Cliented - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: cliented Year: 2010 Page 1 of about 5,922 results (0.083 seconds)Padilla Vs. Kentucky
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Mar-30-2010
..... the weight of prevailing professional norms supports the view that counsel must advise her client regarding the risk of deportation national legal aid and defender assn performance guidelines for ..... should appreciate the extraordinary importance that the risk of removal might have in the client s determination whether to enter a guilty plea accordingly unreasonable and incorrect information concerning .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAshok Kumar Todi Vs. Kishwar Jahan and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: May-18-2010
Reported in: AIR2011SC1254
..... learned single judge has violated the principles of natural justice causing irreparable injury to his client and for the aforesaid irregularity the order impugned has been vitiated 20 mr kapoor further ..... accused persons and thus the learned single judge erred in law in holding against his client without disclosing any detailed charge levelled against him mr sengupta submits that the allegations made .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTIndiabulls Securities Limited and Others Vs. Securities and Exchange B ...
Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT
Decided on: Oct-26-2010
..... detect certain specified red alerts and sanitise the system against them and also to the clients cautioning them to desist from raising such alerts the adjudicating officer after considering the facts ..... these transactions must also fail the transactions undertaken by the appellant on behalf of other clients are squarely covered by the facts and circumstances in the case of indiabulls securities ltd .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/S. Prashant J. Patel Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of India
Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT
Decided on: Aug-17-2010
..... now deal with the negotiated synchronized trades executed by the appellant on behalf of his clients we have already held that negotiated synchronized trades are not by themselves illegal but if ..... out that the appellant while executing the 54 impugned transactions allotted 14 different client codes to his 7 clients and this according to the enquiry officer was done with an ulterior motive .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBanabhari Das Vs. Bijay Kumar Sahu and ors.
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Mar-26-2010
Reported in: 110(2010)CLT29
..... two fold the advocate by his obligation is bound to discharge his duties to his client with the strictest fidelity is answerable to the disciplinary jurisdiction of the court for dereliction ..... indian contract act 1872 also militates against the premises that relationship between an advocate his client can be determined uniterally by one of them or even biletarally by both or them .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTZonal Manager, Central Bank of India and ors. Vs. Devi Ispat Ltd. and ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Apr-05-2010
Reported in: 2010(5)LW151
..... submits that after the disposal of the writ application his client has already instituted a proceeding before the debt recovery tribunal ..... the various letters written by his client never alleged fraud against his client and that his client is not at all involved with ..... from the appellant mr pal after taking instruction expressed his client s specific instruction not to return the said amount as .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJerman Vs. Carlisle, Mcnellie, Rini, Kramer and Ulrich Lpa
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Apr-21-2010
..... endorses and drives forward this dynamic for today s holding leaves attorneys and their clients vulnerable to civil liability for adopting good faith legal positions later determined to ..... attorney s personal financial interests into the professional and ethical dynamics of the attorney client relationship these consequences demonstrate how untenable the court s statutory interpretation is and .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHolland Vs. Florida
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-14-2010
..... abandoned by lawyer merited tolling calderon 128 f 3d at 1289 allowing tolling where client was prejudiced by a last minute change in representation that was beyond his control ..... attorneys to perform reasonably competent legal work to communicate with their clients to implement clients reasonable requests to keep their clients informed of key developments in their cases and never to abandon .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMilavetz, Gallop and Milavetz, P. A. Vs. United States
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Mar-02-2010
..... this statement provides interested observers with pertinent information about the advertiser s services and client obligations other information that milavetz must or may include in its advertisements for ..... require debt relief agencies whether attorneys or bankruptcy petition preparers to inform prospective clients of their options for obtaining bankruptcy assistance services footnote 5 if read as .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJones Vs. Harris Associates L. P.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Mar-30-2010
..... burdensome regulatory and legal obligations and higher marketing costs 527 f 3d at 634 different clients call for different commitments of time if the services rendered are sufficiently different that ..... mindful that the act does not necessarily ensure fee parity between mutual funds and institutional clients contrary to petitioners contentions see id at 631 plaintiffs maintain that a fiduciary may .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial