Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: coal mines nationalisation act 1973 section 17 commissioner of payments to be appointed Court: rajasthan Page 1 of about 1 results (0.092 seconds)

Miss Richa JaIn Vs. Registrar of Companies and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : [1990]69CompCas248(Raj)

..... minerals and properties ltd., in liquidation, were working on coal mines and marble mines. however, the coal mines were nationalised by the government of india under the coking coal mines (emergency provisions) ordinance, 1971, replaced by the coking coal mines. (emergency provisions) act, 1971, and the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972, as well as the coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1973. it was also contended that the company had three mining leas'es at village bar, district pali, narvar, district .....

Punjab National Bank and Etc. Vs. Official Liquidator and Etc.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1986Raj40; 1985(1)WLN484

..... cannot be regarded as a mining company in as much as apart from coking coal mines and the coal mines which were nationalised under the provisions of the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act 1972 and the coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1973 the company has other assets also.10. the expression 'mining company' has been defined in section 3(1) of the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972 to mean a company owning a coking coal mine. the aforesaid definition implies that ..... a company would be a mining company under the aforesaid .....

Sayar Vs. Judge, Labour Court and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1988(2)WLN305

..... of sub-sections (1) and (2) of section 9 and sub-section (1) of section 17 of the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972. there is no dispute that sub-section (1) of section 17 and sub-sections (1) and (2) of section 9 of that act correspond to subsection (1) of section 14 and subsections (1) and (3) of section 5 of the 1974 ..... the plain language of these provisions.9. the supreme court decision in bharat coking coal ltd. (supra) related to a dismissed workman of colliery which was nationalised and vested in the central government and thereafter in the bharat coking coal ltd. by virtue of the provisions contained in the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972. this change occurred during the pendency of an industrial dispute arising from .....

Maharaval Lakshmansingh Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : [1986]160ITR103(Raj)

..... occupation' has been stated to mean actual holding or possession, esp. of a place or of land. 13. the words 'owner' and 'occupier', as used in coking coal mines (nationalisation) act (no. xxxvi of 1972), came up for consideration before their lordships of the supreme court in industrial supplies pvt. ltd. v. union of india : [1981]1scr375 , ..... 'occupant' means a person who occupies a particular place or premises. in black's law dictionary, 'occupation' has been stated to mean control, use ; the act or process by which real property is possessed and enjoyed ; where a person exercises physical control over land.' 12. the word 'occupation' has been defined in 'words ..... palace in the occupation of a ruler, being a palace, the annual value whereof was exempt from income-tax before the commencement of the constitution (twenty-sixth amendment) act, 1971, by virtue of the provisions of the merged states (taxation concessions) order, 1949, or the part b states (taxation concessions) order, 1950, or, .....

P. Paliwal and ors. Vs. Hindustan Zinc Limited and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

..... the company but the central government dis-invested its investment in the respondent-hzl, for which appropriate order was passed by the government of india, ministry of coal and mines department of mines on 15.5.2002(ann. r/3) resulting into reduction of the share of the government of india to lower than 49.22% which is less ..... was not regulatory in nature. for vesting of undertaking in hzl, the undertaking of the mci was taken over by the government of india by the act of 1965, act of 1966 and act of 1976 and then undertaking was transferred to hzl. in jialal kapur's case, the division bench of this court was influenced by the fact ..... of the respondent is that the respondent-company is engaged in commercial activity. the commercial activity itself is not a decisive factor nor body's registration under the companies act itself is decisive. the decisive criteria as already referred and discussed above, clearly proves the respondent to be 'other authority' within the meaning of article 12 of .....

The Raj. State Mines and Minerals Ltd Vs. State and ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... a very ambitious project relating to electrical energy. it is emphasised that the petitioner company is regularly depositing a huge amount in escrow account with a nationalised bank and the area concerned, which as a matter of fact is part of arid zone, shall be converted into environment friendly region by flux of ..... in db civil writ petition no.1852/2002, this application is preferred. the review petitioner, a government company incorporated under the companies act, 1956, is engaged with the business of mining/excavation of various minerals. an ambitious project under joint venture for supply of lignite to a power plant from kapurdi and jalipa lignite ..... mines is in the hands of the company. the competent authorities of the government of india and the government of rajasthan after having thorough studies found the project in public interest and also economically viable. the ministry of coal, government of india, thus, allocated parcels of .....

