Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: coal india regulation of transfers and validation act 2000 section 4 validation of certain transfers Court: mumbai Page 1 of about 76 results (0.134 seconds)

Nerkar Madhukar Jagannath Head Master Nagarpalika Madhyamik Tantrik Vi ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2009(3)BomCR4; 2009(111)BomLR1622; 2009(4)MhLj413

..... 25.1.1989. in uco bank and anr. v. rajinder lal capoor : air2007sc2129 , in a similar situation, the supreme court referred to its decision in coal india ltd. v. saroj kumar mishra (2007)9 scc 625 where it was held as under:.that date of application of mind on the allegations levelled against an ..... .8.1987. section 2 substituted sub section 20, which reads as follows:2. in section 2 of the maharashtra employees of private schools (conditions of service) regulation act, 1977 (hereinafter referred to as 'the principal act'), for clause (20), the following clause shall be substituted, and shall be deemed to have been substituted ..... the collector under the maharashtra municipalities act, 1965, is illegal.3. admittedly, an enquiry has been held under the maharashtra employees of private schools (conditions of service) regulation act, 1977 (hereinafter referred to as the 'meps act') read with maharashtra employees of private schools (conditions of service) rules, 1981 (hereinafter referred to as ' .....

V.B. Gadekar, Deputy Engineer, Konkan Housing and Area Development Boa ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2008(1)ALLMR45; 2007(6)BomCR579; 2008(2)MhLj640

..... and other petitioners in the connected writ petitions, who are also similarly situated, on the ground that the authority has framed an act called 'the maharashtra government servants regulation of transfers and prevention of delay in discharge of official duties act, 2005' (hereinafter referred to as 'the act') under the provisions of which a person cannot ..... in the administration which would not be conducive to public interest. mrs. shilpi bose and ors. v. state of bihar and ors. : (1991)iillj591sc .in union of india v. n.p. thomas : (1993)illj1063sc , their lordships had considered whether an officer belonging to the kerala circle of the department of telecommunication is liable to be ..... right to remain posted at a place of their choice. they are liable to be transferred from one place to the other.6. in the case of union of india v. n.p. thomas : (1993)illj1063sc , the supreme court while rejecting the contention of the persons transferred as a consequence of promotion, held that the .....

M/S. Shivraj Fine Art Litho Works and Others Vs. the State of Maharash ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

..... the constitution. 24. in the case of maharaosaheb shri bhim singhji and others vs. union of india and others (air 1981 sc 234), the constitution bench of the apex court was considering validity of the urban land (ceiling and regulation) act of 1976. the apex court in the said case though held the entire statute to be ..... the market value. the learned in-charge government pleader in this respect relies on the judgments of the apex court in sanjeevcoke manufacturing company vs. m/s. bharat coking coal limited and another {(1983) 1 scc 147}, maharashtra state electricity board vs. thana electric supply co. and others {(1989) 3 scc 616}, state of maharashtra and ..... argument keeping aside for the time being the observation in sanjeev coke manufacturing co. v. bharat coking coal ltd. let us proceed on the basis that after kesavananda bharati v. state of kerala and minerva mills ltd. v. union of india, article 31-c reads as : notwithstanding anything contained in article 13, no law giving effect to .....

Jayanand Jayant Salgaonkar and Others Vs. Jayashree Jayant Salgaonkar ...

Court : Mumbai

..... therefore, that this has nothing whatever to do with succession or disposition inter vivos, i believe he is correct. plainly, the depositories act is concerned with the regulation of depositories, i.e., those entities providing depository services, and not in relation to the holders of the securities in such services, or the manner in which those ..... (paragraph 15 of the equivalent manupatra report, supra.)in this regard, the learned single judge relied on the decision of this court in nozergustad commissariat v central bank of india and ors. (1993 mh. l.j. 228)(which, in turn, relied on the supreme court decision in fruit and vegetable merchants union), and to which mr. ..... 360 : air 1995 sc 605; kokate, paragraph 21.)municipal corporation of greater bombay v hindustan petroleum corporation, (2001) 8 scc 143; kokate, paragraph 22.)and bharat coking coal v karam chand thapar and bros.(2003) 1 scc 6 : 2002 (8) scale 388; kokate, paragraph 23.)then, in paragraphs 24 to 26 of kokate, the court .....

Western Coalfields Ltd. Through the Chief General Manager Vs. the Stat ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2009(4)BomCR414; 2009(111)BomLR502

..... high court had taken different view after noticing the concept of vesting and its different shades. it is further clarified that wcl did not acquire a single lease under coal bearing areas (regulation & development) act, 1957 and hence only the provisions of section 10(1) and 11(1) govern the issue. there is no question of looking into sub ..... or discharge of waste slime or tailings. section 2 of this act declares that the parliament has found it expedient in public interest that union of india should take under its control the regulation of mines and the development of minerals to the extent provided in the act no. 67 of 1957. the first schedule to the act in ..... upon above specimen copy of order. it only shows that when union of india accepted an artificial person in the shape of wcl to substitute itself, certain regulatory measures have been made in the orders issued under section 11(1) of coal bearing act. the regulations do not deny right to transfer to petitioner and in no way states that .....

