Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: coal india regulation of transfers and validation act 2000 section 4 validation of certain transfers Court: kolkata Page 1 of about 25 results (1.367 seconds)

Jun 18 2010 (HC)

Coal India Limited Vs. Nicco Corporation Limited

Court : Kolkata

..... relied on section 20 and section 5(2) thereof. the petitioner has referred to sections 8, 17 and 20 to 23 of the said act and the provisions of the coal india (regulation of transfers and validation) act, 2000.6. in the said act of 1973, a 'mining company' has been defined as follows:2. definitions. - ...(j) 'mining company' means ..... paragraph 4, that certain important matters 'including winding up of the company must be reserved for the decision of the president.' the company in that case was also coal india ltd. it is such solitary sentence from paragraph 4 of the report that the company quotes to buttress its reliance on the provisions of the 1973 act and its ..... assertion that coal india ltd. cannot be dragged to the company court on a creditor's winding-up petition as it required the consent of the central government or the assent of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 23 1982 (HC)

Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Hindustan Aluminium Corporation Limi ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1983Cal307,87CWN450

..... to fix the retention prices for different producers and provide for payment to the aluminium regulation account. the expression 'regulation' in section 3 of the act should be given a liberal interpretation (see p. p. enterprises v. union of india : [1982]3scr510 ). thus unless it is manifestly unjust, any action by the ..... 22 (i) of the affidavit in opposition of the appellants affirmed by one hirak ghosh, the deputy secretary to the government of india, ministry of steel, mines and coal (department of mines) and controller of aluminium, it has been categorically averred that before issuing the impugned notifications the government examined the ..... , the contention, the learned additional solicitor-general has placedreliance upon the provision of article 266 of the constitution and a few decisions of the supreme court, namely, hingir-rampur coal company v state of orissa, : [1961]2scr537 ; govt. of madras v. zenith lamps & etectricals ltd. : [1973]2scr973 ; state of rajasthan v. sajjan lal .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 19 1976 (HC)

indra Narayan Laik and anr. Vs. Commercial Tax Officer and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : [1977]40STC230(Cal)

..... transactions involved in the notice, the transactions were done in pursuance of the direction of the coal commissioner. in this connection my attention was drawn to clause 12e of the colliery control order, 1945, issued under the defence of india rules. the said clause reads as follows :12e. no person shall acquire or purchase or ..... considered whether there was mutuality present in the transactions and whether there was sale of sugarcane in that case. the supreme court held that the orders regulating supply and distribution of goods under control orders in a state did not absolutely impinge on the freedom to enter into contract. delimiting areas for transactions or ..... the effect of these control orders, the supreme court observed at pages 261 and 262 of the reports as follows :these decisions establish that statutory orders regulating the supply and distribution of goods by and between the parties under control orders in a state do not absolutely impinge on the freedom to enter into contract .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 30 1953 (HC)

Narayanprosad Jhunjhunwalla and ors. Vs. the Indian Iron and Steel Co. ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1953Cal695

..... sections 153a and 153b, companies act, give very clear indication that amalgamation or merger of companies is a matter which relates to the incorporation or regulation of companies or corporations and can properly form the subject-matter of a law relating to corporations. section 153a provides for transfer of undertaking of one company to ..... of securing, in the interests of the general public and the union, the efficient and economical expansion and working of the iron and steel industry in india, it is essential that the steel corporation of bengal limited, and the indian iron and steel company, limited, which are engaged in the manufacture and production ..... and giving the powers conferred therein the widest amplitude permissible. (see -- 'james v. commonwealth of australia (no. 2)', (1936) ac 578 at p. 614 (d), -- 'british coal corporation v. king' (1935) ac 500 at p. 518 (e) and -- 'in re central provinces & berar sales of motor spirit and lubricants taxation act, 1938', ). 12. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 02 1979 (HC)

Amitava Bhattacharya and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Kolkata

..... the exercise of the power involves affection of some right or denial of some privilege.46. to-day the government, is a welfare state, is the regulator and dispenser or special services and provider of large number of benefits, including, jobs contracts, licences, quotas, mineral rights, etc. the government pours fourth ..... of such property, as were immediately before the specified day in the ownership, possession power, or control of such merged company, whether within or without india, and all books of accounts, registers, records and all other documents of whatever nature relating thereto : and shall be deemed to include all borrowings, ..... increasing assumption of new tasks growing complexities of managements and administration and the necessity of continuing adjustment in relations between* the corporation and government coaling for flexibility, adaptability and innovative skills it is not possible to make an exhaustive enumeration of the tests which would invariably and in all cases .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 31 1961 (HC)

Pramatha Nath Mitter and Ors. Vs. Hon'ble the Chief Justice of the Hig ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1961Cal545,65CWN920

..... at calcutta, section 9 of the high court act, 1861, sections 106, 108 and 112 of the government of india act 1915 and section 223 of the government of india act, 1935 indicate that all along this power to regulate the sittings was in the high' court (see also b. k. biswas v. phanindra nath, : air1951cal401 ). ..... the legislative competence of parliament and grant that power to the state legislature. this impugned section 23a and the purported order made thereunder plainly attempt to regulate what vacation the whole high courts should have thereby controlling the vacations of officers and servants ofthe high court, who are expressly outside the pale of ..... william in bengal, do in each year hold two sessions of oyer and terminer and coal delivery.'there is no specific mention here about holidays or vacations. but the power to regulate the sittings of the court, implies the power of regulating the holidays and vacations. the sittings of the court necessarily include the non-sittings.55 .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 28 1973 (HC)

Commissioner of Wealth-tax Vs. Smt. Sumitra Devi Jalan

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : [1974]96ITR35(Cal)

..... of the stock or share subject to that proprietorship being divested, which it may be at any moment, by a compliance with the requisite formalities.' the same position obtains in india, though the completion of the transaction by having the name entered in the register of members relates it back to the time when the transfer was first made. see nagabushanam ..... , and in the case of companies limited by shares, the liability of the members is limited to the amounts, if any, unpaid on the shares respectively held by them. by regulation 18, table a is made applicable to companies, unless by the articles of any company the terms of table a have been excluded or modified ..... . regulation 18 of table a reads as follows : 'the instrument of transfer of any share in the company shall be executed both by the transferor and transferee, and the transferor shall .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 08 1966 (HC)

Azizus Subhan Vs. Union of India (Uoi) (Through the Secy., Ministry of ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1966Cal570

..... under article 32 did not in any way impair or affect the content of the fundamental rights guaranteed to the citizen. the principles of res judicata only regulated the manner in which the said right could be successfully asserted and vindicated in courts of law. relying upon this decision mr. mukherjee argued that the ..... , out of which this appeal arises, practically on the same ground and to the same relief. in this application, however, the appellant impleaded the union of india as a party respondent which was not done in the earlier application. it was this application which was rejected by banerjee, j, as hereinbefore mentioned and this ..... mr. mukherjee very fairly drew our attention to the decisions which are against his contentions. he, however, relied upon another decision of the supreme court in amalgamated coal fields ltd. v. janapada sabha chhindwara, : air1964sc1013 in which it was held that the general principles of res judicata applied to writ petitions filed under articles 32 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 09 2012 (HC)

Aba Builders Limited and Others Vs. Smt Anjula Nagpal and Others

Court : Kolkata

..... principle, the two judgments cited on such aspect reported at (2010) 1 scc 562 (geo-group communications inc v. iol broadband limited) and (2005) 5 scc 784 (divisional manager, united india insurance co. ltd v. samir chandra chaudhary) cannot bring any cheer to the respondents. the respondents concede that the first respondent herein had admitted in her first affidavit before the ..... scc 463 (state of maharashtra v. ramdas shrinivas nayak); (2007) 5 scc 359 (jagvir singh v. state (delhi admn)); and, (2010) 10 scc 408 (state of assam v. union of india), in such circumstances, do not call for any elaborate discussion. the judgment reported at (1975) 1 scc 199 (the godhra electricity co. ltd v. the state of gujarat) for the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 13 1962 (HC)

Hall and Anderson (Private) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Calcu ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : [1963]47ITR790(Cal)

..... and purpose as from december 1, 1946, in law the ownership continued in the case of commissioner of income-tax v. bhurangya coal co. there, the respondent, a firm, the owner of a colliery at a place called bhurangya coal company ltd. for rs. 6,10,000 on march 16, 1946. the schedule attached to the deed of agreement set out in .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //