Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: coal mines nationalisation act 1973 preamble 1 coal mines nationalisation act 1973 Page 14 of about 10,848 results (0.438 seconds)

Central Coalfields Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : [1999(81)FLR29]; JT1998(8)SC81; (1998)IIILLJ715SC; (1998)9SCC192

..... the prior service of a workman continuing in service after 1-5-1972 under the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972 has to be included in the length of service for determining the amount of gratuity payable to such a workman under the payment of gratuity act, 1972. the high court, by the impugned judgment, has taken the view that the ..... in section 9 is that the central government is not to be liable for the prior liabilities of the owner, agent, manager or managing director of a coking coal mine or coke oven plant in relation to any period prior to the appointed day (1-5-1972) and that such prior liability would be of the earlier owner and ..... submitted that the position with regard to such workmen who were employed by one or more contractors prior to the nationalisation, with effect from 1-5-1972, is different from that of the workmen directly employed by the mine owner and, therefore, the workmen employed by the contractor and not directly by the owner would not be entitled .....

Sujana Metal Products Limited Vs. Commercial Tax Officer, Panjagutta D ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : (2009)20VST405(AP)

..... it clear that before taking the action, an opinion of the advocate-general of the state of bihar was sought by the respondent. referring to the provisions of the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972, the advocate-general opined that such amount could be claimed by the state government from the appellant-company. reference was made to sections 6 and 7 of the said ..... appellant-company the certificate proceedings could not have been initiated under the bihar and orissa public demands recovery act, 1914, in view of the provisions of the coal bearing areas (acquisition and development) act, 1957, the mines and minerals (regulation and development) act, 1957 and also the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972. but it also cannot be overlooked that the action has been taken under the bihar and .....

South Central Railway and ors. Vs. Mutha NavIn Krishna and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2007(2)ALD726

..... it clear that before taking the action, an opinion of the advocate general of the state of bihar was sought by the respondent. referring to the provisions of the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972, the advocate general opined that such amount could be claimed by the state government from the appellant company. reference was made to sections 6 and 7 of the said ..... appellant company the certificate proceedings could not have been initiated under the bihar and orissa public demands recovery act, 1914, in view of the provisions of the coal bearing areas (acquisition and development) act, 1957, the mines and minerals (regulation and development) act, 1957 and also the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972. but it also cannot be overlooked that the action has been taken under the bihar and .....

Central Coalfields Ltd. Vs. T.M.S. Engineering and Construction Compan ...

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : [2004(4)JCR437(Jhr)]

..... the impugned judgment that proforma dependent-respondent no. 7 was the owner of karampura dewarkhand colliery prior to the vesting of the coal mines under the coal mines (nationalization) act. 1973 and the plaintiff-respondent had entered into a contract with him for removal of the overburden work in the said colliery ..... aforesaid bills informed the plaintiff-respondent that the aforesaid equipments in question stood vested in the central government and, thereafter, with the coal mines authority under the coal mines (nationalization) act, 1973 on and from 01.05.1973 and the question of giving them back or payment of hire charges therefore to the ..... karanpura dewarkhand colliery private limited was the owner of karanpura dewarkhand colliery, p.o. khelari. district ranchi prior to the vesting of the coal mines under the coal mines (nationalization) act, 1973 and the plaintiff-respondent entered into a contract with defendant-respondent no. 7 for removal of over burden work in the said .....

Bhanu Pratap Singh and anr. Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr.

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : [2006(4)JCR133(Jhr)]

..... the lease hold area and after settlement the erstwhile colliery were doing mining operation until nationalization of the coal mines by virtue of enactment of cooking coal mines (nationalization) act, 1972. after nationalization, the petitioners had been doing mining operation without any hindrance till the year 1999. when forest official ..... the petitioners submits that some back grounds would be necessary for better appreciation of this case and those are that the coal mines was taken by the erstwhile colliery from the rightful owner under permanent settlement through a registered deed giving some right over ..... directed the chief zonal manager not to carry out the mining activities in the mauza ghanudih as that amount violation of the provisions of the forest conservation act .....

South Eastern Coalfields Ltd. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh.

