Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: coal mines nationalisation act 1973 preamble 1 coal mines nationalisation act 1973 Court: kolkata Page 1 of about 373 results (0.217 seconds)

Shethia Mining and Manufacturing Corporation Ltd. Vs. Commercial Tax O ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : [1977]39STC246(Cal)

..... that case were very much different from the facts of the instant case before me. further, in the view i have taken of the effect of section 3 of the coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1973, it is not necessary for me to rest my decision on the ratio of the aforesaid decision referred to hereinbefore. in an appropriate case, if section 17 ..... in any court except with the consent of the central government.6. it appears that on 9th july, 1973, there was a notification under section 5 of the coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1973, which was to the following effect:g.s.r. 345(e).-in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 5 of the ..... carried on by the petitioner. in the aforesaid view of the fact, the ownership in relation to the coal mines has been nationalised or taken by the government, but the effect of section 3 of the coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1973, is not that the ownership of the business as such has been taken over. as a matter of fact, the business of the .....

Coal India Ltd Vs. Indian Explosive Ltd. and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : 2006(3)CHN433

..... the coal mines (nationalisation) act to suggest that these supplies were for better administration and better yield from the coal mines and since the coal is being consumed by the public, there would be a public law element involved. we do not agree. in that way ..... the regular supply of proper material, that is the explosives in this case. now merely because the mines are nationalized under the coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1973 and that is how, they go under the management and ownership of coal india, there would be no question of any public law being involved or public good being involved. sri banerjee tried to rely on the preamble of .....

Sushil Kumar Chakraborty and ors. Vs. Lic of India and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : (1984)ILLJ503Cal

..... need for bringing uniformity in service conditions of employees of different insurance companies who have become the employees of the corporation in view of nationalisation. but by the impugned order of 1978, the government purported to exercise power under section 11(2) with regard to the development officers ..... looked after their performance. mr. chatterjee therefore, contends that the development officers being workmen are fully covered by the provisions of industrial disputes act, 1947. accordingly, the settlements and agreements entered between the development officer through the federation and the life insurance corporation cannot be changed by ..... , 1960 are under challenge.2. the petitioners are development officers of life insurance corporation, a statutory corporation created under the life insurance corporation act, 1956. it appears that initially the emoluments and salaries of the development officers were settled by negotiations and agreements between the administration of the .....

Sibdas Mukherjee Vs. Chief General Manager-i, Eastern Coalfields

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : (1997)IIILLJ862Cal

..... by the respondents appointing one subhas mondal. the petitioner's father died on february 23, 1973. prior to the nationalisation of coalmines, it can safely be presumed that his father had been working in the colliery which was under the private ownership. coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1973, although received the assent of the president of india on may 31, 1973, it was given a retrospective ..... effect and retroactive operation with effect from may 1, 1973. it is, therefore, evident that prior to the nationalisation of the said colliery, the petitioner's father died. learned counsel .....

Kallol Kumar Mukherjee and ors. Vs. State of West Bengal

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : (1994)2CALLT43(HC)

..... these cases. it is however argued by the learned advocate for the state that after the advent of the coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1973 the aforesaid decontrol notifications are not effective nor applicable. in this connection, he referred to sections 3, 11 and 28 of the coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1973. the said section 3 inter alia speaks of transfer of the right, title and interest of the ..... for the state that the aforesaid government orders are or the colliery control order, 1945 itself is no more applicable after the advent of coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1973 is therefore found to be untenable. the provisions of the e.c. act not being attracted to the allegations made, the charge-sheets submitted in both the cases under section 7(1)(a)(ii) e.c .....

Eastern Coalfields Limited and anr. Vs. Assistant Labour Commissioner ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : (2001)IILLJ1467Cal

..... the relevant point of time inasmuch as one rasik lal vorah could not represent the employers at that time because of coal mines (nationalisation) act. mr. ghosh contends that the moment coal mines (nationalisation) act came into operation, employer's interest vested in central government and as such rasik lal vorah, the previous owner could not represent the employer any further. thus, mr. ghosh continues, ..... ) of rule 19 read with rule 20 of the contract labour (regulation and abolition) central rules 1971 ('rule'). 2. the petitioner no. 1 carries on business of raising and selling coal from collieries covered by the coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1973. by a notification dated february 1, 1975, the central government in exercise of powers under section 10 of the .....

Benaras Electric Light and Power Co. Ltd. Vs. U.P. State Electricity B ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : [1983]53CompCas597(Cal)

..... also been used but does not include the book debts on the face of it. he also referred to the definition of the word ' undertaking ' in the mrtp act, and the coal mines nationalisation act, 1973, and the sick textile mills nationalisation act, 1975, where the word 'undertaking' has been defined and has been made inclusive of book debts. in the present ..... book debts up to the date of the taking over, as it has been done in other cases like the mrtp act, the coal nationalisation act, the sick textile nationalisation act, etc. this is a sort of confiscation of the properties under the said electricity act and the u. p. amendment and it has to be very strictly construed and, in my view, the word ' undertaking ' can .....

Ananga Mohan Ghosh. Vs. Eastern Coalfields Ltd. and ors.

Court : Kolkata Appellate

..... was a school final pass. 3. according to the petitioner, the colliery was taken over by m/s. eastern coalfield ltd. as a subsidiary of coal india ltd. and thereafter nationalised under the provisions of the coal mines nationalisation act, 1973. 4. according to the further case of the petitioner, the respondent authorities issued a service excerpt to all its employees including the petitioner on or .....

Eastern Coal Fields Ltd. Vs. Regional Labour Commissioner, (Central) a ...

Court : Kolkata

..... .2. it appears that the respondent no. 2 sunil kumar bose was an employee of the bengal coal company limited and messrs. andrew yule and company limited was at one time the managing agent of bengal coal company limited. before the coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1973, the conditions of service of the said sunil kumar bose used to be governed by certain rules called andrew yule ..... and co. ltd. clerical staff terms and conditions of service and standard office procedure. after the said nationalisation act, the said sunil kumar bose became an employee of .....

Bharat Coking Coal Limited. Vs. Jharia Talkies and Cold Storage Privat ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : (1992)2CALLT357(HC),97CWN122

..... which was constituted on 1st january, 1972, was appointed by the central government, as custodian of coking coal mines/coke oven plants. subsequently, by virtue of the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972, all coking coal mines/coke oven plants were nationalised, including those of the writ petitioner free from all encumbrances. subsequently, by a notification issued by the ..... granted leave in the writ petitioners herein to seek remedy, if any, before the commissioner of payment, in accordance with the provisions of the coal mines (nationalisation) act of 1972.20. mr. mullick submitted that not only had no part of the cause of action had arisen within the state of west bengal ..... the writ petitioner/respondent herein on the basis of the lease granted in its favour, stood reseinded under the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972, and by virtue of the provisions of the said act, the right, title and interest, if any, of the writ petitioner herein in the demised land, vested in .....