Shri M.B. Motwani Vs. Uco Bank, Formerly Known as United Commercial Ba ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2009(111)BomLR3003; 2009(6)MhLj660

..... prior thereto. pendency of a preliminary enquiry, therefore, by itself cannot be a ground for invoking clause 20 of the regulations. albeit in a different fact situation but involving a similar question of law in coal india ltd. this court held:13. it is not the case of the appellants that pursuant to or in furtherance of the ..... the decisions of this court in union of india v. k.v. jankiraman, : (1991) 4 scc 109; union of india v. sangram kehsari nayak : (2007) 6 scc 704 and coal india ltd v. saroj kumar mishra : (2007) 9 scc 625.xxxxx xxxxx xxxxx19. it is worth noticing that the 1979 regulations would be attracted when no disciplinary proceeding is ..... possible to be initiated the 1976 regulations, however, on the other hand, would be .....

Kailaschand Khusalchand Bakliwal Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1977)79BOMLR449

..... providing for a relief to agriculturists and to reduce the liability where the maker or the endorser of a negotiable instrument was an agriculturist, the legislature was regulating money-lending to agriculturists. we are, therefore, of the view that notwithstanding the fact that there is a complete extinguishment of the debtor's liability, the ..... further, according to mr. mehta, the scope of the words 'money-lending' and 'money-lenders' in list ii must be restricted only to regulatory provisions regulating the activities of money-lending and money-lenders and they cannot take within its sweep a legislation which has the effect of totally extinguishing debts or discharge of complete ..... legislature to provide for a transfer of property from the creditor to the debtor. reference was made to the decision of the supreme court in burrakur coal co. v. union of india : [1962]1scr44 , in which the supreme court pointed out that where the language of an act is clear, the preamble must be disregarded. .....

Tan Bug Taim Vs. Collector of Bombay

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1946Bom216; (1945)47BOMLR1010

..... with her majesty. by this section the governor general in council was given absolute powers to make such laws and regulations, subject only to the limitations contained in those provisos which were all of a general nature. when, however, the government of india act, 1915, consolidated up to 1919 (5 & 6 geo. v, c. 61, 6 & 7 geo. v, c. 37 ..... or organic statute such as the act [i.e., the british north america act], that construction most beneficial to the widest possible amplitude of its powers must be adopted': british coal corporation v. the king [1935] a.c. 500.he further relied on the case of in re c.p. motor spirit act, in which at p. 4, col. 2 ..... and liberal interpretation to the provisions of that act. he relied upon the principles of construction which have been laid down in this behalf in various cases beginning with british coal corporation v. the king [1935] a.c. 500, in which it was observed (p. 518):indeed, in interpreting a constituent or organic statute such as the act, that .....

M. Sreenivasulu Reddy and ors. Vs. Kishore R. Chhabria and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : [2002]109CompCas18(Bom)

..... or records if the transfer of the shares or debentures is in contravention of any of the provisions of the securities and exchange board of india act, 1992 (15 of 1992), or regulations made thereunder or the sick industrial companies (special provisions) act, 1985 (1 of 1986). (4) the company law board while acting under ..... observed as follows (p. 619) : 'as we said earlier, under the scheme of the act, it is the reserve bank of india that is constituted and entrusted with the task of regulating and conserving foreign exchange. if one may use such an expression, it is the 'custodian--general' of foreign exchange. the task of ..... being in breach of the provisions of the securities and exchange board of india (substantial acquisition of shares and takeovers) regulations, 1994 (hereinafter referred to as 'the sebi regulations of 1994'). these regulations are framed under section 30 of the securities and exchange board of india act, 1992 (hereinafter referred to as the 'sebi act'). some of .....

Shirish Finance and Investment (P.) Ltd. Vs. M. Sreenivasulu Reddy

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2002(1)BomCR419

..... act being contrary to law as well as on account of the penal provisions in the securities and exchange board of india act, 1992. furthermore, the provisions of regulation 12 of the 1997 regulations prohibit defendant nos. 1 to 11 from acquiring control over herbertsons ltd., defendant no. 12, in view of the failure ..... substantial acquisitions of shares of defendant no. 12 by some of the defendants on the ground of the acquisitions being in breach of regulations framed by the securities & exchange board of india (sebi), which had come into force with effect from 7-11-1994. the learned judge, by the impugned common order, made ..... of the sebi act, the board with the previous approval of the central government, framed regulations, viz., securities and exchange board of india (substantial acquisition of shares and takeovers) regulations, 1994. these regulations came into force with effect from 4-11-1994. under regulation 2(f)), 'acquirer' has been defined as follows : '2(b) 'acquirer' means .....