Characterized - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: characterized Year: 2003 Page 1 of about 232 results (0.014 seconds)L. and T. Komatsu Limited Vs. Senior Sub-registrar and ors.
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Dec-02-2003
Reported in: AIR2004Kant308
not a case of acting without jurisdiction it cannot be characterised that the registering authority has acted without jurisdiction in initiating
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTEstate Officer and Manager (Recoveries), A.P. Industrial Infrastructur ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-06-2003
Reported in: AIR2004AP198; 2003(5)ALD599; 2003(5)ALT216; III(2004)BC290
vague and indefinite in its terms cannot be treated and characterised as a document of title enabling the company to create
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTC. Vidyasagar Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-22-2003
Reported in: 2003(2)ALD150; 2003(2)ALT216
and delegated to the 2nd respondent investing it with the characteristic status of an instrumentality of the state analysis of the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTiswar Raj and ors. Vs. Special Court Under A.P. Land Grabbing (Prohibi ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-16-2003
Reported in: 2003(3)ALD126; 2003(3)ALT273
their application is inescapable making allegation of land grabbing and characterising a person as a land grabber is fraught with serious
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM. Veerateswaran Vs. the Deputy Collector Cum Sub-divisional Executive ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-18-2003
Reported in: 2003(2)CTC449; (2003)2MLJ578
in passing on the constitutionality of local regulations of the character involved here but in that process they should be mindful
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTTamalarasi Vs. S. Kumarasamy Gounder,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-18-2003
Reported in: (2003)2MLJ710
observed webster defines such as having the particular quality or character specified certain representing the object as already particularised in terms
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM.R. Gopinath Vs. Tribunal for Election Disputes of the Institute of C ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Nov-12-2003
Reported in: AIR2004Kant188; [2004]49SCL720(Kar)
date by no stretch of imagination this act can be characterised as an accidental irregularity the tribunal is clearly in error
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDayanand B. Nayak Vs. Ketan K. Tirodkar and anr.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Dec-17-2003
Reported in: 2004CriLJ2177
an enquiry under section 202 can in no sense be characterised as a trial for the simple reason that in law
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDhawal S. Chotai Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Apr-30-2003
Reported in: AIR2003Bom316; 2003(3)ALLMR403; 2003(5)BomCR41; 2003(4)MhLj698
mean a group of non progressive conditions of a person characterised by abnormal motor control posture resulting from brain insult or
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSyed Shabbir HussaIn and ors. Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Mar-20-2003
Reported in: ILR2003KAR2357; 2003(3)KarLJ395
the crimes with which they are charged or from their character or behaviour that such persons will use violence or will
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial