Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: coal india regulation of transfers and validation act 2000 section 4 validation of certain transfers Page 5 of about 1,305 results (0.173 seconds)

Thressiamma Jacob and ors Vs. Geologist,dptt.of Mining and Geology And ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... the above conclusion of ours gets fortified from the fact that under the mineral concession rules, 1960 framed by the government of india in exercise of the powers conferred in section 3 of the mines & minerals regulation & development act, 1957, different procedures are contemplated and different sets of rules are made dealing with the grant of mining ..... respectively[26]. providing for acquisition of the mines and rights in or over the land from which coal is obtainable. if the understanding of the state of kerala that in view of the provisions of the mines and minerals development (regulation) act, 1957, the proprietary rights in mines stand transferred and vest in the state, it ..... if thought necessary by government. that right was exercised by the same order with reference to gold, diamonds and other metals and w.r.t. minerals like coal etc. it was left to the discretion of the government to be exercised from time to time. by necessary implication, it follows that the state recognised the .....

Bira Kishore Naik Vs. Coal India Ltd. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1986SC2123; 1986LabIC1944; (1986)IILLJ139SC; 1986(1)SCALE1300; (1986)3SCC338; [1986]2SCR1044; 1986(2)LC293(SC)

..... 14 of the nationalisation act they continue to be the employees of the central government and are entitled to their wages. on behalf of coal india respondent no. 2 a government company, counter affidavit has been filed disputing the petitioner's claim. it is asserted that although subodhchandra mondal had obtained ..... observed that the relevant area belonged to the category of gassiness and as such steps were required to be taken for statutory precaution under the coal mines regulation 1957 relating to working of gaseous mines before opening the mine. the joint director directed subodh-chandra mondal to conduct gas survey and to submit ..... , 1973 or to get the concerned mining leases prematurely terminated and regranted to government companies under the mining and minerals (regulation and development) act, 1957. in order to achieve this purpose the coal mines (nationalisation) amendment ordinance was promulgated on april 29, 1976 providing that no person other than the central government or .....

indra Narayan Laik and anr. Vs. Commercial Tax Officer and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : [1977]40STC230(Cal)

..... transactions involved in the notice, the transactions were done in pursuance of the direction of the coal commissioner. in this connection my attention was drawn to clause 12e of the colliery control order, 1945, issued under the defence of india rules. the said clause reads as follows :12e. no person shall acquire or purchase or ..... considered whether there was mutuality present in the transactions and whether there was sale of sugarcane in that case. the supreme court held that the orders regulating supply and distribution of goods under control orders in a state did not absolutely impinge on the freedom to enter into contract. delimiting areas for transactions or ..... the effect of these control orders, the supreme court observed at pages 261 and 262 of the reports as follows :these decisions establish that statutory orders regulating the supply and distribution of goods by and between the parties under control orders in a state do not absolutely impinge on the freedom to enter into contract .....

Baharul Islam . Vs. The Indian Medical Association

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... before this court. the larger question before this court in the said case was as regards the conflict between the all-india council for technical education act, 1987 and the tamil nadu private college [regulation]. act, 1976, in so far as the state act provided significantly different and more stringent yardsticks to be complied with ..... by this court. d) in govt. of a.p. vs. hindustan machine tools ltd., air1975sc2037 i.n. saksena vs. state of m.p., air1976sc2250 central coal fields ltd., vs. bhubaneswar singh, air1984sc1733and several other decisions this court has upheld the amendments made to the respective acts subsequent to the decision of a court of ..... legislature has superiority over the other, then to the extent of repugnancy one supersedes the other. reliance was placed on hingir - rampur coal co. ltd. vs. state of orissa, air1961sc459 ( hingir - rampur coal co. ltd. ) wherein this court observed that in a case where a declaration is made by the parliament that it is expedient .....

M.P. Lime Manufacturers' Association, Katni and Ors. Vs. State of Madh ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1989MP264; 1989MPLJ561

..... coalfields ltd. v. special area development authority korba), air 1982 sc 697 (at p. 708) :'that the declaration in section 2 of the mines and minerals (regulation and development) act 1957 does not result in invalidation of every state legislation relating to mines and minerals is demonstrated effectively by the decision in state of haryana v ..... 1). it shall be the duty of the central government to take all such steps as may be necessary (for the conservation and systematic development of minerals in india and for the protection of environment by preventing or controlling any pollution which may be caused by prospecting or mining operations) and (for such purposes) the central government ..... of commencement of the m.p. upkar (sanshodhan) adhiniyam 1987, shall be deemed to be the rate of cess notified under this sub-section in respect of coal. provided that subject to the limitation mentioned above, the state govt. may, by notification, increase or reduce ihe rate of cess at an interval of not .....

Mrs. Madhu Garg and anr. Vs. North Delhi Power Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 124(2005)DLT688

..... it is intravires. (see indian express newspapers (bombay) pvt. ltd. v. union of india . the 'legislation', however, has not been placed before the legislature but has been inserted in the tariff act. derc (performance standards metering and billing) regulations 2002 further defines energy charges to mean the charges for energy actually consumed by the consumer ..... arguments of mr. diwan, learned counsel for mseb were upheld. he had submitted that the accounting practice adopted by mseb with regard to transit loss of coal had been consistent with the electricity (supply) annual account rules framed under section 69 of the supply act. it appears to me that the attempt to illogically ..... and conditions for supply of electricity energy fixed by the maharashtra electricity board and to its right to claim transit loss of coal. the division bench took the view that transit loss of coal was beyond the control of merc. it was also opined that the provisions of erc act would prevail over the electricity .....

Sehajdhari Sikh Federation Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... -operative societies. section 71 authorises the co-operative banks to continue functioning without obtaining fresh licence from the reserve bank of india, notwithstanding it being a condition stipulated in section 22 of the banking regulation act, 1949. 79. then comes section 72 of the 1966 act whereunder the impugned notification dated 8th october, 2003 has ..... of the word 'modification" used in article 370 (l) and in that sense it includes an amendment." (emphasis applied) (ii) m/s. burrakur coal co. ltd. v. union of india, 1961 air (sc) 954, has been cited to urge that while considering the vires of notification dated 8th october, 2003 we need not restrict ourselves ..... and `modifications' as may be prescribed in the notification, are unfettered by any restriction; (xviii) commissioner of commercial taxes, ranchi and anr. v. swarn rekha cokes and coals pvt. ltd. and ors. (2004) 6 scc 689, interpreted sections 84 and 85 of the bihar re-organization act, 2000 to mean that the provisions of a .....

Jindal Steel & Power Limited & Anr vs.ministry of Labour and Employmen ...

Court : Delhi

..... the middlings available at site as of then will be allowed to be removed for dumping of fly ash.3. lpa no.449/2015 was preferred by respondents no.3 (coal india ltd.) (cil) and 4 viz. cil and secl against the aforesaid order but which was disposed of vide order dated 17th july, 2015 with liberty to w.p.(c) nos ..... the petitioners to the said 298.913 hectares of land were also under the lease deed granted to the petitioners under section 10 of the mines and minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957 (mmdr act) and which lease has now been cancelled by the supreme court. (ii) that under the orders of the supreme court and the ordinances / acts supra in ..... . for balco. coram:-"hon ble mr. justice rajiv sahai endlaw1 wp(c) no.3398/2015 was filed pleading: (i) that the respondent no.1 union of india (uoi) vide letter dated 20th june, 1996 allocated coal block gare palma-iv/1 to the petitioner no.1 jindal steel & power ltd. (jspl) (the petitioner no.2 mr. kapil dhagat is a shareholder of the .....

S.J. Coke Industries Pvt. Ltd. Etc. Vs. Central Coalfields Ltd. Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... undertaking of the government of india engaged in the business of producing various grades of coal. the ccl sells coal to several bulk coal consumers including the present companies, who are linked consumer of the coal. the coal being an essential commodity, its prices and mode of disposal are governed by the acts/regulations/control orders and the policies ..... made by the central government/coal companies from time to time.5. with a view to further streamline the sale and distribution of the coal to its consumers all over the country, the union of india enacted a scheme in the year 2004-2005 ..... before the aforesaid decision was rendered and in his case also an interim order was passed by the calcutta high court. after the disposal of ashoka smokeless coal india (p) ltd., the writ petition filed by the respondent herein which was pending was also considered and the same was allowed following the decision of this .....

Murlidhar Jalan Vs. Income-tax Officer, Dibrugarh.

Court : Guwahati

..... of the constitution."in that case, however, it was held that the discretion to be exercised by the state was regulated discretion guided by statutory rules. in the case of pannalal binjarj v. union of india the question was considered under what circumstances the law giving discretion to an executive body can be struck down as ..... imposed on a business, the right to carry on which was guaranteed by the constitution, the validity of the tax cannot be judged by standards applicable to regulations or restrictions imposed on the manner of carrying on the business - restrictions which flow from the nature of the commodity or the repercussions of an unregulated trade ..... of u. p. wherein the provisions of the u. p. coal control order were declared ultra vires. under the coal control order, no person was entitled to sell or store for sale or otherwise dispose of coal except under a licence. clause 4 (3) of the coal control order provided that the licensing authority may grant, refuse to grant .....