Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: coal mines nationalisation act 1973 preamble 1 coal mines nationalisation act 1973 Court: karnataka Page 1 of about 934 results (0.248 seconds)

Apr 12 2016 (HC)

Karnataka Power Corporation Limited Vs. Emta Coal Limited

Court : Karnataka

..... said letter, kpcl, also, requested the government of india to issue a 7 notification under section 3(3)(a)(iii)(4) of the coal mines (nationalisation)act, 1973, specifying the end-use as supply of coal exclusively to kpcl. a notification to that effect was published in the gazette on july 16, 2004 by the government of india.5. ..... years 1993 and 2011. the apex court considered the provisions of the coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1973, and found that 9 allotment of coal blocks to state governments or state public sector undertakings to mine coal for commercial use was not permissible. the apex court, also, found that coal could not be extracted through joint venture companies in order to be sold ..... to it. it is, further, pertinent to note that under section 3(3)(a)(iii) of the coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1973, kecml would not be entitled to an allotment of a coal mine, as it is not a company engaged in any of the activities specified in the said section. kecml did not have an end-use .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 12 2016 (HC)

Karnataka Power Corporation Limited, rep. by its Asst. General Manager ...

Court : Karnataka

..... the said letter, kpcl, also, requested the government of india to issue a notification under section 3(3)(a)(iii)(4) of the coal mines (nationalisation)act, 1973, specifying the end-use as supply of coal exclusively to kpcl. a notification to that effect was published in the gazette on july 16, 2004 by the government of india. 5. ..... years 1993 and 2011. the apex court considered the provisions of the coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1973, and found that allotment of coal blocks to state governments or state public sector undertakings to mine coal for commercial use was not permissible. the apex court, also, found that coal could not be extracted through joint venture companies in order to be sold ..... to it. it is, further, pertinent to note that under section 3(3)(a)(iii) of the coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1973, kecml would not be entitled to an allotment of a coal mine, as it is not a company engaged in any of the activities specified in the said section. kecml did not have an end- .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 19 1989 (HC)

Amalgamated Electricity Company Limited Vs. the Workmen of Amalgamated ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : (1995)IIILLJ769Kant

..... the central government and thereafter in the 1st respondent-company, when section 17 of the coking coal mines nationalisation act provided for continuance of their service notwithstanding the transfer of private ownership to the central government or the ..... the service of the undertaking on the date of vesting. as explained earlier, in the light of the law laid by the supreme court in bharat coking coal limited, 1978-ii llj 17, it is clear that when there is a statutory transfer of employees pursuant to the undertaking being taken over to the ..... for the past acts of the company from whom it took over. in an identical situation the supreme court in the workmen v. the bharat coking coal ltd. and ors. 1978-ii llj 17, held that during the pendency of an industrial dispute regarding the dismissal of workmen, the colliery having been nationalised and vested in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 26 2019 (HC)

Sri B S Dalayath Vs. Bangalore Water Supply &

Court : Karnataka

..... and loss during the period of management of the mine by the central government. thereafter, the coal mines nationalisation laws (amendment) ordinance and act, 1986 was issued. section 19(2) of the principal act as introduced by the amending act act and section 19 of the amending act act providing that the amount payable as compensation shall be ..... deemed to include and deemed always to have included in the amount required to be paid to the owner in respect of all the coal ..... in stock on the date immediately before the appointed date. the said amending act act was held to be valid as it altered the basis of the principal act with retrospective effect as a result of which the court's judgment .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 31 2009 (HC)

Mspl Limited, Rep by Its Executive Director. Vs. the State of Karnatak ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2009(1)KCCR5(SN)

..... industries department [copy produced at annexure-r4 to the affidavit of the secretary dated 19-10-2006], addressed to the secretary to government of india, ministry of coals and mines, new delhi, it is obvious that the state government had rethinking about its own recommendations, as some of the recommendations were not in order. in the ..... the purpose of maintaining uniformity and according equal opportunity to all the applicants.55. the recommendation of the committee suggesting modification in the mining laws and changes brought about by act no 38 of 1999 for the purpose of ensuring that only valid applications filed in response to a notification under rule 59 are ..... upon the state government to exhibit due awareness of this fact and to take into consideration all the requisite aspects from the context of the conservation acts, protection acts and then to embark upon the issue of notification. it is also necessary on the part of the state government to weigh the competing interest of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 03 1984 (HC)

