Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: coal mines labour welfare fund repeal act 1986 Page 5 of about 9,795 results (0.294 seconds)

Britannia Biscuit Co. Ltd., Employees' Union vs. Asst. Commissioner of ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1983)ILLJ181Mad

..... secretary. the writ petition was filed praying for the issue of a writ of declaration, after calling for the records from the assistant commissioner of labour (headquarters), tamil nadu labour welfare fund buildings, teynampet, madras (first respondent) relating to the file d. dis. no. s4/84421/81, dated 14th october, 1981 (filed ..... along with the petition and marked as ex. a) as null and void and consequently directing the fifth respondent (the assistant commissioner of labour, chengalpattu at madras) in ..... generally concerns itself with interpretation of existing agreements. in our opinion, it is a true statement about the functions of an industrial tribunal in labour disputes."the principles enunciated in the above decision clearly show the power of the union to bind its members in properly constituted conciliation proceedings. the .....

Rajkot Engineering Association and ors. and Vs. Union of India and ors ...

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (1986)54CTR(Guj)272; (1987)1GLR3; [1986]162ITR28(Guj)

..... a period of three years from the date on which they became due. section 3 was retrospectively amended which empowers the state government to constitute a fund called the labour welfare fund and would consist, inter alia, of unpaid accumulations. section 6a was a new provision inserted by the amending act with retrospective effect that all unpaid accumulations would ..... of the said act and the rules 3 and 4 of the rules, was unconstitutional and void. section 3(1) and section 3(2)(b) of the bombay labour welfare fund act, 1953, which was enacted by the legislature of the state of bombay, were declared invalid on the ground that they violated the fundamental right of the ..... merely on the basis of affidavits but must be judges from all he relevant circumstances and from what the legislature has said (see sanjeev coke mfg. co. v. bharat coking coal ltd., : [1983]1scr1000 . in this connection, what the united states supreme court has said in united states of america v. c. t. doremus [1919] 249 us .....

N.T.C. (South Maharashtra) Limited Vs. Rashtriya Mill Mazdoor Sangh an ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : (1993)ILLJ954SC; 1992(3)SCALE276; (1993)1SCC217; [1992]Supp3SCR229

..... (1986)iillj139sc is also not well-merited. in that case, there was no provision in the coal mines [taking over of management] act, 1973 for protecting the interests of the employees of the coal mines unlike the provisions of section 14 of the coal mines [nationalisation] act 1973 or under the present act. as we have pointed out above, in the ..... or by its transfer, the termination of services on account of the closure or transfer could not be called retrenchment since retrenchment meant discharge of the surplus labour according to the ordinary accepted connotation of the word. as a result of this decision which was pronounced in november 1957, the present section 25-ff ..... the word, and as such, it could have no wider meaning than the ordinary connotation of the word according to which retrenchment meant the discharge of surplus labour or staff by the employer for any reason whatsoever, otherwise than as a punishment inflicted by way of disciplinary action, and did not include termination of .....

Manish Mohan Sharma and ors. Vs. Ram Bahadur Thakur and ors.

Court : Patna

..... . 3,53,518.00 (rupees three lakhs fifty-three thousand five hundred and eighteen) in respect of accruals of land tax. the kerala labour welfare fund, panchayat building tax, panchayat land cess, panchayat library cess, and plantation tax accrued up to june 1, 1998, in respect of ..... transfer document it contemplates that same would be less than the various amounts including 'any statutory dues' or dues in respect of labour or executive employed at the sale estate accrued up to may 31, 1998. he submits that the clb is right in holding ..... incurred in connection with the sale estates during the interim period.4.1.1.11. any statutory dues or dues in respect of labour and executives employed at the sale estates accrued up to may 31, 1998.4. 1.1.12. the figures mentioned in ..... has been placed on a decision of a full bench of this court in the case of agent, murlidhar colliery of bharat coking coal ltd. v. sital chandra pathak and ors. 1986 p.l.j.r. 1168, and my attention has been drawn to the .....

Alka Synthetics Ltd. Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of India and or ...

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : [1995]95CompCas663(Guj)

..... legislature. 250. in bombay dyeing and . v. state of bombay, : (1958)illj778sc , the court held the provisions of the bombay labour welfare fund act for constitution of a labour welfare fund and which provided that notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being in force the sum specified in sub-section (2) ..... other mode is not acquisition or taking possession under article 300a. in other words, if there is no law, there is no deprivation. acquisition of mines, minerals and quarries is deprivation under article 300a.' 120. it transpires from above that the court was dealing with extinguishment of mineral right, which was held ..... , the regulations framed for such imposition of fees and the demands made therefor are wholly unauthorised and illegal and reiterating the view taken by the supreme court in hingir rampur coal co. ltd. v. state of orissa, : [1961]2scr537 , sri jagannath ramanuj das v. state of orissa, : [1954]1scr1046 , and delhi municipal corporation v. mohd. .....

Smt. Ujjam Bai Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : [1963]1SCR778; [1963]Supp2SCR778

..... which was not a petition under article 32 but an appeal against can order under article 226. in that case under the bombay labour welfare fund act, which authorised the constituting of a fund for financing labour welfare, notices were served upon the appellant company to remit the fines and unpaid accumulations in its custody to the ..... welfare commissioner. the appellant company questioned in a petition under article 226 the validity of that act as a contravention of article 31 ..... : [1962]1scr574 . can it be said that sales-tax authorities under the act are judicial tribunals in the sense they are courts in a welfare state the governments is called upon to discharge multifarious duties affecting every aspect of human activity. this extension of the governmental activity necessitated the entrusting of .....

Ujjam Bai. Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1962SC1621; 1963(1)SCR778

..... .) which was not a petition under article 32 but an appeal against can order under article 226. in that case under the bombay labour welfare fund act, which authorised the constituting of a fund for financing labour welfare, notices were served upon the appellant company to remit the fines and unpaid accumulations in its custody to the ..... welfare commissioner. the appellant company questioned in a petition under article 226 the validity of that act as a contravention of article 31( ..... under the act. if the other view is accepted, this court will be abdicating its jurisdiction and entrusting it to administrative tribunals, who in a welfare state control every conceivable aspect of human activity and are in a dominant position to infringe the fundamental rights guaranteed to the citizens of this country. .....

Kantilal Babulal and Bros. Vs. H.C. Patel, Sales Tax Officer, Surat an ...

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : [1965]16STC973(Guj)

..... ground on which the restriction was held to be unreasonable was that the employers were made liable to pay over the moneys represented by unclaimed wages to the bombay labour welfare fund notwithstanding the bar of limitation without any corresponding extinguishment of their liability to pay the same to the employees. mr. kaji contended relying on this decision that ..... they became due were statutorily transferred to the bombay labour welfare fund constituted under the act. the supreme court held that this provision was ultra vires article 19(1)(f) and was not saved by article 19(5) since ..... bombay (a.i.r. 1958 s.c. 328). this decision raised a question of vires of section 3(1) read with section 3(2)(b) of the bombay labour welfare fund act, 1953, under which unclaimed wages due by the employers to the employees which had not been paid for a period of three years from the date on which .....

Action Committee of Employees and Workers of Andhra Pradesh State and ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1996(3)ALT463; (1997)ILLJ647AP

..... member secretary ||finance and planning department | cum-treasurer ||(nominated by the principal | ||secretary, finance and planning | ||department). | ||----------------------------------------------|--------------------||(d) deputy secretary to government, | member ||general administration | ||(welfare) department | ||----------------------------------------------|--------------------||(e) representatives of the employees viz. - | ||----------------------------------------------|--------------------||(i) all the employees' representative | member ||on the andhra pradesh civil service | ||joint staff council from time to time | ..... the aforesaid purposes for construction of rest houses, kalyana mandapams, cannot be countenanced and the said action is ultra vires the a.p. employees' welfare fund rules, 1980. 16. however, the learned advocate general appearing on behalf of the state with his usual precision and clarity submits that .....

A. Hanumantha Prasad and ors. Vs. Coal Mines Provident Fund Organisati ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2009(2)ALT370

..... l. prasanna kumar (3rd petitioner), udc, cmpfo, godavarikhani, is contemplated.now therefore, the undersigned in exercise of the powers conferred by rule 30 of the coal mines provident fund (staff & conditions of service) regulation 1964, and rule 10 of the central civil services (classification, control and appeal) rules, 1965, hereby ..... writ petition, assailing the decision, ended in dismissal. the employees went on strike, protesting the shifting of the office. the employees union approached the assistant labour commissioner (central). conciliation was initiated, and an agreement was signed by the representative of the management and the employees union, on 31.1.2006, ..... . according to the respondents, the provisions of the industrial disputes act, do not apply, and the official, who signed the understanding before the assistant labour commissioner, was not vested with the power. various steps that have been taken, after placing the petitioners under suspension, are also mentioned. it is .....