Nathulal and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1976Raj202; 1976(9)WLN238

..... state transport undertaking, known as rajasthan state road transport corporation (hereinafter called as 'the corporation') published a proposed scheme of nationalisation under section 68-c of the motor vehicles act (hereinafter referred to as 'the act') in respect of udaipur--beawar via kailashpuri, delwara, nath-dwara, kankroli, gomti daver-kamlighat choraha-kamlighat, deogarh, barar ..... no objector shall be entitled to be heard by the state government under section 68-d (2) of the act unless he has preferred objections in respect of the proposed scheme of nationalisation in accordance with the provisions of rule 5. in the cases before me, the petitioners having failed to file ..... of the learned counsel for the petitioners was that the publication of the proposed scheme of nationalisation in the newspaper 'navjyoti' was not sufficient compliance with the provisions of section 68-d (1) of the act, as the said newspaper did not have wide circulation in village asind, in which the petitioners .....

Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation Vs. Regional Transport Auth ...

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1979Raj120

..... on the bharatpur-bhusawar route shall not be precluded in future to get the renewal of their permits under the provisions of the m. v. act in spiteof the nationalisation of the bharatpur-jaipur route.with respect to the learned judge, i amconstrained to say that he has proceeded on erroneous premises and drawn anequally erroneous ..... of this court raise a common question as to the true meaning of the words 'till the validity of the aforesaid permits' appearing in the scheme of nationalisation of passenger road transport services on the jaipur-bharatpur route and of similar words appearing in the similar scheme as to the jaipur-alwar route, both duly ..... approved and published in accordance with the provisions of section 68-d, motor vehicles act, 1939 (for short, the act), in the rajasthan gazette extraordinary dated, december 14, 1960. the expression 'approved scheme' will hereafter be used as having reference to either or both .....

Pesticides India and anr. Vs. Assistant Collector of Central Excise an ...

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1987(30)ELT651(Raj); 1987(1)WLN370

..... is pragmatic. the first proceeds on the general ground that all national wealth and means of producing it should come under national control, whilst the second supports nationalisation only on grounds of efficiency and increased out-put.' 14. both public and private sectors are recognised' to play their roles to the common well of the ..... . this is the only conceivable purpose behind declaring a particualr place as a waehousing station. the parliament, by enacting sections 9, 57 and 58 of the act clearly provided for the above mentioned facility for the purpose of industries which cater, not only to the personal needs of their share holders, or owners but ..... section 45. therefore, the provisions have been made for declaring the place to be warehousing station and appointing warehouses under sections 9, 57 & 58 of the act. section 9 says that the board may by notification in the official gazette declare places to be warehousing stations at which alone public warehouses may be appointed and .....

Central Ware-housing Corporation, Sriganganagar Vs. State of Rajasthan ...

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1995Raj180

..... rustom cavasjee cooper v. union of india, (1970) 3 scr 530,555 : (air 1970 sc 564 at page 584) (the banks nationalisation case) it was held:- 'a company registered under the companies act is a legal person, separate and distinct from its individual members. property of the company is not the property of the share-holders. a ..... iii) the aforesaid question about the interpretation of article 285(1) of the constitution of india came up for consideration before the apex court in the case of western coal-fields limited v. special area development authority korba, (air 1981 sc 697), in which hon'ble chandrachud c.j. (as he then was) speaking for the ..... is a 'state'within the meaning of article 12 of the constitution of india. according to the answeringrespondents, the exempt ion under section 6(a) ofthe act of 1964 has been granted only to thelands and buildings owned or administeredby the state government or the centralgovernment or the local authority. sincethe petitioner-corporation does hot .....