Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: coal mines labour welfare fund repeal act 1986 Page 1 of about 9,795 results (0.460 seconds)

Kedar Nath Mishra Vs. Appellant Authority Under Payment of Gratuity Ac ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : [2008(118)FLR640]; (2008)IIILLJ311MP

..... learned counsel for the petitioner had 'not been able to show any analogous provision in the repeal act which is annexure p/1. in the repeal act namely coal mines labour welfare fund (repeal act, 1986), there is no analogous provision to section 12 which was considered by the division bench of calcutta high court. section 12 which was considered ..... such retirement benefits from the government as would have been admissible to them on that date, as may be decided by the government.12. in view of the coal mines labour welfare fund (repeal act, 1986) including the option and also the order passed by the central government, it is clear that after the absorption, the employees those who ..... 1.8. the submission that the previous services should have been counted as made by learned counsel for the petitioner is to be appreciated in the light of the coal mines labour welfare fund (repeal act, 1985), a copy of which is placed on record as annexure p/1. by virtue of sub-section (1) of section 4 of the .....

S.S. Garga Vs. the Coal Controller and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : (1973)ILLJ575Cal

..... affidavits disclosing therein certain documents to indicate that his appointment as a secretary to the coal mines labour welfare commissioner was an appointment to a post under a statutory body, viz., the labour welfare fund created under the coal mines labour welfare fund act of 1947 which was not an appointment under the government. to meet ..... , then the petitioner must succeed. the coal mines labour welfare fund was set up by the coal mines labour welfare fund act, 1947. section 9(1) provides :9. appointment and powers of officers,(1) the central government may appoint a coal mines labour welfare commissioner and such number of inspectors, welfare officers and other staff as it thinks ..... is serious controversy between the parties. according to the learned counsel for the petitioner such appointment was made under section 9 of the coal mines labour welfare fund act, 1947. appointment under the fund was an appointment under a statutory body but it was not an appointment to a government .....

Food Corporation of India Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

..... p.geetha mani respondent(s)/respondents: -------------------------- 1. state of kerala, rep. by the chief secretary to govt., trivandrum.2. the labour welfare fund commissioner, vellayambalam, trivandrum.3. the labour welfare fund inspector, kerala labour welfare fund inspector's office kollam-1. r2 & 3 by adv. sri.k.k.babu by sri.k.k.baby this writ appeal ..... no.8057/1996. the original petition was filed by the petitioner challenging exhibit p8 show cause notice dated 30.4.1996 issued by the labour welfare fund inspector under the kerala labour welfare fund act, 1975. in the writ petition the petitioner prayed the following reliefs: "i) to call for the records and proceedings relating ..... the writ petition rejecting the submission of the petitioner that they are the department of the central government and are exempted from the applicability of the kerala labour welfare fund act, 1975 by virtue of definition under section 2(f)(v) of the act.4. learned counsel for the appellant, in support of .....

Kaiser Steel Corp. Vs. Mullins

Court : US Supreme Court

..... provision. [ footnote 2 ] kaiser operates a steel mill in california and coal mines in utah and new mexico. its mines produce only high-volatile coal, so it must purchase mid-volatile coal used in steel manufacturing from another producer. since 1959, kaiser has purchased virtually ..... welfare funds based on its purchases of coal from producers not under contract with the union, is entitled to plead and have adjudicated a defense that the promise is illegal under the antitrust and labor laws. i the national bituminous coal wage agreement of 1974 is a collective bargaining agreement between the united mine ..... mine workers of america and hundreds of coal producers, agreed to contribute to specified employee health and retirement funds on the basis of each ton of coal it produced and each hour worked by its covered employees. the agreement also required an employer to report its purchases of coal from producers not under contract with the union and to make contributions to the union welfare .....

Jintan Clinical thermometer Co. (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India a ...

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (1974)0GLR616; (1975)ILLJ169Guj

..... without fault was now a settled norm in so far as the industrial or factory legislation is concerned, which involved considerations of public welfare in general and labour welfare in particular. the essential nature of such provision also must not be forgotten that they impose a quasi-criminal liability. the penal sanction ..... nature for the use and convenience of man. there-after, their lordship illustrated various uses of civil engineering and indicated special separate branches, as for examples, civil, mining and metallurgical, electrical, chemical, aeronautical and industrial. there were also other less clearly defined branches of engineering, such as sanitary, structural, drainage, hydraulic, highway, ..... v. m/s. jaswant singh charan singh, civil appeal no. 2011 of 1966, decided on february 23, 1967, where the question was whether the 'coal' in the sales tax statute should include 'charcoal', their lordships pointed out that it was a well settled principles that in construing a word in an .....