Court : Madhya Pradesh Jabalpur

..... streets and fire fighting are applicable to city not to the coal mines. the municipality cannot carry out any function in coal mines. conservancy is the function of the coal mines under section 20 of the mines act. coal mines are also responsible for cleanliness of canteen and its precincts under mines rules, 1967. under mines rules 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38 and ..... for coalmining purpose to m/s acc company in the year 1941, later on the coal mines were nationalized under the coal mines nationalization act, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as the act of 1973). under section 11 of the act of 1973, the mine can be vested in the central government company and the government company will be entitled ..... in the nature of fee for the service rendered by jal sansthan.11. coming to the question whether levy of charges entrench upon regulation of coal mines under the mmrd act. the apex court in state of west bengal v. kesoram industies ltd. and others (supra) considered the taxing power of union and states. .....

Property Owners' Association and Ors. etc. etc. Vs. State of Maharasht ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2001SC1668; JT2001(4)SC152; 2001(2)SCALE523; (2001)4SCC455; 2001(2)LC858(SC)

..... the need to interpret article 39(b) again arose in the case of sanjeev coke . and anr. : [1983]1scr1000 . while upholding the validity of coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972 and the two other connected enactments the constitution bench adopted the interpretation of article 39(b) as enunciated by krishna iyer, j. in ranganatha reddy's case ..... of untwalia, j. (with whom three other judges agreed), interpreted article 39(b) of the constitution and then came to the conclusion that the act had direct nexus with article 39(b) and by virtue of article 31c its validity could not be challenged on the ground of its being violative of ..... constitution. in state of karnataka and anr. etc. vs . shri ranganatha reddy and anr. etc. : [1978]1scr641 validity of karnataka contract carriages (acquisition) act, 1976 was challenged and the question which arose was whether the state government could acquire and then transfer counter-signed portions of inter state permits to road transport corporation .....

Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. United Collieries Ltd. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1985SC192; [1985(50)FLR166]; 1984(2)SCALE899; (1985)1SCC305; [1985]2SCR209; 1985(17)LC522(SC)

..... government. it further stated that if they failed to hand over possession of the car, they would be liable to prosecution under the act. thereupon respondent no, 1, united collieries limited, the owners of the coal mine, and the aforesaid d.d. diddi, the erstwhile technical advisor of the north chirimiri collieries, filed a petition under article 226 of ..... no. 1, the united collieries limited, which was nationalized under sub-section (1) of section 3 of the coal mines (nationalization) act, 1973 w.e.f. may, 1,1973, was or was not covered by the definition of the term 'mine' in section 2(h)(xii) and therefore stood transferred to and became vested in, the central government free from ..... contained in section 2(h)(xii) and vested in the central government under sub-section (1) of section 3 of the coal mines (nationalization) act, 1973. merely because the technical advisor was putting the staff car 10 his personal use or for multifarious activities of the thapar group of industries would not .....

Bhanu Pratap Singh and anr. Vs. the State of Jharkhand and anr.

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : [2006(4)JCR298(Jhr)]

..... the lease hold area and after settlement the erstwhile colliery were doing mining operation until nationalization of the coal mines by virtue of enactment of cooking coal mines (nationalization) act, 1972. after nationalization, the petitioners had been doing mining operation without any hindrance till the year 1999, when forest official ..... the petitioners submits that some back grounds would be necessary for better appreciation of this case and those are that the coal mines was taken by the erstwhile colliery from the rightful owner under permanent settlement through a registered deed giving some right over ..... directed the chief zonal manager not to carry out the mining activities in the mauza ghanudih as that amount violation of the provisions of the forest conservation act .....

Ashoka Kumar Thakur Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 2007(7)SCALE590; (2007)4SCC397; 2007(2)LC966(SC)

..... ashoke sen drew pointed attention to the earlier affidavits filed on behalf of bharat coking coal limited and commented severely on the alleged contradictory reasons given therein for the exclusion of certain coke oven plants from the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act. but, in the ultimate analysis, we are not really to concern ourselves with ..... of seats available for non reserved category, could such provision be held to be unconstitutional?(3) whether the central educational institutions (reservation in admission) act, 2006 (act no. 5 of 2007) is violative of articles 14, 15(1), 19, 21 and 29(2) of the constitution?socially advanced persons/sections ..... 15(4) and article 15(5) of the constitution?whether 27% reservation in socially educational backward classes/other backward classes is justified(1) whether the act insofar as it mandates reservation of 27% in all educational institutions (including private aided institutions) irrespective of and unrelated to the 'compelling need' of .....