Bapuji Educational Association Vs. State

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1986Kant119

..... unable to see any force in this submission. the distribution between public, private and joint sectors and die extent and range of any scheme of nationalisation are essentially matters of state policy which are inherently inappropriate subjects for judicial review, scales of justice are just riot designed to weigh competing social ..... for review in minerva mill's case is stated to be still pending before the court. in sanjeev coke mfg. co. v. m's. bharat coking coal, ltd. : [1983]1scr1000 another constitution bench has expressed doubt on the correctness of the decision rendered in minerva mills' case. but, this court is ..... of the management of various private engineering colleges in the state, have questioned the constitutional validity of the karnataka educational institutions (prohibition of capitation fee) act, 1984 ('the act' for short) and orders issued thereunder, the following main question arises forconsideration :where the fundamental rights guaranteed to the citizens under arts. 19(1 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 27 1987 (HC)

Bangalore Water Supply and Vs. Kantha Chandra

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1987KAR1617

..... bodies. there are provisions which provide for deemed rejection also. for example, the mineral concession rules, 1960 provide that in case an application for grant of mining lease or prospecting licence is not granted within a prescribed period by the concerned state government, such an application must be deemed to have been rejected. the ..... be and it has to be complied with for raising a new township.27. a reading of the aforesaid provisions contained in the planning act and the act (karnataka land revenue act, 1964) leads to an inevitable conclusion that for the change in the land use for the purpose of establishing a new village or a ..... of the constitution to ensure that the tribunals or authorities functioning within the territory over which its jurisdiction extends, do not exceed their limited jurisdiction and act well within their jurisdiction and exercise judicial power entrusted to them within the parameter of their authority. the power of superintendence under article 227 of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 27 1998 (HC)

Dr. Radhakrishna Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. and ors. Vs. State ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1998KAR3794

..... list ii schedule vii read as follows : '5. local government, that is to say, the constitution and powers of municipal corporations, improvement trusts, district boards, mining settlement authorities and other local authorities for the purpose of local self-government or village administration. 6. public health and sanitation; hospital and dispensaries. 17. water, ..... covers the field relating to public health and sanitation, hospital and dispensaries. entry 17 covers the field relating to drainage and embankments. as stated earlier, act 1987 does not provide for any acquisition of land and it only provides for declaration whether the land is required for a public purpose or not. ..... that the authority cannot arbitrarily deal with the civic amenity site while allotting the same in favour of third persons. under the provisions of the act, and rules sufficient safeguards are provided in order to develop the civic amenity site.26. in most of the petitions, the petitioners have already surrendered .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 09 1991 (HC)

V. Lakshmipathy Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1991KAR1334; 1991(2)KarLJ453

..... who led a crusade to clean up a river in massachusettes;b) a california pharmacist who saved a red-wood forest;c) a pennsylvania mine-inspector who repaired a strip-mined land;d) a wisconsin architect who saved a town affected by floods and redesigned it as a flood-proof solar village;e) a plumber from ..... and sri h. thipperudrappa for the b.d.a.13. of contextual relevance is sub-section (3) of section 9 of the karnataka town and country planning act, 1961 ('the act' for short) which reads as follows:-'(3) notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (2), - (i) if any planning authority has prepared a plan for the ..... by the location and operation of industries and industrial enterprises in a residential area in alleged gross violation of the provisions of the karnataka town and country planning act. the petitioners are questioning industrial activity in residential locality by establishing and running factories, work-shops, factory sheds, manufacture of greases and lubricating oils by .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 27 1984 (HC)

Charles D'souza Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Karnataka-ii

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : (1984)40CTR(Kar)353; [1984]147ITR694(KAR); [1984]147ITR694(Karn)

..... assessment done after issue of notice under s. 148 and the phrase 'as far as may be' must be interpreted to apply to all assessments under the act. 40. this contention overlooks the definition of 'regular assessment' which the legislature has expressly provided for with all the implications thereof. when the said expression is ..... sanctioned by the section. what section 148 enacts is to treat the reassessment proceedings as assessment proceedings and proceed accordingly under section 139 and other provisions of the act. so understood, we are unable to accept the argument of the counsel for the petitioner. we, therefore, hold that the levy of interest under the impugned ..... ) and other penal provisions which deal with cases of concealment of income. 31. the learned authors, kanga and palkhivala, at page 71 of their book, i.t. act 1961 (vol.1), have observed that the expression 'regular assessment' means assessments made under s. 143 or s. 144 in contradistinction to assessments under s. 140a, a .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //