore Water Supply &

Court : Karnataka

..... and loss during the period of management of the mine by the central government. thereafter, the coal mines nationalisation laws (amendment) ordinance and act, 1986 was issued. section 19(2) of the principal act as introduced by the amending act act and section 19 of the amending act act providing that the amount payable as compensation shall be ..... deemed to include and deemed always to have included in the amount required to be paid to the owner in respect of all the coal ..... in stock on the date immediately before the appointed date. the said amending act act was held to be valid as it altered the basis of the principal act with retrospective effect as a result of which the court's judgment .....

K.S. Achuthan and ors. Vs. State of Mysore Represented by Its Chief Se ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1968KAR965

..... stated in that paragraph is:'i submit that it is evident from the order of the chief minister that it is pursuant to a general predetermined policy of nationalisation that the scheme has been approved and influenced the decision of the chief minister, rather than the merits of the proposed scheme as one satisfying the condition ..... that the approved scheme stands vitiated by reason of the fact that the chief minister who accorded his approval to it was determined to implement the policy of nationalisation and was so biased. the fourth submission was that there was long delay in according approval to the scheme and that the approval accorded in the year ..... required under section 68-c of the m. v. act.'this part of the affidavit makes it clear that according to the petitioners the bias on which they depend is displayed by the order which according to them demonstrates a general predetermined policy of nationalisation. it was submitted by mr. shetty that notwithstanding an allegation .....

Guruanna Vadi and Another Vs. the General Manager, Karnataka State Roa ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2001ACJ1528; AIR2001Kant275; ILR2001KAR2879; 2001(5)KarLJ322

..... indicated in the second schedule. the conferment of the right to receive the compensation prescribed under second schedule is notwithstanding anything contained elsewhere in the act and is, therefore, absolute and final. the absence of any other provision relating to any other right to claim compensation after receiving the compensation ..... claims tribunals and then the insurers may be allowed six months time to confirm their prima facie liability subject to the defences available under motor vehicles act, 1988. after such confirmations of prima fade liability by the insurers, the claimants should be required to exercise their option for conciliation under structured ..... was that after taking note of the observations made by the various courts and the difficulties experienced in implementing the various provisions of the motor vehicles act, the government of india appointed a review committee to go into the problems faced by claimants, surface transport ministry and the like. review committee .....

Guruanna Vedi and anr. Vs. General Manager, Karnataka State Road Trans ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : III(2002)ACC350

..... as indicated in the second schedule. the conferment of the right to receive the compensation prescribed under second schedule is notwithstanding anything contained elsewhere in the act and is, therefore, absolute and final. the absence of any other provision relating to any other right to claim compensation after receiving the compensation ..... claims tribunals and then the insurers may be allowed six months' time to confirm their prima facie liability subject to the defences available under motor vehicles act, 1988. after such confirmations of prima facie liability by the insurers, the claimants should be required to exercise their option for conciliation under structured ..... was that after taking note of the observations made by the various courts and the difficulties experienced in implementing the various provisions of the motor vehicles act, the government of india appointed a review committee to go into the problems faced by claimants, surface ministry and the like. review committee came .....

B. Satyanarayana Singh Vs. Karnataka State Transport Appellate Tribuna ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1985KAR395

..... c, it may be stated here that kampli to bridge (bellary border) comes within the municipal limits of kampli town and that being so the bellary, scheme of nationalisation does not come in the way of grant of temporary permit according to the ruling of the hon'ble high court of karnataka in w.ps. 498, 499 ..... of the application. the ksrtc participated in the proceedings objected to the application, but did not file any application for grant of permit under section 68f(1a) of the act, until it was granted to the petitioner. even to this day, no such application is filed. therefore, the question for consideration is whether in a case where ..... petitioner, ksta called for the report from the deputy commissioner for transport for gulbarga division, gulbarga for grant of a stage carnage permit under section 68f(1c) of the act, on the route vaddarahatti to kampli. the deputy commissioner for transport, gulbarga division, gulbarga submitted his report as per annexure-b. the report is a detailed one. .....