Madurai District Co-operative Spinning Mills Ltd. Vs. P. Pandian and O ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1999)ILLJ67Mad

..... there is building construction work continuously or at intervals or grass cutting, the respondent will be engaged. it is not stated either by the engineer or by the labour welfare officer employed in the appellant-mill, that any other person is given the work in the place of the respondent. further, the respondent has clearly stated that he ..... was also engaged in the work of cleaning machines. this statement of the respondent is not denied by the two witnesses examined by the appellant before the labour commissioner. even though the building work may be causal, the grass cutting, cleaning of the machines cannot be said to be a causal one. ale cleaning of ..... a person casually) employed. therefore, as rightly found by the commissioner for workmen's compensation as well as the learned single judge, the respondent was not a casual labourer but he was a workman within the meaning of section 2(1)(n) of the workman's compensation act, 1923. 9. the only other question that arises for .....

Mineral Area Development Authority Etc. Vs. M/s Steel Authority Of Ind ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... v. state of up, civil appeal no.1295 of 2008; hindalco industries ltd. v. state of up, civil appeal no.3869 of 2014. 7 section 89, bihar coal mining area development authority act 1986. [it reads: levy of tax on use of land for other than agricultural and residential purposes (1) the authority shall subject to the ..... utilized to meet the expenditure for providing amenities such as communications, water supply and electricity for the better development of the mining areas and improve the welfare of labour and persons residing or working in the mining areas. this court analyzed the scheme of the orissa act to observe that it was enacted for the purpose of the ..... respect to entry 23 of list ii to the extent the parliamentary legislation covers the subject-matter. the legislative powers of the state with 354 (1982) 1 scc125355 coal mines act 356 western coalfields ltd (supra) [28].. 165 part i respect to other subjects under list ii, including taxes on lands and buildings, will not be affected .....

Bihar Colliery Kamgar Union Through Its Joint General Secretary Namely ...

Court : Jharkhand

..... control and supervision of the management of jitpur colliery. the workmen have been given vocational training by the management jitpur colliery for performing their duties as skilled labour. they are provided the benefits under coal mines provident fund act and also pension. the concerned workmen have been allotted c.m.p.f. account in which employer's contribution is regularly deposited by the ..... management. it is stated that the management of jitpur colliery of m/s iisco sail agreed to pay minimum wages, holidays, bonus, welfare allowance, underground allowance etc. to the .....

United States Vs. Kras

Court : US Supreme Court

..... that kras is making a good faith attempt to obtain a discharge in bankruptcy, and that he is, in fact, indigent. as was true in boddie, the "welfare income . . barely suffices to meet the costs of the daily essentials of life and includes no allotment that could be budgeted for the expense to gain access to ..... criteria of race, nationality, or alienage. graham v. richardson, 403 u. s. 365 , 403 u. s. 375 (1971). instead, bankruptcy legislation is in the area of economics and social welfare. see dandridge v. williams, 397 u.s. at 397 u. s. 484 -485; richardson v. belcher, 404 u.s. at 404 u. s. 81 ; lindsey v. normet, ..... and claims that boddie is not controlling, and that the fee requirements constitute a reasonable exercise of congress' plenary power over bankruptcy. iv boddie was a challenge by welfare recipients to certain connecticut procedures, including the payment of court fees and costs, that allegedly restricted their access to the courts for divorce. the plaintiffs, simply by reason .....

Mukesh Advani Vs. State of M.P.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1985SC1363; 1985LabIC1895; 1985(1)SCALE981; (1985)3SCC162; [1985]Supp1SCR126; 1985(2)SLJ309(SC); 1986(1)LC90(SC)

..... is no weekly holiday. sanitary conditions are in deplorable state. during the rainy season the operation of the mines is shut off and consequently the workmen are not paid wages. not a single legislation enacted for the welfare of labour is implemented or respected. no workman can leave the employment until the entire debt is repaid which is ..... of because the report of the district judge referred to in the earlier part of this judgment clearly shows that there is no bonded labour working in flagstone mines at raisen.20. undoubtedly, mines have to work in larger public and national interest. therefore, in the very nature of things, there will be contractors and the workmen ..... the district judge bhopal was directed to proceed to the site of stone quarries at raisen and ascertain the existence of bonded labour and to submit a detailed report of the working conditions in the mines. a further direction was given that the district judge may take assistance of mr. n.k. singh who had exposed and .....